Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

NYC/PHL Jan 25-28 Potential Threat Part 2


am19psu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

big warning sign with the ggem is it has a much different H5 progression but still bombs the thing out and drags it into the delmarva then over NW jersey (hint hint, you wont find many lows that have ever gone over nw jersey).

would not put much stock in this model

I am guessing a coastal hugger over ACY and points northeast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ggem out on ewall

im not sure those experimental maps go back to snow quick enough based on the ewall maps

http://www.meteo.psu...0z/cmcloop.html

looking at it over and over, it really backed off hard core from its diving the H5 to the GOM. wonder if its playing catch up and thinking its not like this at all tomorrow 12z

EXACTLY, major changes especially within such a short period of time. Like you I do suspect more changes at 12z tomorrow and this is most likely supported by ensembles. What is becoming obviously is models have become much more progressive and hold back less energy...which essentially is playing catch up to the GFS depiction. At what point do we start to credit the GFS more and give it more respect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks like cmc takes what the gfs is treating as a kicker and phases it with the main short wave which is why its still amped up and inland

totally new solution, probably just a bogus and is really a sympton of all the energy in the northern stream and how messy this is going to be for many more days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EXACTLY, major changes especially within such a short period of time. Like you I do suspect more changes at 12z tomorrow and this is most likely supported by ensembles. What is becoming obviously is models have become much more progressive and hold back less energy...which essentially is playing catch up to the GFS depiction. At what point do we start to credit the GFS more and give it more respect?

when the event is 24 hrs away and not 108 or 120

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EXACTLY, major changes especially within such a short period of time. Like you I do suspect more changes at 12z tomorrow and this is most likely supported by ensembles. What is becoming obviously is models have become much more progressive and hold back less energy...which essentially is playing catch up to the GFS depiction. At what point do we start to credit the GFS more and give it more respect?

When it verifies.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

when the event is 24 hrs away and not 108 or 120

The features that are most important are evident as early as 72 hours, and all models are now showing a similar depiction at H5 as what the GFS has been portraying. The GGEM improved significantly, I suspect surface features might reflect this at 12z.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ukie and fim bring the new HP in just as the old one is eroding away

the 12z/0z shifts show just how volatile this is, and even though the ggem manages to fool itself into an inland track, its h5 are night and day

You my friend...voice of reason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...