stormtracker Posted January 18, 2011 Author Share Posted January 18, 2011 We better hope the GFS is right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 We better hope the GFS is right I thinks its been doing pretty well. It handled last night very well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I thinks its been doing pretty well. It handled last night very well. that's the way I felt and said it last night the NAM is still too wound up, but 6Z became flatter 3Z SREF's are flatter too than 21Z run I think, in the end, we'll be looking at a glorified cold frontal passage with a wave on it; flow seems too fast even the Euro has nothing because of the flow (and then the knucklehead JB goes for the fences again ) 1-2" down around DCA and 3-4" at the MD/PA border(assuming all snow) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 that's the way I felt and said it last night the NAM is still too wound up, but 6Z became flatter 3Z SREF's are flatter too than 21Z run I think, in the end, we'll be looking at a glorified cold frontal passage with a wave on it; flow seems too fast even the Euro has nothing because of the flow (and then the knucklehead JB goes for the fences again ) 1-2" down around DCA and 3-4" at the MD/PA border(assuming all snow) JB is now calling 3-6 locally 8 for DC or did i read that wrong??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 JB is now calling 3-6 locally 8 for DC or did i read that wrong??? I didn't read this morning, I was talking about last night let me check Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I just read it I think he's out of his mind he must have read what DT posted the other day and thought "oh no you don't , they're my weenie nation" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 JB is now calling 3-6 locally 8 for DC or did i read that wrong??? Don't know about JB, but I'm surprised we aren't talking this up more. Almost all of the GFS ind members give us a good event, it would seem. The 3z SREF members look very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 JB is now calling 3-6 locally 8 for DC or did i read that wrong??? actually, I think he misplaced his commas DCA is 1-3" local 5"...I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 actually, I think he misplaced his commas DCA is 1-3" local 5"...I think yep...your right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 SREF's just out are flatter and colder for us flatter "good" not bad imho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiscaster Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 actually, I think he misplaced his commas DCA is 1-3" local 5"...I think His poor punctuation probably resulted in a weenie suicide somewhere. Grammar is a lost art it seems. Does anyone else cringe when the apostrophe "s" is erroneously used to indicate the plural, or "it's" is used to indicate the possessive vice the contraction "it is," or the words too/to are mixed up, or the words lose/loose are mixed up? If not, I will seek help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 No one except psuhoffman should punt Friday yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 His poor punctuation probably resulted in a weenie suicide somewhere. Grammar is a lost art it seems. Does anyone else cringe when the apostrophe "s" is erroneously used to indicate the plural, or "it's" is used to indicate the possessive vice the contraction "it is," or the words too/to are mixed up, or the words lose/loose are mixed up? If not, I will seek help. your being to critical Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Balti Zen Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 We better hope the GFS is right This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swiscaster Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 your being to critical Haha, well played. That is another biggie on this board (your/you're)! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porsche Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 FWIW, around 70% of the Euro ensemble members are more amplified than the op from 0z. This sounds positive from the NYC/PHL thread anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Balti Zen Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 My only thought on amplified ensembles is that we have not really benefited from ensemble trends or divergence from the op down this way this year. That may be good news for Philly/NYC, not as certain it is meaningful for our area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattie g Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 your being to critical You should of reread that before posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattie g Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 No one except psuhoffman should punt Friday yet. I've already dropped it inside the 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Druff Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 You should of reread that before posting. Here's some more ****ty grammar that I see all the time: should of is absolutely incorrect. You want to say should have or should've. Just because it sounds like "should of" when you say it does not mean you're writing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattie g Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Here's some more ****ty grammar that I see all the time: should of is absolutely incorrect. You want to say should have or should've. Just because it sounds like "should of" when you say it does not mean you're writing it. Thanx 4 letting me no. Ill be more careful nxt tm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timstobrazil Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Here's some more ****ty grammar that I see all the time: should of is absolutely incorrect. You want to say should have or should've. Just because it sounds like "should of" when you say it does not mean you're writing it. the english dept thread is 2 doors down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Druff Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Thanx 4 letting me no. Ill be more careful nxt tm. Mattie -- that was by no means directed at you. In fact, I should have removed the name from the quote. Yours was simply the first occurrence in the thread that became grammar critiquing on AmericanWX. LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattie g Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Mattie -- that was by no means directed at you. In fact, I should have removed the name from the quote. Yours was simply the first occurrence in the thread that became grammar critiquing on AmericanWX. LOL. I figured as much, but couldn't help it. I'm a grammar Nazi myself, so it's all in good fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showmethesnow Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 This sounds positive from the NYC/PHL thread anyway. Good to hear. I had noticed the means looked better then the op with a little more digging at 500's and better amplification. Without seeing the members though it's hard to judge if that's an accurate depiction. 00Z Euro op 00z Euro Ensem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Balti Zen Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I'd feel a lot better about the means "showing the way" if Wes or Ian (or one of the other red tags) wandered through and said there was more reason to be optimistic about them doing that this time than the other times this winter that that has not worked out for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Druff Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I figured as much, but couldn't help it. I'm a grammar Nazi myself, so it's all in good fun. Ha. I am so used to reading crappy grammar and typing I had to actually go back and look at what you wrote. Love the txt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scarlet Pimpernel Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 His poor punctuation probably resulted in a weenie suicide somewhere. Grammar is a lost art it seems. Does anyone else cringe when the apostrophe "s" is erroneously used to indicate the plural, or "it's" is used to indicate the possessive vice the contraction "it is," or the words too/to are mixed up, or the words lose/loose are mixed up? If not, I will seek help. OK, I admit that I, too, get peeved at seeing the improper use of its (possessive pronoun) vs. it's (contraction for it is). Maybe because all through school they almost literally pounded that distinction into our heads so I'm always aware of it. Same with lose/loose and to/too, as you mention. And for that matter, accept vs. except! In graduate school, I even saw someone who had posted a sign for something (can't recall offhand the subject matter), which said "Incourage others to..." (should have been ENCOURAGE others), and it always bothered me especially since that person was somewhat arrogant in my opinion. Oh, and call me a little old fashioned, but I don't much care for the use of "indexes" for the plural of index, even though now that's considered correct and acceptable. I still use "indices". It's (haha!) similar to when I took Calculus in high school, the instructor always said "I'll take a point off for every missed 'dx' and point off for every missed '+ C' for the constant in the solution of an indefinite integral!" And he meant it. Mathematical punctuation, if you will! Sorry for the diversion, now back to some weather! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 NAM looks like 06Z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattie g Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I'd feel a lot better about the means "showing the way" if Wes or Ian (or one of the other red tags) wandered through and said there was more reason to be optimistic about them doing that this time than the other times this winter that that has not worked out for us. Ian's waiting for you to pour your bowl of Corn Flakes before he can piss in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.