Fozz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Just slightly worse than 0z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdsnowlover Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Midlo that is a wsw criterior in terms of accumulation, if that verified. Too many models giving different answers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share Posted January 10, 2011 looks good for MD and bad for Leesburg. I hate Leesburg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Sim radar looks awesome for NJ/NYC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Midlo that is a wsw criterior in terms of accumulation, if that verified. Too many models giving different answers. Lets say it was .3 QPF total. Unless you are expecting ratios of 20:1, there is no way that's WSW criteria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdsnowlover Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 looks good for MD and bad for Leesburg. I hate Leesburg if that looks bad for leesburg, where the hell is leesburg?? I lived close to it for 5 years and that map sure looks to include leesburg!!!I lived in sugarland run and that is, I believe, 10 miles from leesburg!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
showmethesnow Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 but is it accurrate??? Think this makes more sense then the lows playing footsies all the way up the coast. Of course a lot of the madels keep showing the lack of interaction between those lows, so who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePhotoGuy Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Midlo that is a wsw criterior in terms of accumulation, if that verified. Too many models giving different answers. That is incorrect that would support a general 2+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lsukev Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Midlo that is a wsw criterior in terms of accumulation, if that verified. Too many models giving different answers. I guess we'll see in 24 hours if it verifies... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaltimoreWxGuy Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 if that looks bad for leesburg, where the hell is leesburg?? I lived close to it for 5 years and that map sure looks to include leesburg!!!I lived in sugarland run and that is, I believe, 10 miles from leesburg!!! Leesburg is southwest of the good stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 That is incorrect that would support a general 2+ Its a general 2-4 along I-95 with lolli's to 5 maybe once you get towards BAL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdsnowlover Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 what That is incorrect that would support a general 2+ what that is the third shade of green. That would indicate at least .25 in accum, correct?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share Posted January 10, 2011 all we need is development to happen 50-100 miles further south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midlo Snow Maker Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePhotoGuy Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 This ain't warning criteria for anyone west of the bay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TowsonWeather Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 That is incorrect that would support a general 2+ Ummmm...no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lsukev Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 It's spectacular that we're less than 24hrs from this event and we still can't trust a model solution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share Posted January 10, 2011 Leesburg made the .25 cut...barely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Midlo that is a wsw criterior in terms of accumulation, if that verified. Too many models giving different answers. Total 48 hr precip shows the 0.5" line into Cecil County, MD. So, perhaps with some 12:1 ratios, that would verify a WS Warning for Harford County, but the rest of the LWX area is solidly WWA with 2-4". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Wow.....this gives eastern LI a foot in 6 hrs......crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
needbiggerboat Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 all we need is development to happen 50-100 miles further south. seems like a 6-12 hour diff on either side will make or break this thing in the dc/balt region. otherwise looking ok at this juncture for 2-3 inches, except for leesburg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePhotoGuy Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Not sure if this was posted earlier: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickinBaltimore Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Forgive the weenie here, but if we go by this model, that about .50 QPF for Baltimore right? What's the ratios looking like for this storm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TowsonWeather Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 This ain't warning criteria for anyone west of the bay. Pretty sure that's pushing 5 inches up north and NE of Baltimore. Not saying I believe it - just syaing that verbatim, I think SOME of that WOULD be warning criteria. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 NAM output through 42 hrs only BWI-.33 IAD-.25 DCA-.29 a little falls after that <.10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mdsnowlover Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Total 48 hr precip shows the 0.5" line into Cecil County, MD. So, perhaps with some 12:1 ratios, that would verify a WS Warning for Harford County, but the rest of the LWX area is solidly WWA with 2-4". thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lsukev Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 seems like a 6-12 hour diff on either side will make or break this thing in the dc/balt region. otherwise looking ok at this juncture for 2-3 inches, except for leesburg Poor Leesburg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share Posted January 10, 2011 NAM QPF so far IAD .25 DCA .29 BWI: .33 PHL .34 with more coming Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaltimoreWxGuy Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Total 48 hr precip shows the 0.5" line into Cecil County, MD. So, perhaps with some 12:1 ratios, that would verify a WS Warning for Harford County, but the rest of the LWX area is solidly WWA with 2-4". Agree. Further northeast you are obviously higher accums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.