MaineJayhawk Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:50 AM, weathafella said: This will struggle to come inside of the BM it looks like. Agreed. Tons of dislike here. Boooooo. Cape can celebrate this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:50 AM, Max said: Why does everyone always want to bash on the Connecticut River Valley, it's not like there are 2000' mountains on either side of it in Ct. Ryan if you could, is the Ct Valley really a screw zone more often than not or is this just a myth? myth lol It's been perpetuated the last few years by just some awfully unlucky storms for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:49 AM, weathafella said: Well I've seen through 48 hours....first global in is doing the b**ch slap it would seem.... THe GFS at first glance is very similar to the RGEM at 48 hours. b**ch slap commence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:51 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: I don't think it's early to be posting maps depicting 8-12"...that is very likely. GFS slaps the NAM down, as we thought; EURO to follow suite. I've only seen to 48, but I like the sounds of that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 gfs givin the old b slap! loving it! nam solution was a little too amped for southern areas anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpickett79 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:51 AM, Dave5 said: i like snow. awesome first post. welcome. we do to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 I'm shocked the NAM has been put in its place lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:53 AM, NorEastermass128 said: I've only seen to 48, but I like the sounds of that... The GFS probably won't be great for us verbatim, but the good news is that the truth will lie in between. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 UKMET is no NAM. RGEM tonight is NO NAM. GFS tonight is NO NAM. Only NAM is the NAM. I won't stay up but Euro will be no NAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:54 AM, ctsnowstorm628 said: gfs givin the old b slap! loving it! nam solution was a little too amped for southern areas anyway... Yeah appears so. I want to throw out again because I knwo the thread is flying...the RGEM and GFS are very similar through 48 in my opinion pending the better res/color RGEM maps. The NAM just turns into a shi* show every run 36/42 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 through 60hrs decent snow up to the pike, but nothing, and i mean NOTHING like the nam at the surface atleast Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boston-winter08 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:55 AM, weathafella said: UKMET is no NAM. RGEM tonight is NO NAM. GFS tonight is NO NAM. Only NAM is the NAM. I won't stay up but Euro will be no NAM. How's UK? more NW from 12z? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:55 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: The GFS probably won't be great for us verbatim, but the good news is that the truth will lie in between. Yeah. NAM jackpots HFD-ORH-CON. GFS will jackpot CC. In between...PVD-BOS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Just east of the benchmark Here's my forecast now Pete...all kidding aside.... somewhere around the benchmark give or take a few miles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HIPPYVALLEY Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:50 AM, Max said: Why does everyone always want to bash on the Connecticut River Valley, it's not like there are 2000' mountains on either side of it in Ct. Ryan if you could, is the Ct Valley really a screw zone more often than not or is this just a myth? Agreed. There are so many variables in the Valley. When you get up towards Greenfield/Turners Falls the topography is a lot tighter and not subject to the same dynamics as lets say Springfield. According to the Greenfield DPW the 40 year average for annual snowfall here is 54". Hardly a screw zone. It's convenient to blame the Valley but honestly most of SW NH and S. VT have their share of bad winters and that is certainly not due to any sort of Ct River Valley snow hole. Or is it? - lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 wow GFS is awfully far east lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Nice snowstorm on the GFS and UKMET but I admit the NAM was kind of fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cpickett79 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:51 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: GFS slaps the NAM down, as we thought; EURO to follow suite. well i don't mind if the gfs slaps the nam but there is more room for a less amped less QPF System then us getting royally screwed via the nam moving more NW... so i don't want this to really move SE more than a hair. 0z nam looked damm fine to me. clown maps should give me 18 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 It's pretty far east. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:56 AM, NorEastermass128 said: Yeah. NAM jackpots HFD-ORH-CON. GFS will jackpot CC. In between...PVD-BOS. I love how your amounts are always equal to or greater than mine. 4" ahead of me this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nutmegfriar Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Any p-type issues on the CT shore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 gfs gives HFD-HVN-ORH south and east a good, solid 6-10" with 12+" on the cape Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leesun Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Not with the east track of the GFS On 1/10/2011 at 3:59 AM, nutmegfriar said: Any p-type issues on the CT shore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ctsnowstorm628 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:59 AM, nutmegfriar said: Any p-type issues on the CT shore? on the nam yeah we flip to rain. gfs nope 6-10" all snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:58 AM, cpickett79 said: well i don't mind if the gfs slaps the nam but there is more room for a less amped less QPF System then us getting royally screwed via the nam moving more NW... so i don't want this to really move SE more than a hair. 0z nam looked damm fine to me. clown maps should give me 18 We wouldn't get 18" if that soloution verified.....the mid level centers were too far west. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:57 AM, CT Rain said: wow GFS is awfully far east lol Ryan...not to be like Kev but AWT? It's still ripping at the time of this snapshot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:56 AM, Boston-winter08 said: How's UK? more NW from 12z? Obviously we're missing qpf as these are 6 hour outputs...... UKMET kind of sucks as a model imho but it is what it is.... 60 hours D3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boston-winter08 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:58 AM, cpickett79 said: well i don't mind if the gfs slaps the nam but there is more room for a less amped less QPF System then us getting royally screwed via the nam moving more NW... so i don't want this to much further SE. 0z nam looked damm fine to me. clown maps should give me 18 I still think the NAM COULD be on to something, though there is a low chance, especially considering the pattern this winter thus far that said, the slp position on the NAM would almost certainly involve a mix out to 495 (like fox25 is calling for now, with heaviest snow worcester on west) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorEastermass128 Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:58 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: I love how your amounts are always equal to or greater than mine. 4" ahead of me this year. You beat me Dec 22-23 by 0.5" I was just closer to the best band in the 12/26 storm as I'm 10 miles SE of you...Wilmington is just a relative snow hole. BOS sits at 25.5" right now. Me...just 18.7". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
W1WFG Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 On 1/10/2011 at 3:46 AM, Happy Valley said: I don't get these bold snow maps being issued by the Boston mets 2 days out. Just asking to get burned imo. Like Washington political reporters, still trying to find the next Watergate, and fame. Everyone wants to call the next February '78 -- thirty-plus years on, both groups are still trying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.