Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,703
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Climax
    Newest Member
    Climax
    Joined

Coastal Storm Potential - Jan 11-12 II


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Fun to look at, but tossing this one. The changes at SIX HOURS in are hilarious. We'll see what the GFS and the 00z runs bring. But this run looks like 100% pure crap

:lol: so you think it's good?

the good thing for a lot of the area (folks like you in CNE who nearly slid down a slide of razor blades this morning) is regardless of whether this run verifies or not most folks in S/CNE can feel pretty good that they aren't going to see it vaporize and only end up with a T-2" type of deal. the nuances of who gets what aren't ready to be pinned down quite yet but a lot of the people who post in here are going to do OK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, it's a tough solution to buy given the disparity between the 12z run even at 6h. I wouldn't mind it verifying though. That would be some uber snowfall rates.

It jumped towards the GFS but right after h12 it deviates quickly. The NAM continues to prove even in this new "easier" pattern it's totally unable to place vorticity even in the short range among a lot of other problems. It's totally useless as this point outside of 12 hours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah DS gets to ORH and near ASH, but not before a massive snow bomb..lol.

It does have comma head resemblance to Dec '05.

post-33-0-86757300-1294691172.gif

I was just looking at the H5/H7 omega and RH up here too. I think there would be some surprisingly hefty totals up here if this verified, but it's unlikely. This will be one of those storms where we'll see which mets lean more toward the NAM or the globals.:scooter:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lower levels must be fricken cold if 12-18 fingers all the way down to PYM with that typically unfavorable track for se mass

the product that jerry is using is kinda crappy (i have it too and it's just an algorithm made by the modelers...it isn't particularly detailed or anything like that) it even has like 2 to 4" on ACK on that run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd take this solution. Probably 2-3/hour for 6 hours or more before any dryslot and verbatim it actually occludes before it happens.

It does toss us 1.75", but I dislike the trend close to a dryslot on recent runs of the NAM.

Thankfully, it seems to be on the extreme end of the full set of model solutions; the overall consensus has us in a spot I rather like.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the product that jerry is using is kinda crappy (i have it too and it's just an algorithm made by the modelers...it isn't particularly detailed or anything like that) it even has like 2 to 4" on ACK on that run.

Right. But the BL temps are also surprising cold everywhere west of the low center so that lends credence to me at least in part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right. But the BL temps are also surprising cold everywhere west of the low center so that lends credence to me at least in part.

yeah...i wasn't saying your a fool to use it at all. verbatim it would probably work out right for a good chunk of the zone. i was just responding to his post. the 925 temps get above 0C all the way past the canal on that run so it would be hard to envision the 8 inches it had out here or whatever it was...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just looking at the H5/H7 omega and RH up here too. I think there would be some surprisingly hefty totals up here if this verified, but it's unlikely. This will be one of those storms where we'll see which mets lean more toward the NAM or the globals.:scooter:

Really, It takes a similar track to the 06z and last nights 00z run up the coast but it goes about 100 miles further NNE once it reaches SNE before it heads ENE...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah...i wasn't saying your a fool to use it at all. verbatim it would probably work out right for a good chunk of the zone. i was just responding to his post. the 925 temps get above 0C all the way past the canal on that run so it would be hard to envision the 8 inches it had out here or whatever it was...

Warm layers elsewhere too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah...i wasn't saying your a fool to use it at all. verbatim it would probably work out right for a good chunk of the zone. i was just responding to his post. the 925 temps get above 0C all the way past the canal on that run so it would be hard to envision the 8 inches it had out here or whatever it was...

Thanks. I could envision a quick 4-7" dump before any changeover with that type of track. Probably 2-5 for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...