ORH_wxman Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I left out 12/19/09....10.0" at BOS...def a KU. But the point remains the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I think it has to do with ariel coverage. Some of those southern storms still killed VA and further south and west...the BOS storms get such a small area they can't get on the scale. I might agree if their NESIS was higher. But two of the 1987 events have NESIS values below 2. Meanwhile, their 10+ coverage is similar to some other storms on the moderate list (compare Jan 25-27 1987 with Feb 2-4 1996... the coverage is almost identical (with isolated higher totals in 1996 and a wider are of 4-10" coverage in the urban corridor, and a higher NESIS). If there's any storm that should be dropped from the KU main list and dumped in either "near miss" or "moderate", its Jan 25-27 1987. It really doesn't belong on the main list. It was just grandfathered in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-X Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Wow, some of the near miss and moderate are ranked higher than the proper list-- more disorganized than I thought. Thanks for the list, Ray. Jan 1987 and Feb 1987 are two lower "outliers" lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Wow, some of the near miss and moderate are ranked higher than the proper list-- more disorganized than I thought. Thanks for the list, Ray. Keep in mind that its the NESIS site and its different than the KU book. Its weird that they are different because KU came up with all of this, but they rank the storms a bit differently. The maps in the KU book are different too. The NESIS site is very conservative for their snow amounts and do not always match the Kocin snow amounts. Frequently they are less. They have a horrific amount of coverage for some of these New England storms while Kocin's maps are much better in the book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Keep in mind that its the NESIS site and its different than the KU book. Its weird that they are different because KU came up with all of this, but they rank the storms a bit differently. The maps in the KU book are different too. The NESIS site is very conservative for their snow amounts and do not always match the Kocin snow amounts. Frequently they are less. They have a horrific amount of coverage for some of these New England storms while Kocin's maps are much better in the book. No, all the NESIS values I listed are taken from KU verbatim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 No, all the NESIS values I listed are taken from KU verbatim. I've seen major differences in the maps....snowfall wise. I think someone posted earlier that the original KU paper had slightly different rankings, but most of them were the same. But the maps are definitely different, make no mistake about it. The NESIS maps are much more conservative. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-X Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 Keep in mind that its the NESIS site and its different than the KU book. Its weird that they are different because KU came up with all of this, but they rank the storms a bit differently. The maps in the KU book are different too. The NESIS site is very conservative for their snow amounts and do not always match the Kocin snow amounts. Frequently they are less. They have a horrific amount of coverage for some of these New England storms while Kocin's maps are much better in the book. Hopefully one of these days Kocin will publish the list on his website with the correct snowfall amounts mapped out (they were conservative on the last storm too.) If I had made that list I would be pissed off that someone else was using it and messed up the numbers (thereby making me look bad) lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I've seen major differences in the maps....snowfall wise. I think someone posted earlier that the original KU paper had slightly different rankings, but most of them were the same. But the maps are definitely different, make no mistake about it. The NESIS maps are much more conservative. That's nice, but what I'm saying is that the list I just made was ripped right out of KU volume 2. Pure copying from paper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 That's nice, but what I'm saying is that the list I just made was ripped right out of KU volume 2. Pure copying from paper. Oh ok, well I wasn't disputing your ranking...I was commenting on the snowfall amounts to ALEX....they are lower on the NESIS maps than the KU book. The rankings generally do not change (except a couple tweaks from the original KU paper)....because the amounts are low on every storm for the NESIS site compared to the KU book.So most storms get bumped up the same amount, so the ranking won't change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 I might agree if their NESIS was higher. But two of the 1987 events have NESIS values below 2. Meanwhile, their 10+ coverage is similar to some other storms on the moderate list (compare Jan 25-27 1987 with Feb 2-4 1996... the coverage is almost identical (with isolated higher totals in 1996 and a wider are of 4-10" coverage in the urban corridor, and a higher NESIS). If there's any storm that should be dropped from the KU main list and dumped in either "near miss" or "moderate", its Jan 25-27 1987. It really doesn't belong on the main list. It was just grandfathered in. <New Jersey punk-ass voice> "Yeah, yeah, that's right, I had "the bible" right here in front of me when I was writing this, comparing them directly. Wanna make something of it???"</New Jersey punk-ass voice> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A-L-E-X Posted January 8, 2011 Share Posted January 8, 2011 <New Jersey punk-ass voice> "Yeah, yeah, that's right, I had "the bible" right here in front of me when I was writing this, comparing them directly. Wanna make something of it???"</New Jersey punk-ass voice> lol ok Mister Situation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Added in individual city airport snowfall totals: The KU list "proper": 18-20 March 1956 NESIS - 2.23 BOS: 13.2" LGA: 9.3" NYC: 11.6" JFK: N/A PHL: 8.7" BWI: 5.5" DCA: 1.7" IAD: N/A 14-17 February 1958 NESIS - 5.98 BOS: 19.4" LGA: 10.1" NYC: 7.9" JFK: N/A PHL: 13.0" BWI: 15.5" DCA: 14.4" IAD: N/A 18-21 March 1958 NESIS - 3.92 BOS: 6.7" LGA: 10.5" NYC: 11.8" JFK: N/A PHL: 11.4" BWI: 8.4" DCA: 4.8" IAD: N/A 2-5 March 1960 NESIS - 7.63 BOS: 19.8" LGA: 15.5" NYC: 14.6" JFK: 14.3" PHL: 8.4" BWI: 10.5" DCA: 7.9" IAD: N/A 10-13 December 1960 NESIS - 4.47 BOS: 13.0" LGA: 11.0" NYC: 15.2" JFK: 12.2" PHL: 14.6" BWI: 14.1" DCA: 8.5" IAD: N/A 19-20 January 1961 NESIS - 3.47 BOS: 12.3" LGA: 8.6" NYC: 9.9" JFK: 8.0" PHL: 13.2" BWI: 8.4" DCA: 7.7" IAD: N/A 2-5 February 1961 NESIS - 6.24 BOS: 14.4" LGA: 19.0" NYC: 17.4" JFK: 24.1" PHL: 10.3" BWI: 10.7" DCA: 8.3" IAD: N/A 11-14 January 1964 NESIS - 5.74 BOS: 9.2" LGA: 9.9" NYC: 12.5" JFK: 13.6" PHL: 7.2" BWI: 9.9" DCA: 8.5" IAD: 10.2" 29-31 January 1966 NESIS - 5.05 BOS: 6.3" LGA: 5.5" NYC: 6.8" JFK: 6.0" PHL: 8.3" BWI: 12.1" DCA: 13.8" IAD: 9.8" 23-25 December 1966 NESIS - 3.79 BOS: 5.7" LGA: 5.6" NYC: 7.1" JFK: 6.7" PHL: 12.7" BWI: 8.5" DCA: 7.0" IAD: 9.2" 5-7 February 1967 NESIS - 3.82 BOS: 9.5" LGA: 12.9" NYC: 15.2" JFK: 10.9" PHL: 9.9" BWI: 10.6" DCA: 10.3" IAD: 11.8" 8-10 February 1969 NESIS - 3.34 BOS: 11.1" LGA: 16.1" NYC: 15.3" JFK: 20.2" PHL: 2.9" BWI: 3.3" DCA: 1.0" IAD: 5.0" 22-28 February 1969 NESIS - 4.01 BOS: 26.3" LGA: 2.0" NYC: 1.3" JFK: 1.6" PHL: 1.9" BWI: 0.3" DCA: T IAD: 1.5" 25-28 December 1969 NESIS - 5.19 BOS: 4.2" LGA: 7.4" NYC: 6.8" JFK: 6.1" PHL: 5.1" BWI: 6.1" DCA: 5.1" IAD: 12.1" 18-20 February 1972 NESIS - 4.19 BOS: 6.3" LGA: 6.3" NYC: 5.7" JFK: 3.4" PHL: 3.7" BWI: 3.2" DCA: 5.5" IAD: 10.0" 19-21 January 1978 NESIS - 5.90 BOS: 21.4" LGA: 11.0" NYC: 13.6" JFK: 14.2" PHL: 13.2" BWI: 5.6" DCA: 4.1" IAD: 7.5" 5-7 February 1978 NESIS - 6.25 BOS: 27.1" LGA: 14.4" NYC: 17.7" JFK: 13.7" PHL: 14.1" BWI: 9.1" DCA: 2.2" IAD: 1.2" 18-20 February 1979 NESIS - 4.42 BOS: 0.0" LGA: 9.0" NYC: 12.7" JFK: 10.2" PHL: 14.3" BWI: 20.0" DCA: 18.7" IAD: 16.3" 5-7 April 1982 NESIS - 3.75 BOS: 13.3" LGA: 8.2" NYC: 9.6" JFK: 8.0" PHL: 3.5" BWI: T DCA: T IAD: T 10-12 February 1983 NESIS - 6.28 BOS: 13.5" LGA: 22.0" NYC: 17.6" JFK: 21.7" PHL: 21.3" BWI: 22.8" DCA: 16.6" IAD: 22.8" 21-23 January 1987 NESIS - 4.93 BOS: 5.3" LGA: 11.3" NYC: 8.1" JFK: 7.7" PHL: 8.8" BWI: 12.3" DCA: 10.8" IAD: 11.1" 25-27 January 1987 NESIS - 1.70 BOS: 3.3" LGA: 2.8" NYC: 3.5" JFK: 3.4" PHL: 4.1" BWI: 9.6" DCA: 9.2" IAD: 10.2" 22-24 February 1987 NESIS - 1.46 BOS: T LGA: 3.5" NYC: 4.2" JFK: 6.1" PHL: 6.8" BWI: 10.1" DCA: 10.3" IAD: 12.0" 12-14 March 1993 NESIS - 12.52 BOS: 12.8" LGA: 12.3" NYC: 10.6" JFK: 9.3" PHL: 12.0" BWI: 11.9" DCA: 6.6" IAD: 14.1" 8-11 February 1994 NESIS - 4.81 BOS: 26.7" LGA: 20.1" NYC: 21.8" JFK: 19.7" PHL: 10.3" BWI: 4.6" DCA: 3.1" IAD: 3.5" 3-5 February 1995 NESIS - 3.51 BOS: 6.6" LGA: 10.4" NYC: 10.8" JFK: 7.0" PHL: 8.8" BWI: 7.2" DCA: 4.5" IAD: 6.2" 6-8 January 1996 NESIS - 11.54 BOS: 18.2" LGA: 23.8" NYC: 20.2" JFK: 20.7" PHL: 30.7" BWI: 22.5" DCA: 17.1" IAD: 24.6" 31 March-1 April 1997 NESIS 2.37 BOS: 25.4" LGA: 0.4" NYC: T JFK: 1.7" PHL: 3.9" BWI: 1.4" DCA: T IAD: T 24-26 January 2000 NESIS - 3.14 BOS: 3.5" LGA: 5.9" NYC: 5.5" JFK: 6.4" PHL: 8.5" BWI: 14.9" DCA: 9.3" IAD: 10.3" 30-31 December 2000 NESIS - 2.48 BOS: 0.5" LGA: 13.7" NYC: 12.0" JFK: 10.5" PHL: 9.0" BWI: 0.0" DCA: 0.0" IAD: 0.0" 15-18 February 2003 NESIS - 8.91 BOS: 27.6" LGA: 17.6" NYC: 19.8" JFK: 26.0" PHL: 20.8" BWI: 28.2" DCA: 16.7" IAD: 22.4" 5-7 December 2003 NESIS - 4.63 BOS: 16.9" LGA: 13.2" NYC: 14.0" JFK: 12.7" PHL: 4.8" BWI: 6.8" DCA: 1.7" IAD: 6.8" Here's the "near miss" list: 17-18 February 1952 NESIS - 2.17 BOS: 10.3" LGA: 1.5" NYC: 2.1" JFK: N/A PHL: 0.0" BWI: 0.0" DCA: 0.0" IAD: N/A 16-17 March 1956 NESIS - 2.93 BOS: 6.7" LGA: 7.4" NYC: 6.7" JFK: N/A PHL: 1.3" BWI: 0.5" DCA: 0.3" IAD: N/A 12-13 March 1959 NESIS - 3.64 BOS: 6.4" LGA: 7.4" NYC: 5.5" JFK: 5.0" PHL: 1.2" BWI: T DCA: T IAD: N/A 13-15 February 1960 NESIS - 4.17 BOS: 0.6" LGA: 2.7" NYC: 1.0" JFK: 1.6" PHL: 1.4" BWI: 8.2" DCA: 6.2" IAD: N/A 6-7 March 1962 NESIS - 2.76 BOS: 0.4" LGA: 0.7" NYC: 0.2" JFK: 0.8" PHL: 6.8" BWI: 10.0" DCA: 3.3" IAD: N/A 18-19 February 1964 NESIS - 2.39 BOS: 9.1" LGA: 3.7" NYC: 6.4" JFK: 3.3" PHL: 2.2" BWI: 7.0" DCA: 0.4" IAD: 4.9" 22-24 January 1966 NESIS - 4.45 BOS: 8.5" LGA: 1.7" NYC: 2.4" JFK: 1.8" PHL: 3.5" BWI: 2.1" DCA: T IAD: 3.2" 3-5 March 1971 NESIS - 3.73 BOS: 2.2" LGA: 2.3" NYC: 1.3" JFK: 2.8" PHL: 4.3" BWI: 2.0" DCA: 1.1" IAD: 1.6" 25-27 November 1971 NESIS - 2.33 BOS: T LGA: T NYC: T JFK: T PHL: T BWI: 0.3" DCA: 1.0" IAD: T 16-18 January 1978 NESIS - 4.10 BOS: 2.9" LGA: 2.2" NYC: 1.7" JFK: 1.9" PHL: 4.4" BWI: 2.4" DCA: 1.0" IAD: 1.3" 28-29 March 1984 NESIS - 1.86 BOS: 9.1" LGA: 2.5" NYC: 3.3" JFK: 2.5" PHL: 0.6" BWI: T DCA: T IAD: 4.2" 1-2 January 1987 NESIS - 2.26 BOS: 3.1" LGA: 0.8" NYC: 0.5" JFK: 0.2" PHL: 0.7" BWI: 0.3" DCA: T IAD: 5.1" 11-12 December 1992 NESIS - 3.10 BOS: 9.2" LGA: 0.5" NYC: 0.4" JFK: 0.8" PHL: 0.0" BWI: 0.0" DCA: T IAD: 0.2" 3-4 January 1994 NESIS - 2.87 BOS: 8.9" LGA: 1.1" NYC: 1.0" JFK: 0.8" PHL: 0.6" BWI: 0.4" DCA: 0.5" IAD: 1.4" 2-4 March 1994 NESIS - 3.46 BOS: 8.0" LGA: 5.5" NYC: 5.0" JFK: 3.7" PHL: 3.8" BWI: 3.1" DCA: 2.1" IAD: 5.3" Here's the "moderate" list: 4-5 December 1957 NESIS - 1.32 BOS: T LGA: 7.5" NYC: 7.5" JFK: N/A PHL: 5.5" BWI: 7.8" DCA: 11.1" IAD: N/A 23-25 December 1961 NESIS - 1.37 BOS: 10.0" LGA: 3.0" NYC: 6.2" JFK: 4.5" PHL: 3.2" BWI: 5.9" DCA: 0.5" IAD: N/A 14-15 February 1962 NESIS - 1.59 BOS: 7.6" LGA: 2.4" NYC: 2.7" JFK: 2.1" PHL: 4.4" BWI: 2.1" DCA: 0.5" IAD: N/A 22-24 December 1963 NESIS - 3.17 BOS: 5.4" LGA: 7.5" NYC: 6.6" JFK: 3.7" PHL: 5.2" BWI: 8.0" DCA: 5.6" IAD: 7.5" 16-17 January 1965 NESIS - 1.95 BOS: 7.3" LGA: 4.6" NYC: 4.6" JFK: 6.1" PHL: 3.7" BWI: 2.7" DCA: 2.5" IAD: 2.3" 21-22 March 1967 NESIS - 1.20 BOS: 1.7" LGA: 9.0" NYC: 9.8" JFK: 8.6" PHL: 4.2" BWI: 2.0" DCA: 0.7" IAD: 0.7" 31 December 1970-1 January 1971 NESIS - 2.10 BOS: 4.9" LGA: 5.7" NYC: 6.4" JFK: 6.0" PHL: 5.5" BWI: 6.0" DCA: 9.3" IAD: 15.4" 13-15 January 1982 NESIS - 3.08 BOS: 12.7" LGA: 9.9" NYC: 9.3" JFK: 9.5" PHL: 9.2" BWI: 7.6" DCA: 7.1" IAD: 5.7" 8-9 March 1984 NESIS - 1.29 BOS: 2.1" LGA: 8.7" NYC: 6.9" JFK: 6.9" PHL: 7.3" BWI: 4.8" DCA: 1.5" IAD: 4.7" 7-8 January 1988 NESIS - 4.85 BOS: 9.0" LGA: 6.9" NYC: 5.2" JFK: 9.6" PHL: 3.9" BWI: 8.4" DCA: 8.0" IAD: 5.5" 27-28 December 1990 NESIS - 1.56 BOS: 1.2" LGA: 7.3" NYC: 7.2" JFK: 6.1" PHL: 6.4" BWI: 4.8" DCA: 3.0" IAD: 4.7" 19-21 December 1995 NESIS - 3.32 BOS: 12.0" LGA: 14.9" NYC: 7.8" JFK: 8.2" PHL: 2.3" BWI: 1.2" DCA: 0.2" IAD: 0.6" 2-4 February 1996 NESIS - 2.03 BOS: 5.0" LGA: 8.1" NYC: 7.5" JFK: 8.0" PHL: 5.1" BWI: 8.0" DCA: 8.4" IAD: 8.2" 16-17 February 1996 NESIS - 1.65 BOS: 7.1" LGA: 8.6" NYC: 10.7" JFK: 8.3" PHL: 7.5" BWI: 9.8" DCA: 6.8" IAD: 7.5" 14-15 March 1999 NESIS - 2.20 BOS: 4.2" LGA: 4.6" NYC: 4.5" JFK: 4.4" PHL: 4.8" BWI: 2.7" DCA: 0.3" IAD: 5.4" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthlight Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 GFS at 180 hours says we are probably headed towards a second one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nzucker Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 GFS at 180 hours says we are probably headed towards a second one I think we could evolve an interesting gradient pattern starting next weekend, with an arctic front moving through and a potential wave forming on that front. The CPC shows the PNA going positive in that time frame which may support a larger system, especially given the cold air in place with the PV over central Canada: I also think the arctic front may trend a little stronger with 850s approaching -20C, or at least -15C. That's a monster PV to our northwest with a core of 850s <-35C, so I'm thinking we're going to get some very cold temperatures. Given the snowpack over the region, we could see some really bitter nights if we manage to clear out following the arctic front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormlover74 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I wonder why they combined the Feb 8th and 11th event into one. I mean there was at least a 24 to 36 hour break between events to qualify as separate to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I wonder why they combined the Feb 8th and 11th event into one. I mean there was at least a 24 to 36 hour break between events to qualify as separate to me. In NJ, yes... further south it was shorter... since KU covers all the way down to NoVa, I guess they decided to put them together (otherwise it'd probably just be two "moderate" events) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
famartin Posted January 12, 2011 Share Posted January 12, 2011 I may eat my words... but I'm not enthused about a BIG storm next week. I think its a fringe. Several inches, sure... KU? I really doubt it. But again, I may eat my words... Well I guess I'm partly eating my words. It wasn't KU in Philly, Jersey or NYC... but certainly up in SNE, it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamarack Posted January 12, 2011 Share Posted January 12, 2011 I wonder why they combined the Feb 8th and 11th event into one. I mean there was at least a 24 to 36 hour break between events to qualify as separate to me. The Feb 5-7,1967 totals, for NYC anyway, are two separate events, too. The first was a several-hour heavy burst of about 3-4" (in NNJ) the morning of 6th, with the sun out that aft and stars in the evening. Act II began about 4 AM on 2/7 and continued much of the day. Coldest +SNof my NJ experience; the heaviest fell at mid singles, and wouldn't pack at all under the tires o my Dad's big Pontiac. Don't have my NYC numbers handy, but I know 2/7 was 12.5" there so 2/6 must be 2.7". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.