Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

NYC/PHL Jan 17-19 Forecast Discussion


am19psu

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 620
  • Created
  • Last Reply

NWS may end up looking awfully foolish if they end up upgrading to WSW or ICW late tonight for most of the area. I realize that in the technical info they release that is read by mets and others like us they are covering themselves by leaving the door open but to the general public it will look like a blown forecast.

The 06Z GFS is showing the sfc never getting above frreezing even at EWR. I wouldn't be so quick to say that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These events usually come in 2 forms...the ones where you go snow to rain very fast, sometimes not even seeing more than maybe 1-2 hours of snow if that....the other is a prolonged period of snow, sometimes 4-6 hours where you can see as much as 4-5 inches, then maybe 2-3 hours of sleet/freezing rain and then rain....this one I think relies tremendously on when the precipitation gets in, if it arrives by 04-05Z I would not be surprised if we saw 2-4 inches of snow in the NYC area, if it doesnt start til 07-08Z it will be much harder.

thank you for your response

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 06Z GFS is showing the sfc never getting above frreezing even at EWR. I wouldn't be so quick to say that.

What I meant is that the event has largely been down played by the local mets the last few days and if 1-3" of snow and a trace of ice ends up as 4-8" of snow and 0.25" - 0.50" of ice the general public will think the forecast was a bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I meant is that the event has largely been down played by the local mets the last few days and if 1-3" of snow and a trace of ice ends up as 4-8" of snow and 0.25" - 0.50" of ice the general public will think the forecast was a bust.

Oh, I thought you were saying the reverse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks...didn't think it would be that warm that in Berks that early.

We'll see if that happens, like others have talked about with the 6z GFS, it stays colder longer in RDG...

its probably going to be somewhere in the 14z-16z range if you blend the models

Here were the 6z temps from earlier...definetely a much colder scenario.....

READING

KRDG GFS MOS GUIDANCE 1/17/2011 0600 UTC

12z Tue: 25

15z Tue: 30

18z Tue: 33

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HRRR has the precip arriving earlier than all the models are predicting. FWIW this model nailed the timing of the back edge of the precip for last week's storm.

post-611-0-21411000-1295278012.png

Would an earlier start mean more snow before a changeover?

@ Parsley - What are you thinking for down this way, seems were on the fence (as usual)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HRRR has the precip arriving earlier than all the models are predicting. FWIW this model nailed the timing of the back edge of the precip for last week's storm.

post-611-0-21411000-1295278012.png

One of the mets in the New England thread mentioned how this is an event where "west is best" in more ways than one...the dry air nosing from the high could cause precip to arrive later the more east you are...you can sort of see how the snow advances further north in the western areas....we saw this even in the 2/6 storm where parts of Warren county saw more snow that NYC did since they were a bit less influenced by the confluence and suppression.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly enough, my point and click forecast in Morris County now calls for a high of 36 which has been increased. It also basically indicates a smooth transistion to rain with no ice around 10am. Yet, the AFD continues to indicate the heavy snow/ice potential for NJ. Not sure what they are thinking here when most of the guidance has been indicating a colder scenario. Upton is indicating almost 0.25" of ice one town over to the east of me. I live right on the border of Morris and Passaic Counties. Sounds like their is some differnces in thinking between the two offices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are 12Z NAM Bufkit snowfall and freezing rain outputs respectively for selected locations:

KHPN: 1.8", .01"

KSWF: 3.2", .46"

KPOU: 2.5", .26"

KMMU: 3.9", .11"

KJFK: 1.5", .00"

KLGA: 1.6", .02"

KTEB: 2.6", .11"

KEWR: 2.7", .00"

RUTG: 2.8", .04"

KTTN: 3.9", .07"

KPNE: 3.8", .03"

KABE: 3.4", .25"

KRDG: 4.1", .25"

KBDR: 1.2", .11"

KISP: 0.3", .00"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here are 12Z NAM Bufkit snowfall and freezing rain outputs respectively for selected locations:

KHPN: 1.8", .01"

KSWF: 3.2", .46"

KPOU: 2.5", .26"

KMMU: 3.9", .11"

KJFK: 1.5", .00"

KLGA: 1.6", .02"

KTEB: 2.6", .11"

KEWR: 2.7", .00"

RUTG: 2.8", .04"

KTTN: 3.9", .07"

KPNE: 3.8", .03"

KABE: 3.4", .25"

KRDG: 4.1", .25"

KBDR: 1.2", .11"

KISP: 0.3", .00"

The 12z nam came in much wetter than the 00z run here at KSWF. The 00z had .87 now the 12z has 1.42

Link to comment
Share on other sites

slightly colder than 6z and much colder than the NAM

Considering how poorly the GFS preformed with the last system, im a bit hesitant on buying what its selling

The GFS is usually bad with these sort of events, generally it underdoes the WAA which results in it being too cold and often starting the precip too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...