Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,585
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

Jan 11-12 Model/Forecasting Discussion


Ji

Recommended Posts

Mentioned this in the model thread in the main forum. For whatever it's worth, it's kind of interesting the 12Z GFS is apparently going back to a much colder-looking solution in the medium to longer range, which it had been backing off from on many cycles lately. Keeps a +PNA and looks like it re-generates blocking/-NAO. Not saying it's right, and it could just be one glitch from an overall trend, but whatever. Also, it's still trying to hint at doing something interesting after whatever front passes through next weekend, something it's been hinting at several times now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

FWIW the GFS long range is stinking cold....is that stuff ever coming?

Boston .74

NYC .72

Two minds with but a single thought (see my post right after yours)!! :thumbsup: Strange how it's apparently going back to that at least for this one cycle, after it has been lifting the flow quite a bit in many of its runs lately. Personally, I hope going back to a colder, more amplified solution is correct...don't much care for the rather bland/blah/warmish look it's had several times lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GGEM weakening the OH valley low wont matter because it still tracks the H5 and H7 energy through Ohio and PA. Even if there is no OH valley low, the inverted trough between the coastal and the western trough is dead until the H5 energy from out west catches up. That NEEDS to be in WV not Ohio. The H7 low has to cross over DC or else there is no mechanism to create heavy precip. Even without the OH valley low the coatal will just slide bye dry then bomb out too late once the western energy catches up. Changes in the SLP tracks wont help us at all. Our problems are at H5/H7 not the surface.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last yr was a once a century winter

well understood. But, frankly, isn't this also turning into a once in century type winter as well where Norfolk and Charlotte, hell maybe even Atlanta by Tuesday, have more snow than DC to south while at the same time Philly and New York far exceed their seasonal averages as well to the north. Has this ever happened before quite like this where the Baltimore-DC end up heading into February some of the lowest seasonal averages anywhere north of the Panhandle of Florida?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

St Mary's county and maybe KG county may even have mixing issues if the NAM (or something like it) verifies. Last night's 00z NAM at PAX NAS had 4.7°C at 4200 ft with a sfc temp of -1°C

I think they will have mixing issues, sleet an or freezing rain. This run is colder for Pax river but still gets them above freezing but more in the sleet range then rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The GGEM weakening the OH valley low wont matter because it still tracks the H5 and H7 energy through Ohio and PA. Even if there is no OH valley low, the inverted trough between the coastal and the western trough is dead until the H5 energy from out west catches up. That NEEDS to be in WV not Ohio. The H7 low has to cross over DC or else there is no mechanism to create heavy precip. Even without the OH valley low the coatal will just slide bye dry then bomb out too late once the western energy catches up. Changes in the SLP tracks wont help us at all. Our problems are at H5/H7 not the surface.

Good points. So basically, for this area, we're going to need a MIIIIRACLE! Did somebody say Miracle? (Cue that horse from "History of the World, Part I)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS

MTS-.26"

APG-.28"

imo, once the models start getting into the 20"s of hundredths of an inch is when I think we get skunked based on what has happened the last 2 weeks

none of those qpf predictions have yielded more than a coating here

its NAM or nothing, and that's a scary thought

Link to comment
Share on other sites

GFS

MTS-.26"

APG-.28"

imo, once the models start getting into the 20"s of hundredths of an inch is when I think we get skunked based on what has happened the last 2 weeks

none of those qpf predictions have yielded more than a coating here

its NAM or nothing, and that's a scary thought

I am not going to buy the NAM QPF for a while. Would be nice if the Euro dropped .3 or .4 on us. It is best on precip at this range and would give us some wiggle room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here was the 6Z run of the GFS ensembles covering same period as 12Z map above-better

06zgfsensemblep24084.gif

Look at the map in the 6z just before this one. The 12z isn't better. Not saying that it matters, don't think we'll really know until tonight. I'll be more than happy with a 2 or 3 inch snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking now that we may want the southern system to stay as far south as possible to keep the baroclinic zone further south on which the new coastal can form. Maybe it doesn't matter and its all dependent upon the trough in the OV heading east. I don't know. Any mets have the answer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look at the map in the 6z just before this one. The 12z isn't better. Not saying that it matters, don't think we'll really know until tonight. I'll be more than happy with a 2 or 3 inch snow.

yeah, actually you can't get the hours to match up perfect because its a 6 hr diff and ens forecasts only come out every 12

I went 12 hours forward

I guess I should have realized that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...