Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,604
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Jan 20-22 Threat Potential Part 2


am19psu

Recommended Posts

As I wrote an hr or so ago wouldn't be surprised to see other Models trend Better as the Nam trended Worse..Nothing more than a hunch because nothing has been easy or point blank with these storms meaning a clear cut solution by almost every model days out..So why why would it happen now..whistle.gif

This happens alot for some reason with the NAM and GFS...one is showing something for days and then flips and the other goes towards where the other model had been....sometimes its simply a blip run but every once in awhile they can trade places for an extended period, even up until when the event starts...based on the SREFs I think the NAM will return at 12Z...I won't even guess what the 06Z will do, if it was over Philly I would not be surprised the way the off hour NAM has been lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 992
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Very high ratios on the GFS. The temp never gets above 25 N&W of I-95 while snow is falling, and in the Lehigh Valley and Poconos it's just 15-20 degrees. That with .35-.45 QPF would be about 4-6" of snow.

January 04 clipper and 2/6/93 arctic front are the best ratios I've ever seen on the coast near NYC...if we can get those we could get great amounts out of this, even with just .30-.40

Link to comment
Share on other sites

January 04 clipper and 2/6/93 arctic front are the best ratios I've ever seen on the coast near NYC...if we can get those we could get great amounts out of this, even with just .30-.40

Was the February 6 1993 snow event on a Saturday? I remember snow falling heavily during the morning, with the City coming in at around 3-4 inches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

northern and southern streams are off...the low in the SW stays closed to long and hangs back....at 180 it looks better with a developing -nao, energy in the SW ejecting and a Sw diving in out of canada

But those are specifics we should be looking at in the closer range. It definitely shows big potential - maybe bigger than this next storm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*yawn* glad to wake up from my nap, look at the latest runs, and can still be comfortable with the 3-6 "gun to the head" call I made ;)

Tombo got sick of this thread and abandoned it, btw. Maybe he'll come back for the EC...

I agree...and I would certainly love a 3-6 inch event. It's been a while, actually..since we had a 3-6" event that didn't feature a changeover. IIRC.

And if tombo isn't here, I'll be up tonight doing the Euro play by play regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree...and I would certainly love a 3-6 inch event. It's been a while, actually..since we had a 3-6" event that didn't feature a changeover. IIRC.

And if tombo isn't here, I'll be up tonight doing the Euro play by play regardless.

I'm not gonna rule out it could still end up more amped... watch the EC come in with a bomb tonight :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I was gonna say, the GFS and NAM are remarkably similar right now QPF-wise.

It seems that the GFS is slightly wetter and more of an 8 hour and out type deal, whereas the NAM spreads the event more over 12 hours.

Either way, I'm happy with both solutions :) I don't think this low will bomb out as prior guidance once suggested, but I do think QPF will increase ever so slightly as we approach the event. That's just been the trend of the winter so far, most notably with this past event. This seems to actually be a normal winter storm without those crazy frontogenic bands.

Anyone have an idea if/when NWS will put up watches?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a miracle how models can handle QPF similarly when there isn't a 980mb bomb with banding everywhere

Please do not forget about the CRAS..there is still major model support for a bomb. It has 5 inches of liquid in 3 hours over Southern New Hampshire. 956 pressure will shut down the I-95 corridor for months. Thank you.

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/cras/cras45_NA/00/images/cras45na_pcp_072l.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please do not forget about the CRAS..there is still major model support for a bomb. It has 5 inches of liquid in 3 hours over Southern New Hampshire. 956 pressure will shut down the I-95 corridor for months. Thank you.

http://cimss.ssec.wi...na_pcp_072l.gif

That may be the most ridiculous model output I have ever seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...