mitchnick Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 RIC-.37 CHO-.21 EZF-.30 DOVER (I HATE that fookin' place!)-.76 Easton-.62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 the nam is wrong but it's nice to see either way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 If we get 5-6" inches and they get 20" i will still be pissed off . Me too......if they get that much I want at least a foot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lsukev Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 we are one more run like this from that magical 12z euro solution from yesterday Yeah, the 18Z GFS, SREF, and the NAM all show sooner development. I wouldn't be surprised if this is a "trend" that might continue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Mitch, were those totals for the event on the NAM, or partials before the hour 60 panel? through 60 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winter_warlock Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 alot better folks!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 the nam is wrong but it's nice to see either way WIll CWG downgrade the probabilities after seeing the NAM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 the nam is wrong but it's nice to see either way Are you positive? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voodoosnowgoddess Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 RIC-.37 CHO-.21 EZF-.30 DOVER (I HATE that fookin' place!)-.76 Easton-.62 RIC still changeover??? I'm actually in the middle peninsula. Don't want any *#*&^@! sleet!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share Posted January 10, 2011 looking at the qpf in NYC is painful. Its not fair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 still snowing heavily in ENE at 66 hrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share Posted January 10, 2011 the nam is wrong but it's nice to see either way i agree...it should be showing us more snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share Posted January 10, 2011 anyone for a road trip to NYC..i dont know if i can handle this again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North Balti Zen Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 the nam is wrong but it's nice to see either way In a year of model mayhem, it's hard to get bearings. NAM led the way to the abyss for the area on the 12/26 storm, if I remember right. Doesn't mean it leads the way to goodness this time around, I suppose, but at least there is support for getting to the 4 inch or so level from the Euro. I am guessing GFS will still tell us to go pound sand in an hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 RIC still changeover??? I'm actually in the middle peninsula. Don't want any *#*&^@! sleet!! there is a change in the middle then back so snow, mix, then back to snow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluehens Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Can somebody post how ILG looks? I'd say close to 1"......won't believe it though until I see it. Although the Euro had some nice qpf numbers today and it generally seems to always be on the light side. Would like to see a 75 mile shift further south with the low to get everybody really in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin Druff Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 RIC still changeover??? I'm actually in the middle peninsula. Don't want any *#*&^@! sleet!!<br /> RIC is right on the 0*c 850 line. I think the west end is okay; you'll almost certainly mix to sleet if not ZR/RA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lsukev Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 looking at the qpf in NYC is painful. Its not fair You know they don't appreciate it. "Just an inconvenience"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 WIll CWG downgrade the probabilities after seeing the NAM? ha, doubtful. my only part of the convo was that i thought snow was virtually guaranteed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 In a year of model mayhem, it's hard to get bearings. NAM led the way to the abyss for the area on the 12/26 storm, if I remember right. Doesn't mean it leads the way to goodness this time around, I suppose, but at least there is support for getting to the 4 inch or so level from the Euro. I am guessing GFS will still tell us to go pound sand in an hour. it was DR. NO the whole time and was correct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 In a year of model mayhem, it's hard to get bearings. NAM led the way to the abyss for the area on the 12/26 storm, if I remember right. Doesn't mean it leads the way to goodness this time around, I suppose, but at least there is support for getting to the 4 inch or so level from the Euro. I am guessing GFS will still tell us to go pound sand in an hour. NAM often overdoes QPF at this range. I think that is all Ian means. What this run does do is say the Euro dropping .30 in DC has some support. GFS will be lighter, I promise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Can somebody post how ILG looks? I'd say close to 1"......won't believe it though until I see it. Although the Euro had some nice qpf numbers today and it generally seems to always be on the light side. Would like to see a 75 mile shift further south with the low to get everybody really in the game. .86" through 60 and my source is stuck at 60 hrs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 it was DR. NO the whole time and was correct come on mitch... this is a huge jump in one run and it already had recently jumped around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eekuasepinniW Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 Someone create a new thread please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 wtf eek Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted January 10, 2011 Author Share Posted January 10, 2011 wtf eek what is he doing in our thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 how much for philly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 how much for philly? .97 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhineasC Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 what is he doing in our thread? He must get a phone call when threads get above a certain length. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozz Posted January 10, 2011 Share Posted January 10, 2011 The NAM QPF is probably overdone, but what about the upper levels? The H5 levels looked really good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.