Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,589
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Jan 25/26 Storm Threat...(Part 3)


Marion_NC_WX

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 899
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Sounds like the NAM portrays a brine flusher! Need to get that junk off the roads anyway so we can get a good freeze to the roads later.

TW

Of which has been applied to roads all over my area today.

No suprise here with Nam. Still looks like previous runs of Nam. I'll pay attention to it out past 48 when euro and gfs , paticullarly euro sing the same tune.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This GFS sounding illustrates why you cant just dismiss this storm:

Date: 3.5 day AVN valid 6Z WED 26 JAN 11
Station: 35.31,-81.23
Latitude:   35.31
Longitude: -81.23
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LEV PRES  HGHT  TEMP  DEWP  RH  DD   WETB DIR SPD THETA THE-V THE-W THE-E   W
    mb     m     C     C    %   C     C  deg knt   K     K     K     K    g/kg
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 0 1000    73                                                                 
SFC  978   254   1.9   0.6  91  1.3   1.3 358  12 276.8 277.5 275.6 288.0  4.08
 2  950   487   2.2  -0.9  80  3.0   0.9  14  25 279.4 280.0 276.6 289.9  3.77
 3  900   924   1.5  -2.3  76  3.8  -0.1  26  30 283.0 283.6 278.2 293.1  3.57
 4  850  1383   0.4  -2.5  81  2.9  -0.8  30  27 286.6 287.2 280.1 297.3  3.75
 5  800  1868  -1.2  -1.7  97  0.4  -1.4  40  19 289.8 290.6 282.2 302.1  4.23
 6  750  2383  -1.8  -2.0  98  0.2  -1.9  80  10 294.6 295.4 284.4 307.5  4.39
 7  700  2930  -3.9  -4.1  98  0.3  -4.0 133   7 298.2 298.9 285.4 310.3  4.02
 8  650  3513  -6.7  -7.1  97  0.4  -6.8 185  10 301.4 302.0 286.0 312.0  3.45
 9  600  4135 -10.0 -11.0  92  1.0 -10.4 205  13 304.6 305.1 286.5 313.2  2.75
10  550  4800 -15.1 -16.0  93  0.9 -15.4 216  17 306.1 306.5 286.2 312.5  2.00
11  500  5511 -21.3 -21.9  95  0.6 -21.4 213  27 307.1 307.3 285.8 311.4  1.33
12  450  6280 -26.9 -27.2  97  0.3 -26.9 201  45 309.4 309.6 286.2 312.5  0.91
13  400  7119 -32.9 -33.3  96  0.4 -32.9 195  49 312.2 312.4 286.8 314.2  0.58
14  350  8045 -39.2 -45.8  50  6.6 -39.6 199  61 315.8 315.9 287.6 316.5  0.18
15  300  9090 -43.6 -62.9  10 19.3 -44.2 203  73 323.9 323.9 290.0 324.0  0.03
16  250 10302 -47.8 -62.5  17 14.7 -48.2 215  70 335.0 335.0 293.1 335.1  0.03
17  200 11763 -51.2 -65.3  17 14.0 -51.6 232  65 351.6 351.6 297.0 351.8  0.03
18  150 13606 -56.9 -71.4  14 14.6 -57.1 246  71 372.1 372.1 300.9 372.2  0.02
19  100 16150 -60.1 -84.0   3 23.9 -60.4 259  54 411.5 411.5 306.7 411.6  0.00
TRP                                             0                              
WND                                             0                              

If you get the precip rates the NAM is showing, you're going to flash over to heavy snow because of those dewpoint depressions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM had CLT area and points west to around the Apps in 1.50 to 1.75 QPF ohmy.gif...just to the south of CLT is in 1.75 - 2.0 of QPF....man if we could this QPF with the temps cold enough game over!

Anyways lets see what the GFS and Euro have to say, this isn't the nail yet..I'm still a true weenie and won't believe until the day before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to be honest here: I think from KCLT to the coast are in for a mostly rain event. It wouldn't be impossible to see snow at the tail end, but even that is a stretch. I have said since last weekend that this storm did not look good for us in central NC. Why? Because the west-based NAO that allowed our cold high pressures to lock in to the north was not present with this storm, thus the timing of any potential southern stream shortwaves had to link up almost perfectly with a high sliding offshore. Clearly, and is has been clear for days, the high and associated cold air advection is going to be over before this storm ever gets going for us in NC. Every model run, from every model shows this. So please, don't say that I'm just basing this off of one model run, because that couldn't be further from the truth. I'm recognizing that this pattern is not favorable for NC winter storms, and using situational awareness to see that there aren't overly cold temps anywhere in the southeast during the event which would allow "dynamics" to turn us over to heavy, wet snow. Now I won't absolutely say that no one from CLT to the coast won't see snow somewhere during the event, but the likelihood is slim in my eyes.

Let's look at the facts: even with a perfectly modeled track, everyone from RDU east is mostly, if not entirely, rain from every model. Sure, there may be some hint that we could end as snow, but I have seen that song and dance before. It is likely the dendritic growth zone will dry out before RDU east would be cold enough to support snow. By 18z on Wednesday, the temperatures have soared back into the mid 40's from both the NAM and GFS. There is absolutely no evidence to support the fact that they are totally wrong...there isn't any big cold air to the north that could be advected in to change this fact. Folks, I really believe the writing is on the wall and there is no need to get overly hopeful about a pattern that isn't likely to yield a big snow for central and eastern NC (and even out to KCLT in my book).

Lastly, I do not think that KCLT will fair much, if any better than KRDU. Why? The CAD wedge is not very well established by the time precip arrives, and with the amount of WAA associated with this low, the wedge should be eroded fairly quickly out to KCLT. Let's pretend the wedge holds, well 950 temps are forecasted to be at 6.0C+ on both the NAM and GFS by the time precip really starts coming in...which would still yield rain! The argument that both models are way too warm at this level doesn't hold much water in my view, as there isn't much colder temps to the north or west. Honestly, there is no way both of these models are going to blow temps across the entire eastern seaboard by that much. Now, by the end of the event I suppose a near isothermal layer could setup somewhere under the deformation band, and this area might have the potential for some very wet snow, with ratios of 5:1 at best, but I just don't see much support for it in the model soundings I have seen. I don't have access to the euro, so that is the one model that could be colder. Even so, I stand by everything I have said.

Excellent, excellent post. :flood::maprain::raining:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cold Rain(I think...) said it earlier. There is absolutely nothing from stopping this from going inland. 6 hrs ago, I wasn't sure if the qpf would get here. Now, it's a sloppy mess in NE TN. I don't think the models are through w/ this yet. Personally, and I've read much of the thread, I still think this could wrap up into a big storm per the NAM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of which has been applied to roads all over my area today.

No suprise here with Nam. Still looks like previous runs of Nam. I'll pay attention to it out past 48 when euro and gfs , paticullarly euro sing the same tune.

yeah it moved the surface low 250 miles west so of course it should be take as the gospel truth...

still doubt i will see anything nice my way but maybe GSO will get something and work will close early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this run does suck for most- 700mb and surface low way too far north- in 1983 the surface low went over north FL this run has it over ATL. I hope that this is just a NAM hiccup...

It really all depends on the grouping of vortmax's in BC right now and how they interact. I don't think we'll have that really nailed down until at least within 36 to 48 hrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100% agree. Going to be a nowcast event...Unless, as Dan noted, the NAM is the start of a new trend. However, with such a large warm jump in one run....Need to see more.

It really all depends on the grouping of vortmax's in BC right now and how they interact. I don't think we'll have that really nailed down until at least within 36 to 48 hrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this run does suck for most- 700mb and surface low way too far north- in 1983 the surface low went over north FL this run has it over ATL. I hope that this is just a NAM hiccup...

The Ukmet has sniffed out the shift in the storm more than once this winter. Tnweathernut has kept loose tabs on it. When it shifted at 12z, I became a little concerned. Now, even in E TN, that would be rain according to the NAM. I wouldn't rule it out, but I would be surprised to see an Apps runner. HPC even hinted that the Canadian was a little the west of their thinking if I remember correctly. How west can this go? As absurd as it sounds, could it cut west of the Apps?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...