Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

The Jan 9-10 Storm Part 3


MotoWeatherman

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 998
  • Created
  • Last Reply

NEGa--I read that earlier in the thread somewhere. A poster mentioned that it would probably be the 0z runs tonight before a really good specific idea on what was actually going to happen would be known. In any event you guys are pretty golden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NEGa--I read that earlier in the thread somewhere. A poster mentioned that it would probably be the 0z runs tonight before a really good specific idea on what was actually going to happen would be known. In any event you guys are pretty golden.

i am actually a little nervous again, now lol. the set up is great and high confidence etc. however, now the REAL fun begins. seeing where the storm is and its track and projected heaviest qpf as we get within 24 hours of the event and the models nail it down better. people can make snide comments on this next part, but i am really going to be paying close attention to the RUC starting mid day tomorrow. i am hoping the RUC shows what has happened before in storms, once the heaviest precip moves out, we are left with very light snow, flurries or freezing drizzle for many hours after the main event. the RUC picks it up well in n central ne ga and into the upstate (i cant really speak for its performance in other places)

then we can compare what the short range models are showing against the radar and nowcasting and figure out whats going to happen in our own back yards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you can add me in the southern foothills of WNC to the "I like that look :)

any one in ne al, all of n ga, the upstate and sw nc should be loving that look. i dont know why so many discount the RPM, iirc it hasnt done all too badly lately with our winter events. that image adds to my confidence, i have to say

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raleigh doesn't seem to see any mixing for the Triad.

Sunday Night: A slight chance of snow after 1am. Increasing clouds, with a low around 25. Light north wind. Chance of precipitation is 20%.

Monday: A chance of snow. Cloudy, with a high near 33. East wind between 3 and 7 mph. Chance of precipitation is 50%.

Monday Night: Snow likely. Cloudy, with a low around 28. Chance of precipitation is 60%.

Tuesday: A chance of snow. Cloudy, with a high near 35. Chance of precipitation is 40%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i am actually a little nervous again, now lol. the set up is great and high confidence etc. however, now the REAL fun begins. seeing where the storm is and its track and projected heaviest qpf as we get within 24 hours of the event and the models nail it down better. people can make snide comments on this next part, but i am really going to be paying close attention to the RUC starting mid day tomorrow. i am hoping the RUC shows what has happened before in storms, once the heaviest precip moves out, we are left with very light snow, flurries or freezing drizzle for many hours after the main event. the RUC picks it up well in n central ne ga and into the upstate (i cant really speak for its performance in other places)

then we can compare what the short range models are showing against the radar and nowcasting and figure out whats going to happen in our own back yards

I call that pre-storm jitters. I think all of us true weenies get this at some point before storm hits. I'm just telling myself as long as we get 4 inches i'll be happy. Anything else is just bonus.:snowman:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I have a question...we're getting most of our moisture from the ULL right? If we are, isn't there a dry slot in there and couldn't that affect us negatively by not having moisture in there...don't mean to sound stupid, but just wondering. Thanks for explaining if I'm wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I have a question...we're getting most of our moisture from the ULL right? If we are, isn't there a dry slot in there and couldn't that affect us negatively by not having moisture in there...don't mean to sound stupid, but just wondering. Thanks for explaining if I'm wrong.

There could be a dry slot but based on the past model runs, it appeared it was coming in as the moisture was ending anyway, not sure how that currently is playing out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cedric,

How has this model performed for you guys? Looks good!

Thanks!

Kevin

This ones from Brad Travis, Chief Met over a WAFF (NBC) in Huntsville. We dont run this model here. Most stations with WSI have access to this and run this as there on-air model. Apparently it did well with the Ice event back in December and Snowstorm around Christmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like the 18z NAM is going to be further north. The new england vortex is rocketing out a lot faster on this run. And the trough looks more intact in texas at 24hrs.

You're right. That vortex seriously hauls out of the U.S. About time that it did and this should have good implications on our low if I'm not mistaken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Memphis just went with a Winter Storm Warning

...WINTER STORM WARNING IN EFFECT FROM 3 PM SUNDAY TO 6 AM CSTMONDAY...

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN MEMPHIS HAS ISSUED A WINTER STORM

WARNING FOR HEAVY SNOW...WHICH IS IN EFFECT FROM 3 PM SUNDAY TO 6

AM CST MONDAY. THE WINTER STORM WATCH IS NO LONGER IN EFFECT.

* SNOW ACCUMULATIONS: 5 TO 8 INCHES...WITH LOCALLY HIGHER AMOUNTS

POSSIBLE.

* TIMING: SNOW AND POSSIBLY SOME SLEET WILL BEGIN LATE SUNDAY

AFTERNOON AND CONTINUE THROUGH SUNDAY NIGHT. PRECIPITATION

SHOULD CHANGE TO ALL SNOW SUNDAY EVENING. SNOW MAY BE HEAVY AT

TIMES AND A FEW THUNDERSTORMS ARE ALSO POSSIBLE. ANY

THUNDERSTORMS WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY RAISE HOURLY SNOWFALL RATES.

* IMPACTS: SNOW COVERED ROADS AND DANGEROUS TRAVEL CONDITIONS ARE

EXPECTED BY SUNDAY EVENING. THE DANGEROUS TRAVEL CONDITIONS

WILL LIKELY PERSIST AT LEAST INTO THE MONDAY MORNING RUSH...AND

POSSIBLY THROUGH THE DAY AND BEYOND.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stormsfury,

TD/temp. gradients are going to be very tight in the CHS/SAV area as one might expect when there is wedging and the marine layer involved. To illustrate, here are some 12Z 1/8 NAM TD projections as of 7 PM tomorrow night:

CHS: 9

SAV: 8

SSI: 32

Due to the N/S shape of the coast at SSI, one can already see how little effect the wedging has there with its much higher TD. An obvious key for CHS/SAV, due to the NE-SW shape of the coast , will be whether or not sfc winds are mainly from a 45 degree or lower angle...NE to NNE, which would largely avoid a direct oceanic trajectory (ocean ~50+).

Here are the 12z 1/8 NAM projected wind vectors every three hours from 7 PM Sun through 10 AM Mon.:

CHS: 13, 35, 29, 49, 36, 30

SAV: 47, 47, 60, 62, 57, 38

At the end of that period, CHS TD rises to 30/26 and SAV 34/31. So, one can see some warming impact of the higher wind angle projected for SAV vs. CHS. More dramatically, SSI rises to a whopping 56/55. So, one can see how much more the marine layer comes into play at SSI vs. SAV here.

I can't really find any past winter storm weather maps that are very similar with regard to this storm's wedging element. Here is how 1/7/1988 at 1 PM looked, near the start of the precip., when there was a more classic parent high over NY:

post-882-0-91440300-1294514742.gif

In contrast, here is the projected map for the upcoming system (although low is similar and there is good wedging, there is no parent high near NY):

post-882-0-05347600-1294516609.gif

1/7/1988 ZR storm effects:

1) The 1/7/1988 storm resulted in a mix at CHS, including a pretty decent sized ZR if I'm not mistaken. The high/low were 33/27 with 0.34" liquid.

2) It produced the last sig. ZR at SAV with high/low of 37/29 and 0.40" liquid and ~0.25" of ice. SAV was down to 30 F from 2PM to 10PM with ZR and thousands lost power (although roads were mostly ok).

3) Metter/Statesboro and into inland SC had severe icing with 1"+ of ZR! (So this was the last major ZR in that part of GA/SC).

4) In contrast, Brunswick, GA, had a much warmer 47/33 and no ZR, due to the marine layer.

5)- 850's as of 1 PM 1/7/88, during the early stages of the precip., were as follows:

CHS: +5 C; SAV: +7.5C; SSI: +8.5 C...the 0C line was way up near the SC/NC border.

- In contrast, the 12z NAM forecast for 7 AM Mon., during the early stages of the precip., are as follows:

CHS: -1 C; SAV: +2 C, SSI: +4 C

-So, 850's are projected to be ~5C colder than near the start in 1988.

- On 1/7/88 at 7 PM (six hours later), 850's warmed only slowly to +7/+8/+9 at CHS/SAV/SSI (only a 0.5 to 2 C warming).

- They are projected this time to warm to the following 6 hours later (1 PM Mon): +2/+5/+7.5..so ~ 3C warming. However, even then, when a decent chunk of the precip. has already fallen, 850's are still 2.5 to 3 C colder at CHS/SAV vs. where they were in the early stages of the 1/7/1988 event!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conclusion/final comments for CHS/SAV for this storm:

1) The exact sfc wind vectors will be very crucial. If the NAM is overestimating the angle, the temp.'s will likely be colder than what is being projected. That would mean a risk for more ZR, especially, being that TD's are expected tt be in the single numbers on Sun. and that there is expected to be pretty strong wedging.

2) I have no feel for how the upcoming wedge setup compares to the 1988 setup as far as staying power vs. the marine layer is concerned.

3) 850's will be colder than in 1988. I'm not sure what that would mean here. That may actually mean that the wedge is weaker this time since the rise in temp.'s from the ground to the 850 mb level would be smaller this time assuming the surface temp. progs aren't grossly overdone...i.e., assuming they don't end up plunging to the mid 20's or so. If so, maybe this is indicative of a wedge that won't be able to hold off the marine layer as well as in 1988? OTOH, maybe this means that projected sfc temp.'s are too warm? However, I doubt they'd plunge to the mid 20's.

4) I'm assuming that offshore/coastal SST's are quite a bit colder this time vs.1/1988 because it has been so much colder over the last 1.5 months vs. it being much warmer in 12/87. Perhaps that would, itself, mean a cooler marine layer vs. 1988??

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd love to hear stormsfury's opinion (or anyone else knowledgeable from the area) on all of this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hard to believe that actually transpires though

When something appears on a model that seems to defy logic you look for multiple causes. In this case we have a weakening SW moving south of NC while NC is covered by a very dry air mass. That combination can make it appear as if the precip just vanishes from one panel to the next. Less moist air riding north over a very dry surface and poof, the amazing disappearing precip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...