Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Off we go, Tracking the Friday All In Storm/NADS


stormtracker

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 995
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This is pretty much a 1 to 3, 2 to 4 "storm". Lets just ride with that and accept it as maybe an appetizer for the storm after?

here is the problem...Feb 2010, i got 5 inches in ONE hour. This year, i cant get 5 inches for the entire winter. So yea..it sucks. i feel like the ohio valley getting nickeled and dime. We are the east coast baby...we have an ocean and the gulf to help us get qpf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

here is the problem...Feb 2010, i got 5 inches in ONE hour. This year, i cant get 5 inches for the entire winter. So yea..it sucks. i feel like the ohio valley getting nickeled and dime. We are the east coast baby...we have an ocean and the gulf to help us get qpf.

Ji... it's not 2010 and last winter was a once in a decade thing. The sooner you realize that, the sooner you wont feel so disappointed by only getting 2 inches rather than 22.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been consistently thinking 1-3 for DCA and BWI... a general blend of the last few days worth of runs seems to support that idea. RIC could come in around 0.5" with some mixing, NoVA looking at around an inch... map coming in a few hours :D

EDIT: Going to say that 0.5" snow at RIC is an "at best" forecast, with likelier solution being mixed/rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the NAM can just hold this would definitely be a 2-4" event for the area considering ratios; I'm happy w/that

what's really driving me nuts, however, are the models jumping around

I am still feeling 2 for DCA and 4 for us. The same Bozo in Elkton that keeps getting the "jackpot" in these little events will measure 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been consistently thinking 1-3 for DCA and BWI... a general blend of the last few days worth of runs seems to support that idea. RIC could come in around 0.5" with some mixing, NoVA looking at around an inch... map coming in a few hours :D

cant wait to see your thoughts on the PSUHoffman storm :snowman::gun_bandana::axe:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not the issue.

Wes posting about how the storm looks bad from a meteorological standpoint is fine. Any met or experienced hobbyist doing this is OK.

But how many worthless posts about how things suck do we need to see from weenies? You all literally suck the life and fun out of this board. You think things are bad, we get that. You think the storm will blow, great. I got nothing against folks expressing that.

Say it once and move on.

OK then, make it so everyone is allowed one post per storm. That would be a blast. I mean, after each model run, people in the snow camp repeatedly give their opinion on why they think it will snow and how much, so I see it no different that people in the other camp can't do the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been consistently thinking 1-3 for DCA and BWI... a general blend of the last few days worth of runs seems to support that idea. RIC could come in around 0.5" with some mixing, NoVA looking at around an inch... map coming in a few hours :D

Yes you have. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK then, make it so everyone is allowed one post per storm. That would be a blast. I mean, after each model run, people in the snow camp repeatedly give their opinion on why they think it will snow and how much, so I see it no different that people in the other camp can't do the same thing.

You're missing the point entirely. He's trying to quell the downers who are complaining for the sake of complaining, rather than giving actual evidence as to why something will or will not occur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if the NAM can just hold this would definitely be a 2-4" event for the area considering ratios; I'm happy w/that

what's really driving me nuts, however, are the models jumping around

That's me. I went to bed last night thinking that the models were coming into some alignment, some consistency between runs, then BAM. Total changes, big jumps between runs. Maybe today into tonight we get some consistency going again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK then, make it so everyone is allowed one post per storm. That would be a blast. I mean, after each model run, people in the snow camp repeatedly give their opinion on why they think it will snow and how much, so I see it no different that people in the other camp can't do the same thing.

You seemed to miss Randy's point about the constant "this winter sucks", "we never get snow", "storm cancel" posts bring the board down. Who wants to read that crap?

If you (or anyone else for that matter) wishes to punt this system because they are not happy with two inches, say so and move the f on. Don't continue to post about a system that isn't exciting enough for you.

I fully believe there are some people who read this forum who will gladly take whatever snow they can get, but they are not posting because they will get trolled for it. I've seen numerous posters respond to such posts with "really? you are happy with only two inches?!" like being happy with two inches is a crime. It's unfortunate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the topic of disappointment...I would argue that the only real thing this year which has been disappointing is the number of "near misses" that "could have been". Several events have had good potential here even within a couple of days of their occurrence, only to fade in this area to a 1-2" amount. However, as frustrating as that is, it's been cold this winter which actually is part of the reason we've even had any events to follow around here. I, for one, would not trade that for a blowtorch over the next couple of months. We do still have about a week left in January, all of February, and into the first part of March in the DC area to realistically get at least one good storm. Not saying that will happen, but I'd much prefer to continue seeing an overall cold pattern that could support snow events throughout much or all of that time. I found it suckier to deal with a winter like 2001-02 or 2007-08, when there essentially were no real chances for anything here and the pattern was awful.

Just my 2-cents to put a little more optimism in things, despite this upcoming event possibly being a disappointment.:snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're missing the point entirely. He's trying to quell the downers who are complaining for the sake of complaining, rather than giving actual evidence as to why something will or will not occur.

Well, I would concur with that, except he said it in reply to my post, and I have given reasoning for my thinking more than once, and am not one who "complains for rthe sake of complaining."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not the issue.

Wes posting about how the storm looks bad from a meteorological standpoint is fine. Any met or experienced hobbyist doing this is OK.

But how many worthless posts about how things suck do we need to see from weenies? You all literally suck the life and fun out of this board. You think things are bad, we get that. You think the storm will blow, great. I got nothing against folks expressing that.

Say it once and move on.

Can I get a mother-****ing amen?

AMEN! :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...