Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Threat Jan 25-28th time fram. Possible Miller A


IsentropicLift

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 991
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Fantastic post. One of the best I have read in years. To believe any solution depicted by these models at this time is folly and pretty much a waste of time and energy.

The models have much better access to equations and responses to those equations than I do (I did Meteo until the end of my sophomore year), but if any input into those equations is wrong, and in any particular area where those equations are needed is insufficient for any reason, the potential for chaos increases about exponentially for the amount of time needed to reach a particular solution. It especially expresses itself in a heavily chaotic pattern such as a strong Nina, where numerous northern stream impulses (and resultant weakened southern stream impulses since each has some impact on the other in our energy conserved system) have more frequent and strengthened impulses (each requiring solutions to particular equations to determine their particular strengths and their resultant dampening and strengthening effects on subsequent or preceding waves since waves interfere or strengthen each other based on fluid thermodynamics) than a "normal" year.

Chaos multiplies on chaos which is exponentially... etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The models have much better access to equations and responses to those equations than I do (I did Meteo until the end of my sophomore year), but if any input into those equations is wrong, and in any particular area where those equations are needed is insufficient for any reason, the potential for chaos increases about exponentially for the amount of time needed to reach a particular solution. It especially expresses itself in a heavily chaotic pattern such as a strong Nina, where numerous northern stream impulses (and resultant weakened southern stream impulses since each has some impact on the other in our energy conserved system) have more frequent and strengthened impulses (each requiring solutions to particular equations to determine their particular strengths and their resultant dampening and strengthening effects on subsequent or preceding waves since waves interfere or strengthen each other based on fluid thermodynamics) than a "normal" year.

Chaos multiplies on chaos which is exponentially... etc.

Very interesting take. Thank you again for another fantastic post. This is the kind of thing that allows us hobbyists to learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The models have much better access to equations and responses to those equations than I do (I did Meteo until the end of my sophomore year), but if any input into those equations is wrong, and in any particular area where those equations are needed is insufficient for any reason, the potential for chaos increases about exponentially for the amount of time needed to reach a particular solution. It especially expresses itself in a heavily chaotic pattern such as a strong Nina, where numerous northern stream impulses (and resultant weakened southern stream impulses since each has some impact on the other in our energy conserved system) have more frequent and strengthened impulses (each requiring solutions to particular equations to determine their particular strengths and their resultant dampening and strengthening effects on subsequent or preceding waves since waves interfere or strengthen each other based on fluid thermodynamics) than a "normal" year.

Chaos multiplies on chaos which is exponentially... etc.

Terrific job explaining the inherent uncertainty of weather prediction and the fantasy of the Laplacian... or what forecasters like to call "Initialization errors".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hr 126 sub 996 low over raliegh, nc...about to get captured by the h5 low... dc was getting mod snow but they prob have changed over..850 line just bout to reach them..phl is in lgt to mod precip

It sounds like and looks like it's going to come inland.. Maybe a more wet then white solution even for inland areas. Just based on trends in the 500mb chart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The models have much better access to equations and responses to those equations than I do (I did Meteo until the end of my sophomore year), but if any input into those equations is wrong, and in any particular area where those equations are needed is insufficient for any reason, the potential for chaos increases about exponentially for the amount of time needed to reach a particular solution. It especially expresses itself in a heavily chaotic pattern such as a strong Nina, where numerous northern stream impulses (and resultant weakened southern stream impulses since each has some impact on the other in our energy conserved system) have more frequent and strengthened impulses (each requiring solutions to particular equations to determine their particular strengths and their resultant dampening and strengthening effects on subsequent or preceding waves since waves interfere or strengthen each other based on fluid thermodynamics) than a "normal" year.

Chaos multiplies on chaos which is exponentially... etc.

True poetry, JM, true poetry. Whoever said that science wasnt an art (heh we all know who that was) never read anything like this. I totally got the image in my mind of what you were posting, and it sounded a great deal like the interference patterns and phasing/out of phase scenarios we deal with in trying to model the wave/particle duality of light in physics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...