Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,600
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

JAN 20th-22nd potential..


NaoPos

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 983
  • Created
  • Last Reply

hr 162 sub 1004 low about 25-50 miles north of hse..

hr 168 996 low about 50 miles east of acy

hr 162 hvy snow from dc to phl

hr 168 hvy snow dc to ilg...very heavy snow from phl to just outside nyc

850 and frz line run from delaware canal to nyc

Don't think ive ever heard you use the words "Very heavy snow" haha :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you think without the Euro's bias to hold the energy back that the storm that goes OTS would hit us, with no second storm?

That's exactly what I was thinking. Can we even look at the type of solution where all other guidance has that first storm coming out where the Euro holds back the energy since that's its bias?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's exactly what I was thinking. Can we even look at the type of solution where all other guidance has that first storm coming out where the Euro holds back the energy since that's its bias?

Exactly...I think it's going to be the first storm that hits us, these events tend to consolidate as we approach them, and the ECM has a noted bias of leaving too much shortwave energy behind in the SW. All guidance does seem to be latching onto the threat of significant winter weather next weekend, however, with the possibility of a large Nor'easter. Another MECS would just be incredible considering the winter we've had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not sure why people are saying no other model has this,,, 12z GFS has a storm, but doing it's SE thing...canadian brushes us..,, Plus, it's the EURO. does it really need other model support when it shows a storm 3 runs in a row?

While the exact solution will vary considering we're 162hrs out, gotta like the potential in this time period. That's all you can ask for this far out

OT, the bears .seahawks game is snowy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks good inland, close call for big cities

The Euro's temperature profile looks a bit suspect given the offshore track of the low....you'd probably see the 0C line about 50 miles SE of where the ECM actually has it. The Euro's two main biases are holding too much energy back in the SW and being too warm at 850mb in the longer range. So there's a lot of changes that will happen as we approach this event with a solution like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not sure why people are saying no other model has this,,, 12z GFS has a storm, but doing it's SE thing...canadian brushes us..,, Plus, it's the EURO. does it really need other model support when it shows a storm 3 runs in a row?

While the exact solution will vary considering we're 162hrs out, gotta like the potential in this time period. That's all you can ask for this far out

OT, the bears .seahawks game is snowy!

Keep in mind that the GFS & GGEM have a storm not just south and east (GFS) and basically east (GGEM)

But also at an earlier time frame.....the one around 120 -132 hrs...

This on the ECM is about 30 hrs later and is created out of the models bias of holding energy back...

If that energy is not "held back" you have no storm in the 168 hr time frame....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes but, at this point it doesn't really matter. It's probably not happening.

Why Not ? Last 2 storms showing huge hits like this a week away turned out to be major Snowstorms..Not saying it will be a rip roaring Blizzard from Philly to Boston but Potential is defiantly there and other Models have also shown signs as well..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind that the GFS & GGEM have a storm not just south and east (GFS) and basically east (GGEM)

But also at an earlier time frame.....the one around 120 -132 hrs...

true. but it was also the EURO that sniffed out the later start time on the 12/26 event... point is, keep all options open at this point and time

This on the ECM is about 30 hrs later and is created out of the models bias of holding energy back...

If that energy is not "held back" you have no storm in the 168 hr time frame....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...