Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,603
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

NYC/PHL Potential Jan 11-14 Event Discussion Part Two


NickD2011

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 998
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Tombo,

Do you have any 850 data you can interpolate? Coastal NJ anf LI have been dealing with the mixing dilemma all night. Thanks!

850s are not an issue for the Euro for Coastal NJ or LI. Surface temps get close to 32 for the coastal areas but I don't think it would be a major issue. That's my take ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

prob 3-6 with standard 10-1

He'd do better than 10-1 dude...GFS shows sub 528 thicknesses over eastern PA and he's got a ton of elevation. He's probably looking at 4-8" easily on this run, potentially more. I'd imagine ratios would be around 12:1 here in Westchester County with 15:1 in the mountains of eastern PA.

The Norlun event Friday had nearly 20:1 ratios in CT.

The only problem for Hazelton will be if the low shifts east a little bit and they end up on the outskirts of the main banding, where snow is not as steady.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He'd do better than 10-1 dude...GFS shows sub 528 thicknesses over eastern PA and he's got a ton of elevation. He's probably looking at 4-8" easily on this run, potentially more. I'd imagine ratios would be around 12:1 here in Westchester County with 15:1 in the mountains of eastern PA.

The Norlun event Friday had nearly 20:1 ratios in CT.

The only problem for Hazelton will be if the low shifts east a little bit and they end up on the outskirts of the main banding, where snow is not as steady.

thats y i just said 3-6 cause i dont know what ratios would be...you dont even know what the exact qpf would be for him...so thats why i just put it a moot 10-1 standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats y i just said 3-6 cause i dont know what ratios would be...you dont even know what the exact qpf would be for him...so thats why i just put it a moot 10-1 standard.

No one knows the exact QPF for the storm yet, obviously....but there's a big difference in coastal climatology regarding ratios and climatology in the Poconos. My family has a house in extreme NE PA at 1500' elevation where I've spent a ton of time, and snowstorms are often much fluffier there with surface temperatures being colder than NYC by about 10F in winter, as well as elevation enhancement on most wind directions from the start of the Allegheny Plateau. You can't use 10:1 ratios for the Poconos as they often bang out way more. This looks like a fairly cold storm to me, just a shade warmer than 12/26, with NYC probably in the mid 20s and the Poconos in the upper teens to low 20s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anything else of interest on the 0z ECM? How does the Arctic front play out?

after this event, we get a glancing shot of cold air with some lgt snows around 190....after that its a swfe with ice, then after that cutter with warm temps out ahead of that and brutal cold behind...one thing i have seen is the models have really veered awy from the big arctic outbreak that was show. now its just a glancing blow really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after this event, we get a glancing shot of cold air with some lgt snows around 190....after that its a swfe with ice, then after that cutter with warm temps out ahead of that and brutal cold behind...one thing i have seen is the models have really veered awy from the big arctic outbreak that was show. now its just a glancing blow really.

I think the cold is going to move in after the cutter at hour 240. -25C 850s are hitting MN/WI; if a trough amplifies as it would with a cutter, we'll easily get hit with at least -15C and probably much colder. That PV in Canada is eventually going to deliver cold air to the East; I believe this is a case of "delayed but not denied."

Also, the two days after the storm have 850s around -11C and -12C; that's going to be plenty cold with strong NW flow and good radiational cooling due to the fresh snowpack. We'll probably see some single digits in the outlying suburbs of LI and NJ, with highs struggling to reach the mid 20s outside of NYC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the cold is going to move in after the cutter at hour 240. -25C 850s are hitting MN/WI; if a trough amplifies as it would with a cutter, we'll easily get hit with at least -15C and probably much colder. That PV in Canada is eventually going to deliver cold air to the East; I believe this is a case of "delayed but not denied."

Also, the two days after the storm have 850s around -11C and -12C; that's going to be plenty cold with strong NW flow and good radiational cooling due to the fresh snowpack. We'll probably see some single digits in the outlying suburbs of LI and NJ, with highs struggling to reach the mid 20s outside of NYC.

yea, not doubt its going to be cold, im just saying the models are backing off on the sub 504 thickness diving down into the northeast like they were showing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Monster NAO block showing up on the ECM at Day 10:

LR is honestly looking great...we may have to deal with snow-->rain ahead of the arctic front, but then it's brutal cold with a great -NAO. Honestly no signs of the pattern breaking down.

i wouldnt say monster, it looks pretty weakly negative...the 500 mb hgts are like 534, and its not pinching in like a true block, a good block for us is over baffin island, and its deff not shown at that hr. Plus the pac looks blah, no ridge on the west coast, the flow is right off the pacific.

test8.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i wouldnt say monster, it looks pretty weakly negative...the 500 mb hgts are like 534, and its not pinching in like a true block, a good block for us is over baffin island, and its deff not shown at that hr. Plus the pac looks blah, no ridge on the east coast, the flow is right off the pacific.

Posting the means is irrelevant because we all know the -NAO is breaking down after this storm, so that's going to dilute the appearance of the block's formation at Day 9/10.

At Day 10 on the 0z ECM, we've got a 534dm closed ridge over Central Greenland, definitely a significant height anomaly. You can clearly see the block moving west and starting to push into Baffin Island...if you look at the Northern Hemisphere 500mb map:

By the way, we don't mind a strong Pacific flow when we have a brutally cold airmass in Canada, as this can set the stage for some good overrunning and SW flow events. Of course I live a bit further north than you, so my perspective might be different as I'm more likely to hold snow in a gradient pattern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I find kind of scary is that all the models at 72 hours are virtually in the same spot ...

00z NOGAPS

Different map used from the others but just noticing primary and secondary

00z GFS maybe a little north

UKMET

GGEM

ECM

Considering that one of them has the most progressive SE bias...they all seem to be agreeing at this point and time on positioning...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...