Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

January 10th-12th OV/MW/GL Winter Storm prospects


Madmaxweather

Recommended Posts

I always believe in things even out, karma, etc. They got dumped on last year. Just like how MSP is behind detroit about 60 inches the past 8 years and they are closely erasing that so far this year.

After last season, they have no room to b***h.

BTW, I'm taking these latest trends with a grain of salt. I would certainly be pleasantly suprised with a Chicago-Detroit-Toronto snowfall, we haven't had one all season, but there's still plenty of room for change (for better or worse).

Yeah don't get me wrong I am glad my forecast tanked for my own BY and we will get 3-5" fluff.

I will say MPX has not done all that superb this winter besides one storm. Take out the anomalous northern plains blizzard and we are right at average climo wise. Almost everyone on the boards (not you) is hounding MPX and saying they want storms to go wide/around MPX or would get pissed if another storm went through. In reality, we are back to normal--it goes to show how anomalous it has been the last 8-10 years that folks expect MPX/southern MN to do poorly and when we are at or slightly above average they believe we are being blessed by the weather gods.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I lived that for 30yrs in that area/region before moving out this way. In 1997-98 winter never did arrive and not a flake was seen by me that winter. Ofcourse that is the extreme and the only time i seen that happen but still. Still not over with but yeah trends are not on their side at this point.

Incredible. Not one flake of snow for an entire winter. I couldn't imagine such a horror.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

cmh west.. what have we become that a 3" snowfall is a snow storm? Ohio guys (myself included) are so desparate for snow that a 3" snow is considered a storm.. I am sticking with my 1-3" call.

If anything, CMH gets donut holed and your area gets more than us. Either way, you need to lighten up a bit, my friend :)

gfs_p60_108s.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anything, CMH gets donut holed and your area gets more than us. Either way, you need to lighten up a bit, my friend :)

Nah I am annoyed. To be quite frank I am fed up with tracking storms this year that show good snows for us for them to change every time within 2 or 3 days. Waste 6 days tracking a 2-3" snowstorm. Its freaking frustrating. Makes me wanna punch puppies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah don't get me wrong I am glad my forecast tanked for my own BY and we will get 3-5" fluff.

I will say MPX has not done all that superb this winter besides one storm. Take out the anomalous northern plains blizzard and we are right at average climo wise. Everyone on the baords (not you) is hounding MPX and saying they want storms to go wide/around MPX or would get pissed if another storm went through. In reality, we are back to normal--it goes to show how anomalous it has been the last 8-10 years that folks expect MPX/southern MN to do poorly and when we are at or slightly above average they believe we are being blessed by the weather gods.

I agree. Besides that one storm (only storm we've had here in Se MI) there really havent been any monsters in the upper midwest. Ratios have been so high that the snow amounts have been high but the storms relatively weren't that impressive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah don't get me wrong I am glad my forecast tanked for my own BY and we will get 3-5" fluff.

I will say MPX has not done all that superb this winter besides one storm. Take out the anomalous northern plains blizzard and we are right at average climo wise. Everyone on the baords (not you) is hounding MPX and saying they want storms to go wide/around MPX or would get pissed if another storm went through. In reality, we are back to normal--it goes to show how anomalous it has been the last 8-10 years that folks expect MPX/southern MN to do poorly and when we are at or slightly above average they believe we are being blessed by the weather gods.

MSP was long overdue for a good season. Doesn't matter how you get there though. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah don't get me wrong I am glad my forecast tanked for my own BY and we will get 3-5" fluff.

I will say MPX has not done all that superb this winter besides one storm. Take out the anomalous northern plains blizzard and we are right at average climo wise. Almost everyone on the boards (not you) is hounding MPX and saying they want storms to go wide/around MPX or would get pissed if another storm went through. In reality, we are back to normal--it goes to show how anomalous it has been the last 8-10 years that folks expect MPX/southern MN to do poorly and when we are at or slightly above average they believe we are being blessed by the weather gods.

You guys definitely were long overdue for a decent season.

However, it's funny how these things workout. Detroit has had several decent seasons in the past few years, yet we're long overdue for a 12"+ bomb (although Minneapolis/MPX had one this season).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my biggest frustrations on here is that people get hung up on a single model run. 72 hours out, the models won't have the QPF right and it will change another 5-10 times before the event gets underway. The more important things to look at are the track of the storm, vertical moisture transport, the Dendritic growth zone, snow ratios, etc. It is futile to get yourself worked up over a model's QPF 72 hours out, especially when it only changes .1 - .2 tenths of an inch! QPF should be used as general guidance but not when deciding whether to keep the bus on the road or drive it off the cliff, at least IMO.

This was never going to be a blockbuster storm, so the fact that we could be looking at a widespread 3-6 inch snow event is pretty impressive IMO, especially considering what has happened so far this season across much of the Ohio Valley (Not counting the snow gods living in LAF).

Anyways, this thing looks good, Good moisture transport, good lift, nice snow ratios, this will be a widespread advisory/border line warning snow event for a large portion of the Ohio Valley. Just let it ride rather than hanging on to every model run.

Rant over. Oh by the way, the Colts shouldn't run the ball, they suck at running!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys definitely were long overdue for a decent season.

However, it's funny how these things workout. Detroit has had several decent seasons in the past few years, yet we're long overdue for a 12"+ bomb (although Minneapolis has one this season).

Yeah I am hoping for a good region wide storm. In reality we still have a good 3-4 months for that to happen. We still have a long way to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys definitely were long overdue for a decent season.

However, it's funny how these things workout. Detroit has had several decent seasons in the past few years, yet we're long overdue for a 12"+ bomb (although Minneapolis has one this season).

Sorry for being OT, but detroit hasnt had a bomb but you travel 40 miles north where I am in Macomb and we have had several 10 inch plus events in the past several years. Crazy how sharp the cutoff has been. It's harder here because usually the ratios aren't very high so we need a lot of precip to get over a foot. Minneapolis can get a foot with far less precip due to ratios. As far as the mid-atlantic and east coast go, we all know why they get 20 inch plus storms. As far as this storm goes if we can overcome virga quickly, and we get .3-.4 of precip 6 inches looks attainable. Long way to go though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my biggest frustrations on here is that people get hung up on a single model run. 72 hours out, the models won't have the QPF right and it will change another 5-10 times before the event gets underway. The more important things to look at are the track of the storm, vertical moisture transport, the Dendritic growth zone, snow ratios, etc. It is futile to get yourself worked up over a model's QPF 72 hours out, especially when it only changes .1 - .2 tenths of an inch! QPF should be used as general guidance but not when deciding whether to keep the bus on the road or drive it off the cliff, at least IMO.

This was never going to be a blockbuster storm, so the fact that we could be looking at a widespread 3-6 inch snow event is pretty impressive IMO, especially considering what has happened so far this season across much of the Ohio Valley (Not counting the snow gods living in LAF).

Anyways, this thing looks good, Good moisture transport, good lift, nice snow ratios, this will be a widespread advisory/border line warning snow event for a large portion of the Ohio Valley. Just let it ride rather than hanging on to every model run.

Rant over. Oh by the way, the Colts shouldn't run the ball, they suck at running!

+1

+100 to the snow gods living in LAF comment. :lmao:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incredible. Not one flake of snow for an entire winter. I couldn't imagine such a horror.

I spent half of it in VA Beach but yeah not a flake. Oddly enough i was not as bothered by it as one might expect. Ofcourse there was a ton of other action ( forgotten stuff such a epic coastal flooding etc where i lived ) to occupy my time with. I think part of it too is that there was no teases and it was warm enough to enjoy being out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of my biggest frustrations on here is that people get hung up on a single model run. 72 hours out, the models won't have the QPF right and it will change another 5-10 times before the event gets underway. The more important things to look at are the track of the storm, vertical moisture transport, the Dendritic growth zone, snow ratios, etc. It is futile to get yourself worked up over a model's QPF 72 hours out, especially when it only changes .1 - .2 tenths of an inch! QPF should be used as general guidance but not when deciding whether to keep the bus on the road or drive it off the cliff, at least IMO.

This was never going to be a blockbuster storm, so the fact that we could be looking at a widespread 3-6 inch snow event is pretty impressive IMO, especially considering what has happened so far this season across much of the Ohio Valley (Not counting the snow gods living in LAF).

Anyways, this thing looks good, Good moisture transport, good lift, nice snow ratios, this will be a widespread advisory/border line warning snow event for a large portion of the Ohio Valley. Just let it ride rather than hanging on to every model run.

Rant over. Oh by the way, the Colts shouldn't run the ball, they suck at running!

I know youre referring to me. But I can clearly see that pertaining to CMH-east things are going the wrong way. I've been tracking storm for 9 years and if there is one thing I have learned it's that once a trend starts it continues. You arent going to tell me that this isnt northwest of 18z. I can post the comparisons and show you but you can go look. Not to mention I already said Im drunk and annoyed lol. not teo mention it is easy for you to say that. Youre biggest snowfall of the season is a bit larger than 1.5" which is what mine is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know youre referring to me. But I can clearly see that pertaining to CMH-east things are going the wrong way. I've been tracking storm for 9 years and if there is one thing I have learned it's that once a trend starts it continues. You arent going to tell me that this isnt northwest of 18z. I can post the comparisons and show you but you can go look. Not to mention I already said Im drunk and annoyed lol. not teo mention it is easy for you to say that. Youre biggest snowfall of the season is a bit larger than 1.5" which is what mine is.

its ok

the ukie isnt amped up

the nogaps aint either

still things to be decided yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...