CT Rain Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Yeah we may see a band pivot near there. As long as the H7 low is south of me and I have some sort of se or e flow..I should be ok I think. Agreed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
free_man Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 12z gfs is meh. just an avg blizzard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Noyes just grabbing balls with hands and railing them into the wall Sunday morning update on impending blizzard - widespread power outages imminent Morning Update, December 26 Summary: No major changes. Blizzard conditions expected for many areas. Widespread power outages owing to wind/heavy snow weight damage. Snowfall totals of 18"-26" are likely in many interior locations of Southern New England. Amounts will be less north, ranging from 4"-6" in far northern VT/NH/ME to as much as 24" south. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomNH Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 GFS back to the dagger for central MA and NE CT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 DId DT issue a final call map that anyone saw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Forget the models, it's nowcasting time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 I like the mesoscale banding setting up near ACY oriented SSW to NNE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dryslot Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 I'll ride the NAM then. It sucks need to ride the nam and euro............. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 There's nothing about it that was last minute. It went east almost every run and look at that last devastating QPF hit out west/nw. The pivot point shifted again and now it's so early it is an absolute blizzard for you. I'm in the game still need one more shift. Could be the model just seeking out the best baroclinic zone. The 20-30 mile shift makes a world of difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RICoastalMan Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 12z gfs is meh. just an avg blizzard it sure beats the moderate nothing I've had since February Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Let's just step back a second and enjoy how incredible this is. This is by far the most positive model bust (and one of the largest) in my 15 years of model watching/forecasting. Incredible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowNH Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 I'll ride the NAM then. Not just because its better for MBY but because its a higher RES. model and is a lot better with the QPF closer to events... The GFS is really vouching for that "V" signature in hours 12-18 affecting the CT-River Valley and Central MA. What worries me now is how fast that band died that popped up over C MA. There's a lot of dry air and that could eat at heavy precip for a while ALA December 2010 KU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HarveyLeonardFan Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Fred Campagna's Profile Fred CampagnaLast significant computer model runs coming in this morning. After that, it's true storm tracking! Providence is still right on the edge of very heavy snow. There will likely be about 20 miles between 12-18" of snow and less than 5". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wxnut Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 The bigger issue isn't the wind as the "frequent gusts over 35" requirement is subjective, but the visibility at or below 1/4 mile for three straight hours. It's tough to keep the visibility that low for 3 straight hours. This thing will be producing heavy snowfall rates of 1-3"/hr for a good 6 hrs or more.. add those winds gusting 30-40 mph and you will easily have vsbys below 1/4 mile for 3 hours easy. Blizzard warnings should be reserved for the most severe winter storms.. which I think this one is shaping up to be. Don't worry about the verification.. look at the big picture. If it was up to me, I'd be going blizzard for a larger area esp in CT and central MA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowLove Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 12z gfs is meh. just an avg blizzard Is it sad that I can't tell if you're joking or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Let's just step back a second and enjoy how incredible this is. This is by far the most positive model bust (and one of the largest) in my 15 years of model watching/forecasting. Incredible. You're not kidding. This is just spectacular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OKpowdah Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 24-30 hours out, and there are huge differences between the NAM and GFS. They seemed to trend away from each other to some extent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 12z NAM still has me receiving 19" with a little taint. God I hope that is correct. Station ID: KTAN Lat: 41.87 Long: -71.02 NAM Model Run: 12Z 26DEC 2010 HR Valid 2m Tmp 2m Dpt 10m Dir 10m Spd TPrcp CPrcp 1000-500 500mb 850mb 500mb MSLP TCC PRS WX Tot Snowfall Vis Deg F Deg F deg kt in. in. Thk GPH Tmp Tmp mb % TEXT Clouds in SM 0 12/26 12Z 28 26 32 6 0.00 0.00 530 541 -7.2 -23.6 1013 0 CLR 0.0 15.1 3 12/26 15Z 32 31 34 8 0.01 0.00 531 542 -7.6 -24.2 1013 100 -SN 000OVC323 0.2 2.2 6 12/26 18Z 32 31 36 12 0.08 0.00 534 542 -7.2 -23.0 1010 100 -SN 000OVC284 0.8 0.6 9 12/26 21Z 32 32 32 18 0.20 0.00 537 540 -6.8 -18.5 1003 100 SN 001OVC308 2.0 0.3 12 12/27 00Z 32 32 33 23 0.47 0.00 539 537 -7.2 -19.4 997 100 SN 000OVC141 4.9 0.3 15 12/27 03Z 33 32 29 28 0.32 0.00 540 532 -4.8 -19.8 989 100 SN 003OVC111 3.1 0.7 18 12/27 06Z 33 33 25 27 0.31 0.00 539 523 -2.5 -22.1 980 100 SN 000OVC151 3.1 0.5 21 12/27 09Z 35 35 19 20 0.27 0.00 535 513 -0.2 -24.7 972 100 RA OVC132 0.1 1.3 24 12/27 12Z 32 32 341 20 0.31 0.00 533 508 -1.4 -25.8 969 100 SN 002OVC108 3.3 0.3 27 12/27 15Z 30 28 333 26 0.13 0.00 531 508 -3.9 -26.7 971 100 -SN OVC073 1.3 0.6 30 12/27 18Z 29 25 322 24 0.03 0.00 529 509 -8.2 -27.6 974 100 -SN OVC078 0.4 1.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moneypitmike Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 GFS not looking too good... ??????? Whyd do you say that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RICoastalMan Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Fred Campagna's Profile Fred CampagnaLast significant computer model runs coming in this morning. After that, it's true storm tracking! Providence is still right on the edge of very heavy snow. There will likely be about 20 miles between 12-18" of snow and less than 5". Fred holding his ground on a sharp cutoff in heavy snow near providence I guess. The latest gfs doesn't agree with him. Channel 12 forecasts the most snow east and south, channel 10 in between. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Pressure now down to 995mb per mesoanalysis...deepening at about 1mb per hour for the past several hours...should start really going through more rapid cyclogenesis soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Im a little surprised how low the 9z SREF probabilities are. They are really really hammering western areas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ORH_wxman Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Not just because its better for MBY but because its a higher RES. model and is a lot better with the QPF closer to events... The GFS is really vouching for that "V" signature in hours 12-18 affecting the CT-River Valley and Central MA. What worries me now is how fast that band died that popped up over C MA. There's a lot of dry air and that could eat at heavy precip for a while ALA December 2010 KU Dry is not an issue with this storm at the onset. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CT Rain Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Dry is not an issue with this storm at the onset. lol no kidding we're snowing here from just low level crap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCPSUSuperstorm2010 Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 storm down to 994mb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baroclinic Zone Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 12z GFS love for SE MA out to ORH back down into RI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCPSUSuperstorm2010 Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 55mph gusts on the southeast side of the low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Could be the model just seeking out the best baroclinic zone. The 20-30 mile shift makes a world of difference. This should close off a few hours earlier than was modeled previously as it's stronger. The stronger it is the more likely IMO (not unrational) to think it wont occlude faster/jump ENE. I really like the GFS trend. If right you'd never change. 1000-850mb you do, but its cold enough aloft, could only see you changing if you and Scott found your way into the dry slot. I wouldn't worry about QPF yet to the NW, when I refer to it I just mean it's indicative of the dynamics in an aggregate way in the model. I'm not sold it's accurate on cutting it way down on the western extremes but it is hard to deny it's done it for 6 runs in a row now on the SW/W edge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ski MRG Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 Im a little surprised how low the 9z SREF probabilities are. They are really really hammering western areas. Hmmmm. What gives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clinch Leatherwood Posted December 26, 2010 Share Posted December 26, 2010 12z GFS love for SE MA out to ORH back down into RI. Why do all these maps have a triangle semi snow hole over Kev? Error, shadow of the ORH hills? Every model hitting it now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.