Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,598
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    PublicWorks143
    Newest Member
    PublicWorks143
    Joined

Potential February Analogs, Based on Ongoing Snowfall


Nikolai

Recommended Posts

So far, both December and January have featured snowfall in excess of 10" at Central Park (20.1" and 10.8, respectively). While not unheard of, this amount of snow this early in the year is fairly unusual, so I looked back at other winters featuring 10"+ in both December and February to see if there is any connection with February and March's snowfall.

Winter featuring 10"+ in both D/J, February snowfall, March snowfall

1872-73: 18.8", .4"

1876-77: .4", 6.5"

1880-81: 8.8", 2.3"

1883-84: 8.0", 2.3"

1896-97: 11.0", 3.3"

1904-05: 5.8", 1.8"

1917-18: 3.7", .6"

1947-48: 13.6", 4.7"

1960-61: 18.2", 1.2"

1963-64: 14.1", 6.0"

1995-96: 21.2", 13.2"

2003-04: .7", 4.8"

Average February snowfall in winters where D/J both saw 10"+ is 10.4", while average March snow is 3.9". The median #s are 9.9" for February and 2.8" in March.

While this is plainly an instance of using selective data with no true correlation, there does seem to be a tendency for winters featuring snowy December and January couplets to have snowy Februarys as well. While 4/12 Februarys saw under 6", 8/12 saw 8"+ and 5/12 saw a foot or more of snow. The lowest winter total even supports additional snow after January is over, as 03-04 saw 5.5" of additional snow (17-18 had snow in April).

I'd say that purely based on past instances of snowy Decembers and Januarys in the same winter, there is a significantly higher likelihood than normal that February comes out snowier than average while March is relatively lackluster, although even without anymore January snow (and I do think we'll see more snow this month), the combination of the two will likely put NYC over 40" for the winter, especially given February's recent proclivity for being NYC's snowiest month on average, with the Februarys of the 2000s averaging 13.3". Given all of this, I think NYC's chance of seeing a snowy (10"+) February is significantly higher than normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given all of this, I think NYC's chance of seeing a snowy (10"+) February is significantly higher than normal.

I agree. Some figures:

New York City: December snowfall of 18" or more:

- 7/7 (100%) cases had 40" or more seasonal snowfall

- Mean seasonal snowfall: 51.2"

- Median seasonal snowfall: 48.1"

- 7/7 (100%) cases with January-April snowfall of 20" or more

- 2/7 (29%) cases with January-April snowfall of 30" or more

- Mean January-April snowfall: 27.2"

- Median January-April snowfall: 26.0"

- January: 6/7 (86%) cases with 10" or more snowfall; Climatology: 32% cases (1869-1870 through 2009-2010)

- February: 4/7 (57%) cases with 10" or more snowfall; Climatology: 35% cases (1869-1870 through 2009-2010)

- January and February: 3/7 (43%) cases with 10" or more snowfall in each month; Climatology: 11% cases (1869-1870 through 2009-2010)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Some figures:

New York City: December snowfall of 18" or more:

- 7/7 (100%) cases had 40" or more seasonal snowfall

- Mean seasonal snowfall: 51.2"

- Median seasonal snowfall: 48.1"

- 7/7 (100%) cases with January-April snowfall of 20" or more

- 2/7 (29%) cases with January-April snowfall of 30" or more

- Mean January-April snowfall: 27.2"

- Median January-April snowfall: 26.0"

- January: 6/7 (86%) cases with 10" or more snowfall; Climatology: 32% cases (1869-1870 through 2009-2010)

- February: 4/7 (57%) cases with 10" or more snowfall; Climatology: 35% cases (1869-1870 through 2009-2010)

- January and February: 3/7 (43%) cases with 10" or more snowfall in each month; Climatology: 11% cases (1869-1870 through 2009-2010)

I was hoping I'd see you here, your agreement makes me feel validated! :thumbsup::snowman:

Also: NYC's snowcover statistics are very impressive for this early in the winter. I'll find the thread where the data is, but this winter is looking (to me, at least) like it could end up with one of the largest counts of continuous days featuring 1"+ snowcover (or even total days). We're at 18 days as of today, and I'd feel comfortable saying we'll reach 23 continuous days at a very minimum (and that is assuming the D4-5 threat turns out the worst way possible). This is a very impressive statistic, IMO, and shows that while we haven't seen severe cold, we've been abnormally low enough to have a winter more akin to somewhere Upstate than the city. The piles of snow today look as if we just had a much more significant storm than we did, given all the remaining snow from the previous events this winter.

Should we stay majority or all snow for the D4-5 event, I think there's a very good chance we see at least 10 continuous days of 4"+ snowcover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...