Damage In Tolland Posted January 4, 2011 Author Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:32 PM, Typhoon Tip said: How long have you two been dating? As long as you've been living in your parents basement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:28 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: NAM looks awesome....any snow is good snow. Lets test this.... 4 inches over 30 hours is that good? 3 inches over 36 hours? is that good? 2 inches over 48 hours? Have you reached your breaking point yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:32 PM, CCPSUSuperstorm2010 said: I would venture to say that the NAM is stronger with the intial impulse and also stronger with the SPV/PV over OH rather than the 6z GFS at hour 90 with the SPV/PV over Lake Erie. The stronger lead impulse leads to a stronger and further southward placed SPV. Exactly - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:32 PM, Typhoon Tip said: How long have you two been dating? Your 12th suicide really brought us closer together and we never looked back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:28 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: NAM looks awesome....any snow is good snow. Ray? Is this you?, Just want to make sure you did not sustain a concussion....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OSUmetstud Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:28 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: NAM looks awesome....any snow is good snow. wait i'm confused...is this sarcasm? You don't think the NAM looks good? The main storm would occur after 84 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:33 PM, CT Blizz said: As long as you've been living in your parents basement Nice try but I own my own house there twinkle toes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:34 PM, OSUmetstud said: wait i'm confused...is this sarcasm? You don't think the NAM looks good? The main storm would occur after 84 hours. I agree - that 90+ hour panel if existed would feature a mad bomb detonating in a very good position. I never can tell with Ray - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:29 PM, CCPSUSuperstorm2010 said: Amen to that. I am leaving for San Antonio, TX on Tuesday, however I go to BOS on Monday. A nice going away present from Mother Nature I hope. CCPS Giving all your good energy and analysis and the fact that you are in The Air Force I believe? I say that we name this storm the CCPSU honorary going away blizzard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:34 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: Your 12th suicide really brought us closer together and we never looked back. Gross - the thought of you two... ewwww. shutters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 I think the Feb 1978 idea and Feb 1969 ideas are losing steam, but not yet off the table.....regardless, I'll spare you all the complaining and see how it plays out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:32 PM, Boston-FranconiaUSA-WX said: i'm not a meteorologist but it reminds me of the new years system from last year. you should be banned for making that comparison.... it was painful!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:35 PM, Typhoon Tip said: I agree - that 90+ hour panel if existed would feature a mad bomb detonating in a very good position. I never can tell with Ray - Cool, can't say I would have been able to discern that, but no time to try .....gotta run. Hopefully the usuals can spare a few texts.....C-ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:33 PM, mahk_webstah said: Lets test this.... 4 inches over 30 hours is that good? 3 inches over 36 hours? is that good? 2 inches over 48 hours? Have you reached your breaking point yet? You are cruel... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:37 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: I think the Feb 1978 idea and Feb 1969 ideas are losing steam, but not yet off the table.....regardless, I'll spare you all the complaining and see how it plays out. Ok well they can leave the table but a bombing low moving due north off of HSE is on the table, being tugged by perfectly positioned H5. I agree to take 78 and 69 off the table if you agree to leave my scenario on the table! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:41 PM, mahk_webstah said: Ok well they can leave the table but a bombing low moving due north off of HSE is on the table, being tugged by perfectly positioned H5. I agree to take 78 and 69 off the table if you agree to leave my scenario on the table! I never complained abouy anything....any light-mod snow is heavily exciting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:28 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: NAM looks awesome....any snow is good snow. Sleep makes a grumpy man happy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 Shout out to Kevin...I won't narrate this GFS run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 "Never complained at all and was, glad I was still able to telepathically skull-fook him." quote Gosh - you are Kev are able to do that? from like 75 miles away? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:44 PM, weathafella said: Shout out to Kevin...I won't narrate this GFS run. f him... narrate away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:44 PM, weathafella said: Shout out to Kevin...I won't narrate this GFS run. After 384 all bets are off.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weathafella Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 Note to blizzardgeek (Jeff aka hooralph)......take the red eye. If anything, like the last system, it will be earlier vs later based on trends since 12Z yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 4, 2011 Author Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:44 PM, weathafella said: Shout out to Kevin...I won't narrate this GFS run. Lol..let the fingers walk all over the keyboard as the panels come out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mahk_webstah Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 out to 36 and i have no idea what i'm lkooking at. 2 lobes of spv i guess, one ne of ME rotating w maybe wsw and another slowing dropping s or se above sake superior Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted January 4, 2011 Author Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:50 PM, mahk_webstah said: out to 36 and i have no idea what i'm lkooking at. 2 lobes of spv i guess, one ne of ME rotating w maybe wsw and another slowing dropping s or se above sake superior Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCPSUSuperstorm2010 Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:33 PM, Typhoon Tip said: Exactly - Ok sounds good. Will monitor the models for this trend. On 1/4/2011 at 3:36 PM, mahk_webstah said: CCPS Giving all your good energy and analysis and the fact that you are in The Air Force I believe? I say that we name this storm the CCPSU honorary going away blizzard. Thanks Mahk. On 1/4/2011 at 3:50 PM, mahk_webstah said: out to 36 and i have no idea what i'm lkooking at. 2 lobes of spv i guess, one ne of ME rotating w maybe wsw and another slowing dropping s or se above sake superior What is sake Superior, J/K. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:37 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: I think the Feb 1978 idea and Feb 1969 ideas are losing steam, but not yet off the table.....regardless, I'll spare you all the complaining and see how it plays out. The Feb 1978 idea was not interpreted correctly by a lot of folks. The mention of it at HPC the other day was - as usual - read differently than what was really written in hard text. The Meteorologist said: WHILE NOT OVERPLAYING ANALOGS... I STILL WANT TO POINT OUT SOMESIMILARITY IN THE PRESENT HPC SCENARIO THIS WEEKEND TO THAT OF FEB6 1978...ESPECIALLY AT 500 MILLIBARS... The way people have been reacting to this statement really has been: "1978 is an analog for this event! 1978 is an analog for this event!" That's completely false when correctly and fairly comprehending what was mentioned by HPC. They were speaking about not overdoing it for one, but most importantly that this particularly pertains to the 500mb evolution with the SPV - to which I concur with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 The NAM is doing what exactly what I referred to last night with the OES thing. That'll get the party started before the main show comes...IF the NAM is right. NAM looks like a powderkeg after hr 84. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tropopause_Fold Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 On 1/4/2011 at 3:54 PM, Typhoon Tip said: The Feb 1978 idea was not interpreted correctly by a lot of folks. The mention of it at HPC the other day was - as usual - read differently than what was really written in hard text. The Meteorologist said: WHILE NOT OVERPLAYING ANALOGS... I STILL WANT TO POINT OUT SOMESIMILARITY IN THE PRESENT HPC SCENARIO THIS WEEKEND TO THAT OF FEB6 1978...ESPECIALLY AT 500 MILLIBARS... The way people have been reacting to this statement really has been: "1978 is an analog for this event! 1978 is an analog for this event!" That's completely false when correctly and fairly comprehending what was mentioned by HPC. They were speaking about not overdoing it for one, but most importantly that this particularly pertains to the 500mb evolution with the SPV - to which I concur with them. Right. Exactly why it was kind of frustrating to see it mentioned. Oh well. Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavisStraight Posted January 4, 2011 Share Posted January 4, 2011 Quote What is sake Superior Thats the top shelf stuff you get at Sakura Tokyo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.