Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,866
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Paulwen45
    Newest Member
    Paulwen45
    Joined

Coastal Storm Potential - Jan 11-12 II


Baroclinic Zone

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  On 1/10/2011 at 3:01 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Looks like the max from my area into sw ME is cf attributed on the NAM.....I agree that there would be a max RELATIVE to ene, but not as compared to w ne.

I agree with Ryan that qpf is too heavy in the east if this were to play out and it's underdone in GC.

Yeah verbatim you'd expect a GC/Litchfield Hills jackpot in this track. But since it's probably too far west it's not that important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2011 at 3:00 AM, MaineJayhawk said:

The pertinent panels would be prob'ly just before 11:00 I'd guess. And though I know they'll be south of ACK, I need to see them, so I'll be joining in on it.

Yeah, Need to see if you go to sleep counting snowflakes or counting storm whiffs........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2011 at 2:58 AM, cpickett79 said:

i see why your saying that but reading john's post's earlier give it credence. BTW Ray i owe u 20$ At the gtg.

He made valid points, but whatever validity the NAM held has been negated by it's wild swings imo......I'm also still hedging WEST of the globals by hedging on a track near ACK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2011 at 2:57 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I'll bet on every other piece of guidance....call me crazy, but.....

Who knows it could all come in the same. The RGEM doesn't look all that much different early on...but it's been 42-48 where the nam has gone off the rails most of the time.

Here's a question for the pros. Where is all the vorticity coming from on the NAM at 500 between 42-54. I mean it just goes epic nuts from N.S to N.D over a couple of thousand miles. I can't recall ever seeing that in my life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2011 at 2:58 AM, cpickett79 said:

i see why your saying that but reading john's post's earlier give it credence. BTW Ray i owe u 20$ At the gtg.

Maybe but one man's opinion over a totally different run is silly to simply ride without thinking it through. Just because we never had a "ku" during a strong Nina didn't preclude one 2 weeks ago which dumped a foot on Philly, 2 feet on NYC, and 18 inches on Boston.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree. Especially with all the misses as of late.

  On 1/10/2011 at 3:09 AM, Happy Valley said:

Personally I feel it's ridiculous for them to be issuing a map like that over 48 hours out from go time. At least wait until the overnight global's come in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...