Ajdos Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 If you don't like it, go live on the east coast. Quit your f'in whining. Excuse me, but who the F**k is whining anyways, I'm just talking reality here.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMIweather Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 I recall a certain system in which a couple days before it we had 30% pops, and ended up with 5"...ring a bell? Obviously doesn't count...the GFS a week out showed a bomb for SEMI so I think that makes the 5" a bust by comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajdos Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 NAM should be discontinued beyond 24 hours. I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerball Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 Let's face it, most areas in the SE of Wisconsin-Iowa-Kansas (in the Midwest) have yet to see a storm produce more than 6" this season. In fact, the same outlined region has had two season back to back filled with nothing but nickel & dime events, so surely it's only fair to expect some frustration with this pattern we've been stuck in. For some people a snowpack does nothing when the price is having to suffer through a relatively dry pattern. It's different strokes for different folks. Why can't we just accept that and move on to more important things? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMIweather Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 NAM should be discontinued beyond 24 hours. I thought it did decent for the Tuesday Storm, someone correct me if I'm wrong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 You've been complaning for the past 20 mins. How is that not whining? Seriously, who the hell cares if you get snow or not. It's not like you can control it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmc76 Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 I thought it did decent for the Tuesday Storm, someone correct me if I'm wrong... Im going to have to agree^^^ the NAM was spot on 48 hrs out. For good laugh to calm this thread down check this out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajdos Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 Im going to have to agree^^^ the NAM was spot on 48 hrs out. For good laugh to calm this thread down check this out ROFL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 I thought it did decent for the Tuesday Storm, someone correct me if I'm wrong... At this point with that storm the NAM was way too amplified with that storm. It actually tried to bring the sfc reflection into SE MI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 You've been complaning for the past 20 mins. How is that not whining? Seriously, who the hell cares if you get snow or not. It's not like you can control it. Stay on topic man, we don't need to have this become an argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 Im going to have to agree^^^ the NAM was spot on 48 hrs out. For good laugh to calm this thread down check this out What I wrote above may have been closer to 60 hours. But nevertheless, NAM went too far the other way with it being too suppressed until at the last minute it finally catched on. Of course, I'm viewing this through IMBY lenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 Stay on topic man, we don't need to have this become an argument. Stebo for moderator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 How is him complaning about him not getting snow staying on topic? Not trying to start ****, but it gets annoying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 How is him complaning about him not getting snow staying on topic? Not trying to start ****, but it gets annoying. He probably meant it for the both of you. And on the topic of administrative matters, somebody should start a PART II thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajdos Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 At this point with that storm the NAM was way too amplified with that storm. It actually tried to bring the sfc reflection into SE MI. Yeah, I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 Everyone chill a little...we're better than this. This should be a storm talk thread...about this storm. Want to complain about winter? Start a new thread or visit the OT thread. Want to talk about EC storms? Go to the NYC or SNE forum. Cool? Cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevo6899 Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 Im going to have to agree^^^ the NAM was spot on 48 hrs out. For good laugh to calm this thread down check this out LOL almost as good as the hitler video. You make this? I think the gfs will have some surprises later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Powerball Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 Part 2... http://www.americanwx.com/bb/index.php?/topic/9097-january-17-19th-plainsmwlakes-storm-potential/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dmc76 Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 LOL almost as good as the hitler video. You make this? I think the gfs will have some surprises later. Yes I did...If your not laughing your not living Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 He probably meant it for the both of you. And on the topic of administrative matters, somebody should start a PART II thread. Ya I did mean both should have signified that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.