Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

NYC/PHL 1/25-27 potential Part III


NortheastPAWx

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 976
  • Created
  • Last Reply

So instead of snow-rain-snow or snow-rain we're talking rain-snow like Xmas 2002. That was an awesome storm most would love a repeat of-- 8 inches of snow with the wrap around.

Actually, Christmas 2002 was snow-rain-snow around these parts. I think a half inch or so on the front end, then there was an ocassional flake or two mixed with the rain through the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GFS is trending towards the west. The ECMWF is trending to the east. The GEM who knows that much QPF is insane and boy is it warm. The NAM what a joke. I can go on and on, but with some much model inconsistency the forecast is anyone quess. Just look at the NYC NWS office forecast they do not know either,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nogaps is way wide right, shocker.

In case you did not know that is where you want the model to be with all the other models now going west. If the nogaps kept going west you would end up with a final result of a storm tracking into C PA... Notice how now all the models ....

NAM/GGEM/GFS/GFES Means/UKMET are all trending west or some have always been more west....

GGEM is right off the DE coast...they are also all trending slower.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case you did not know that is where you want the model to be with all the other models now going west. If the nogaps kept going west you would end up with a final result of a storm tracking into C PA... Notice how now all the models ....

NAM/GGEM/GFS/GFES Means are all trending west or some have always been more west....

GGEM is right off the DE coast...they are also all trending slower.....

maybe they are trending slower because HECS dont occur on weekdays

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case you did not know that is where you want the model to be with all the other models now going west. If the nogaps kept going west you would end up with a final result of a storm tracking into C PA... Notice how now all the models ....

NAM/GGEM/GFS/GFES Means are all trending west or some have always been more west....

GGEM is right off the DE coast...they are also all trending slower.....

Hey, are you some navy guy or something....defending the navy model...just wondering

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi...First post here. Can you explain how the entire column is below freezing when the temp line goes above 0c? Sorry, just learning to use twisterdata tonight and am a little confused over how to read it. Thanks!

The zero Celcius line goes up to the right at an angle, its the way the plot is displayed.

NIU doesn't allow a 102 GFS forecast sounding, but Hour 96, an emagram, the freezing line is vertical...

13389.GIF

ETA- exact same forecast time and location sounding, conventional forecast skew-T. skew-Ts are best (for me) for thunderstorm guess-casting...

14238.GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi...First post here. Can you explain how the entire column is below freezing when the temp line goes above 0c? Sorry, just learning to use twisterdata tonight and am a little confused over how to read it. Thanks!

The 0°C line doesn't go straight up -- none of them do. They go diagonally up to the right (see the other 0°C written along the right edge? The line connecting them is the 0° line!)

They should really alter the tick marks along the bottom of those graphs so they're diagonal. It'd clear up 90% of people's confusion...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...