Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

NYC/PHL Jan 25-28 Potential Threat Part 2


am19psu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I would think the EC is serious flood threat, scary one at that for many. Still 4 5 days out, but I'm seriously starting to think the only way we get snow is with GFS type of weak low solution. I' ve seen plenty of storms with awesome tracks bring heavy rain well inland. I don't post much, but i read this board alot and i find it really baffling so many cannot see what screaming south easterly winds straight off the gulf stream will do to transient arctic air in this setup. There's nothing good at all on this solution for I95 snow lovers, will it happen like this? Doubt it, but it sure raised my eyebrows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out to 96h...looks like it will be a littlemore tame than the op run which isnt a shock...how much more tame, we'll find out in a couple frames.

Yeah not totally surprising...this a type of case where the ensembles could be mouth-watering but have a ton of spread to the left and right. The GFS Ensembles are certainly different though...there's little spread..they are all hits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just SE of ACK at 120h. Definitely some bagginess in the isobars to the SW suggesting that there are def some amped up members that look closer tot he op run.

If the ensemble mean verified though, everyone would stay snow.

Hows the comparison to the 12z ensembles? They amped up considerably from the ensembles at 00z last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hows the comparison to the 12z ensembles? They amped up considerably from the ensembles at 00z last night.

Definitely tamer than the 12z ensemble....by quite a bit. Also much faster. The 12z run at 132h had the low over ACY...hugging the coast. 00z never gets that far W and also has the low SE of ACK at 120h (same verification time as 12z 132h)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely tamer than the 12z ensemble....by quite a bit. Also much faster. The 12z run at 132h had the low over ACY...hugging the coast. 00z never gets that far W and also has the low SE of ACK at 120h (same verification time as 12z 132h)

Wow...now that's the best news I've heard so far tonight. I'll take it for now...lots of variance in the guidance to be expected for the next few days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...