usedtobe Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 http://voices.washingtonpost.com/capitalweathergang/2011/01/tuesday_snow_risk_increases.html#more enjoy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
donsutherland1 Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 Very nice discussion, Wes. I like the idea of the two tracks you cited and also like the probabilities you provided this far in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sauss06 Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 Thanks Wes. As always it was a good read Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desnowlover Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 Great info and explanations i appreciate it! I am located more East, however your explanations are always easy for me to understand. Ever thought of writing a book titled Weather forecast for Dummies? I would buy 10! Thanks so much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marked8 Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 I would take a 3 incher at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 I think the probabilities/ranges you have are quite realistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usedtobe Posted January 7, 2011 Author Share Posted January 7, 2011 On 1/7/2011 at 7:41 PM, baroclinic_instability said: I think the probabilities/ranges you have are quite realistic. Thanks, I hope so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redmorninglight Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 Great read as always, Wes. You are an asset to this board and as a science educator, I appreciate expert analysis and honesty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eurojosh Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 On 1/7/2011 at 10:29 PM, Redmorninglight said: Great read as always, Wes. You are an asset to this board and as a science educator, I appreciate expert analysis and honesty. Wes - Great read, and good job CWG all season long on setting realistic expectations. But I've got to ask - WTF happened in that comments thread?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 On 1/7/2011 at 6:46 PM, usedtobe said: http://voices.washin...eases.html#more enjoy I am inclined to agree ...overall. However, the heights in the deep S/SE are still acting a general mitigation for wave amplitude east of the MV. Doesn't mean that a narrow swath under frontogenics would not evolve - that can certainly happen. If for some method the atmosphere relaxes that compressed flat ridge in the S though the door opens for substantially more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr No Posted January 7, 2011 Share Posted January 7, 2011 On 1/7/2011 at 11:31 PM, eurojosh said: Wes - Great read, and good job CWG all season long on setting realistic expectations. But I've got to ask - WTF happened in that comments thread?????? lol.. what's wrong with people, it's just frozen water? BTW, nice write-up, Wes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vastateofmind Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 On 1/7/2011 at 11:31 PM, eurojosh said: Wes - Great read, and good job CWG all season long on setting realistic expectations. But I've got to ask - WTF happened in that comments thread?????? Well, "BobMiller2" - quite possibly the most annoying weenie in all weenie-dom and certainly on the CWG blog -- clocked in with HIS two centavos, which is always good for degrading the quality of discussion on any CWG comment thread... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.