Harry Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 He was still an out of control drunk weenie tonight Probably what did him in. Note that the board is in storm mode status as well. Thus my guess he was probably given a 24hr timeout and or enough to sober up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 No, he wasn't. Whoever banned him for it should unban him and offer a sincere apology. I'd unban him if he was actually banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeatherPimp Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 For Ohio it's almost looking like I-71 is going to be the dividing line with the better chance for 4+ inches to the north and west and a bit less south and east. Pretty reasonable call in my opinion, I'd say 2-3 inches South and East of 71 with 3-5 (isolated 6 inch amounts) North and West. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 No, he wasn't. Whoever banned him for it should unban him and offer a sincere apology. Well, he's still got his member tag, so if anything happened I think he was temporarily suspended rather than banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayPSU Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 He was still an out of control drunk weenie tonight He was never at any point uncivil to anyone which is more than I can say for some other posters here in this region earlier this winter. At no point were any of them banned. It was completely uncalled for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayPSU Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I'd unban him if he was actually banned. Someone has him restricted to 5 posts a day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoMo Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Someone has him restricted to 5 posts a day. was he posting in a different thread, like the model thread on the main page or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baroclinic_instability Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 One minor thing to note for everyone here. When assessing a DGZ, one must not simply assess if the sounding is saturated through the optimal thermal regime, but one must assess vertical ascent through that layer as well as moisture levels to fully come to a conclusion. Crystal growth is a pretty challenging thing to truly forecast and is quite fickle. Even dendrite growth alone can happen but be sub-optimal depending on a number of factors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayPSU Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 was he posting in a different thread, like the model thread on the main page or something? I can't say for sure. The fact that he believes he was banned for the GGEM site error leads me to believe he was only posting in this area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 HR 12: LT precip in N. KS, and all of NE. LT-MOD precip in C. NE. HR 18: LT precip in very N. KS and LT-MOD precip in N. Neb. and SW Neb. LT precip in all of NE besides those areas. HR 24: LT precip in N. KS. LT-MOD precip in W and C Neb. LT precip in rest of Neb. HR 30: LT precip in C/N/W KS. LT precip in C/N/W Neb. LT-Mod precip in E Neb. HR 36: LT precip in S. KS. LT-MOD precip rest of KS. LT-Mod precip in SE Neb and W. IA. HR 42: LT precip in KS/NEB. LT-MOD precip in W. IA. Spot of LT-MOD precip in NE KS, NE Neb. HR 48: LT precip in NE/KS/MO/MN/W. WI. LT-Mod precip in W/C IA. LT precip in rest of IA as well. HR 54: LT-MOD precip in W/C Neb. LT precip in E. KS/E. NEB/MN/IA/WI/IL/S.IND HR 60: LT precip in MN/IA/WI/IL/IN/OH. LT-MOD precip in E/NE MO/ and W. IL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 By 54, the ULL over the Rockies is deeper than the 12z Euro, but the ridging out in front is weaker. Cyclogenesis is occurring farther east near STL. for the euro from am19psu in 00z model thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayPSU Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 I can't say for sure. The fact that he believes he was banned for the GGEM site error leads me to believe he was only posting in this area. He only posted here, and in the off-topic "Winter Complaint" thread. Considering one of our own regional posters went there earlier this winter and made an attack thread against Ohio posters without getting banned, I don't think it was for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 The ECMWF ends up a bit weaker SLP and QPF wise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheWeatherPimp Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 He only posted here, and in the off-topic "Winter Complaint" thread. Considering one of our own regional posters went there earlier this winter and made an attack thread against Ohio posters without getting banned, I don't think it was for that. He was posting weenie comments about how every model was showing less and less precip for his back yard, and how this storm was going to be a fail, and this and that. Quite frankly there was very little change in the new 00z run. He claims that Ohio posters get constantly attacked, well quite frankly I have never had any problems. It is all about how you present yourself, but when you post and provide nothing insightful, what does he expect? The only thing you are doing is cluttering this post with this junk, so if it needs to be discussed further take it to OT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoMo Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 HR 12: LT precip in N. KS, and all of NE. LT-MOD precip in C. NE. HR 18: LT precip in very N. KS and LT-MOD precip in N. Neb. and SW Neb. LT precip in all of NE besides those areas. HR 24: LT precip in N. KS. LT-MOD precip in W and C Neb. LT precip in rest of Neb. HR 30: LT precip in C/N/W KS. LT precip in C/N/W Neb. LT-Mod precip in E Neb. HR 36: LT precip in S. KS. LT-MOD precip rest of KS. LT-Mod precip in SE Neb and W. IA. HR 42: LT precip in KS/NEB. LT-MOD precip in W. IA. Spot of LT-MOD precip in NE KS, NE Neb. HR 48: LT precip in NE/KS/MO/MN/W. WI. LT-Mod precip in W/C IA. LT precip in rest of IA as well. HR 54: LT-MOD precip in W/C Neb. LT precip in E. KS/E. NEB/MN/IA/WI/IL/S.IND HR 60: LT precip in MN/IA/WI/IL/IN/OH. LT-MOD precip in E/NE MO/ and W. IL yikes, that does not sound good for here. Thanks for posting this Moneyman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 The ECMWF ends up a bit weaker SLP and QPF wise. again probably down to .45 to .50 for lincoln/omaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moneyman Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 HR 66: LT precip in E. MN/IA/WI/IL/E.MO/MI/IN//OH. LT-MOD precip in E. IND HR 72: LT precip in IA/E.MN/WI/IL/MI/IND LT-MOD precip in E. IND,/OH/ and E. PA HR 78: LT precip in MI/IND/OH. LT-MOD precip in NE OH (extreme NE OH) and PA HR 84: LT precip in OH. Storm is mostly over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 yikes, that does not sound good for here. Thanks for posting this Moneyman. You're riding the edge of 0.25" QPF. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoMo Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 You're riding the edge of 0.25" QPF. I think it was 0.21 last night so that sounds about right. As long as the NAM doesn't pan out, I'm good with 2". Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Not sure what to make of the Euro going weaker, even the GFS trended slightly stronger. So the Euro really is on its own on this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayPSU Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 He was posting weenie comments about how every model was showing less and less precip for his back yard, and how this storm was going to be a fail, and this and that. Quite frankly there was very little change in the new 00z run. He claims that Ohio posters get constantly attacked, well quite frankly I have never had any problems. It is all about how you present yourself, but when you post and provide nothing insightful, what does he expect? The only thing you are doing is cluttering this post with this junk, so if it needs to be discussed further take it to OT. Um, well, his particular area did see a decrease in qpf with the 0Z run. Nothing wrong with pointing that out. As for this storm being a fail, the trend this winter is that every storm in our area has ended up drying up and underperforming. I understand the skepticism. So pointing out a decrease in 0Z run qpf and pointing out a seasonal trend in our area is grounds for punishment? Um, ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 yikes, that does not sound good for here. Thanks for posting this Moneyman. 0.25" for JLN. again probably down to .45 to .50 for lincoln/omaha 0.51" for LNK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukrocks Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 What was the precip total at SDF? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowlover2 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Sounds like around 0.25 here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Not sure what to make of the Euro going weaker, even the GFS trended slightly stronger. So the Euro really is on its own on this one. I'm not really sure there is that big of a difference comparing the 0z run to the 12z run. Matter of fact, it looks better (farther east with the 0.25" line) for people in IA, MN, and STL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jcwxguy Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 0.25" for JLN. 0.51" for LNK. Thanks so much. that would still yeild between 6.5 to 7.5 inches of snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kab2791 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 00Z Euro DET: 0.16 TOL: 0.19 CMH: 0.31 DAY: 0.27 IND: 0.27 SDF: 0.22 ORD: 0.13 DBQ: 0.19 STL: 0.27 PIT: 0.39 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 What was the precip total at SDF? 0.23" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paweatherguy1 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 Dilly was just frustrated...I think most of us in wpa and oh have been..seen a whole bunch of 4-6 storms in the mid range get closer to the short range and we end up hoping for 1-3...every system this year has fizzled by the time it got to this area. As far as him getting 5 posted, I understand...however, there is a major disparity on here with WHO gets post limits. I see phineas on The model thread, which aren't supposed to be cluttered, every night basically saying. "this sucks" over and over, and ji weenieing out every 5 minutes and somehow their posts aren't deleted and they aren't 5 posted. My advice to the mods would be to treat everyone the same, even if they are people like phineas who has been around a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sc2man13 Posted January 9, 2011 Share Posted January 9, 2011 00Z Euro DET: 0.16 TOL: 0.19 CMH: 0.31 DAY: 0.27 IND: 0.27 SDF: 0.22 ORD: 0.13 DBQ: 0.19 STL: 0.27 PIT: 0.39 What does it have in store for GRR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.