Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Friday, January 21st Storm Discussion II


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

1) Look past the models

2) Seasonal trends of northern stream systems amplifying to max potential

3) No to little blocking meant should come NW

4) -8 c isotherm is always an area where big snows fall even when not modelled

5) Nina yrs storms always come NW the last 36 hrs

Thanks

I appreciate your humor, but am realizing you know more than you let on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im really liking this trend! can we bring the 5-10 into conn :weight_lift:

No.

I've used science to distill a few simple truth facts about the approaching storm:

1.) Boston gets everything

B.) Other people will get slightly less

III.) You get nothing

For.) Good day sir.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why we look less at the models and more at what is actually going on at this time range. Posting five times a day on how bad the model is, trashing and bashing, then even denying you're doing it is pretty weird. :D

It hasn't produced a stable run since h84. That's pretty hard to deny, and fairly unusual even for the NAM. On the same token, the SREF's have made huge swings, and even the Euro has been jumping. But to say the NAM has been totally inconsistent in the handling of the low going from almost a total miss 18 hours ago to a whopping hit...call it whatever you want. The models that had a consistent .3 to .45 in the area like the Euro did much better up to this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its amazing how the northern stream keeps trending stronger each storm at the last minute. I was starting to doubt that trend yesterday even though I was the one who had pointed it out for the previous storms this winter....but it seems to be going that direction again. Its all about the northern stream having more defined vortmax and able to dig a little more.

Yes, I think we have a clear trend this winter to follow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No.

I've used science to distill a few simple truth facts about the approaching storm:

1.) Boston gets everything

B.) Other people will get slightly less

III.) You get nothing

For.) Good day sir.

Arent you the guy that just threatened to kill someones family? I rather wait for someone elses answer. Troll!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Arent you the guy that just threatened to kill someones family? I rather wait for someone elses answer. Troll!

I didn't threaten anyone!

There's a difference between a threat and a promise.

Anyhow, if the 12z NAM is on to something, you may well see 5" in CT (even if it's overdoing the QPF a bit; ratios should be a nudge generous for many places).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every model has been inconsistent with this...I don't care if it's the euro, gfs, jma...every one..not just the NAM.

Yeah they have all been pretty bad at handling this. Euro was probably most consistent, but even then, it had like barely 0.20" of qpf a couple runs ago to go with a putrid looking upper air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every model has been inconsistent with this...I don't care if it's the euro, gfs, jma...every one..not just the NAM.

What's the theory on why at this point? It seems to be getting worse not better.

Would agree with Will though that the Euro has essentially been at least an advisory even for the last day or so. And it ramped up considerably at 0z. Watch it go out to sea this run :)

RGEM has been pretty darn consistent, it insisted on a track further west than every other model FWIW.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...