Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,879
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Cajax9
    Newest Member
    Cajax9
    Joined

Napril 2025 Obs/Discussion!


Torch Tiger
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Why couldn't we get this evolution 2 months ago ughhhhh. oh well hopefully its on to EML tracking soon

It's a good question ... it's endemic to winters lately, since ~ 2002 with more coherency, where compression in the mid or core winter heights times limits the middle spectrum cyclones, but interestingly ... the rare bombs have more power..   Anyway, as the seasonal onset of lessening gradient (spring) sets the flow more flaccid ... there's a window there whence we observe more late season blocking.   More energy can then get expressed at smaller scales for one, lending to these types of systems.  But also, just in general these cold meander patterns and associated storms make springs ( autumns too ) become more wildly variable between cold snaps and warm interruptions.   This year appears to be much of this going on, but super-imposing is this lingering planetary Rossby signal, the same one that kept us chilly ( relatively so...) much of the way, anyway.

When the flow is compressed, that speeds up the baser wind velocities - it's like an exchange.  As we add one or two more of those 500 mb height lines in the total gradient, the balanced geostrophic wind speeds physically increase.  Physically, the speeding up is likely proportional to some negative interference quotient that the models seem to have issues with, particularly in the extended performance.  They seem to normalize the neg out - it may be partial in why we have trouble maintaining amplitude.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

It's a good question ... it's endemic to winters lately, since ~ 2002 with more coherency, where compression in the mid or core winter heights times limits the middle spectrum cyclones, but interestingly ... the rare bombs have more power..   Anyway, as the seasonal onset of lessening gradient (spring) sets the flow more flaccid ... there's a window there whence we observe more late season blocking.   More energy can then get expressed at smaller scales for one, lending to these types of systems.  But also, just in general these cold meander patterns and associated storms make springs ( autumns too ) become more wildly variable between cold snaps and warm interruptions.   This year appears to be much of this going on, but super-imposing is this lingering planetary Rossby signal, the same one that kept us chilly ( relatively so...) much of the way, anyway.

When the flow is compressed, that speeds up the baser wind velocities - it's like an exchange.  As we add one or two more of those 500 mb height lines in the total gradient, the balanced geostrophic wind speeds physically increase.  Physically, the speeding up is likely proportional to some negative interference quotient that the models seem to have issues with, particularly in the extended performance.  

I haven't paid much attention to this but I wonder if the recent SSW event (did it actually occur?) played a big role here. I know it's not too uncommon to get one final major SSW event between like late February and mid-March so maybe the years where that occurs and it does so to enhance block potential in our hemispheric domain...if that is what leads to these tendencies? 

But its wild how common this is or can be during April...almost like a delayed response to whatever is going on during the month of March. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

Agreed. Tomorrow night or Saturday morning could drop a few inches in spots, even in the lower elevations...with the exception of Connecticut (any accumulation or even snow will be the hills). But I think I could even sneak out an inch of snow early Saturday. 

This looks like complete poop on the mesos. Baroclincity ain't there. The surface players are also weak, surface high and low. Temps to our north and west are in the 40's...

I don't see the driver for a strong CCB into CNE/NNE. At all. The mid level low occludes over VA and starts spinning itself out...

I think we see scattered decaying precip shield as this moves north of the CT coast. Dynamics are absent.

 

1024 mb high in northeastern NB; 1008 mb low 100 miles SE BM. Synoptic pressure gradient on par with Zzzzzzz sensible weather....

  • Disagree 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

I haven't paid much attention to this but I wonder if the recent SSW event (did it actually occur?) played a big role here. I know it's not too uncommon to get one final major SSW event between like late February and mid-March so maybe the years where that occurs and it does so to enhance block potential in our hemispheric domain...if that is what leads to these tendencies? 

But its wild how common this is or can be during April...almost like a delayed response to whatever is going on during the month of March. 

Unclear (bold) .. to me, anyway.   I mean at a glance this ( below..) looks a little like a down-welling mass, but not convincingly as such compared to other more obvious/verified examples.  The morphology of this is kind of screwy... It really looks a little like both down-welling, and just simultaneous multi-layer warming took place.  Either way, clearly some residual thermal inversion sort of "spilled" ( right side ) of this graphical illustration ( source: https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat-trop/ ) ... pretty low,  low enough not to be a terrible correlation with blocking.   However, the AO did not respond so well (farther below).   If anything, smoothing out these camel toe migrations the mean's been rather positive.  So it's all unclear

image.thumb.png.c937ee318abd9e64edfbfa83caf2065f.png

image.png.9234b9db799584eea28560821bb3dda2.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

I haven't paid much attention to this but I wonder if the recent SSW event (did it actually occur?) played a big role here. I know it's not too uncommon to get one final major SSW event between like late February and mid-March so maybe the years where that occurs and it does so to enhance block potential in our hemispheric domain...if that is what leads to these tendencies? 

But its wild how common this is or can be during April...almost like a delayed response to whatever is going on during the month of March. 

Yes, IMO.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Unclear (bold) .. to me, anyway.   I mean at a glance this ( below..) looks a little like a down-welling mass, but not convincingly as such compared to other more obvious/verified examples.  The morphology of this is kind of screwy... It really looks a little like both down-welling, and just simultaneous multi-layer warming took place.  Either way, clearly some residual thermal inversion sort of "spilled" ( right side ) of this graphical illustration ( source: https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat-trop/ ) ... pretty low,  low enough not to be a terrible correlation with blocking.   However, the AO did not respond so well (farther below).   If anything, smoothing out these camel toe migrations the mean's been rather positive.  So it's all unclear

image.thumb.png.c937ee318abd9e64edfbfa83caf2065f.png

image.png.9234b9db799584eea28560821bb3dda2.png

All I got out of this is that you have camel toe :o

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

This looks like complete poop on the mesos. Baroclincity ain't there. The surface players are also weak, surface high and low. Temps to our north and west are in the 40's...

I don't see the driver for a strong CCB into CNE/NNE. At all. The mid level low occludes over VA and starts spinning itself out...

I think we see scattered decaying precip shield as this moves north of the CT coast. Dynamics are absent.

 

1024 mb high in northeastern NB; 1008 mb low 100 miles SE BM. Synoptic pressure gradient on par with Zzzzzzz sensible weather....

That is entirely possible, absolutely can't be ruled out. Guidance really is all over the place with the pieces and exactly how this evolves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

All I got out of this is that you have camel toe :o

HAHA.  ...   

might have helped if i included the y axis (height)... but the top is higher in elevation ...etc.  

just saying that a,   it's not abundantly clear this was truly a down migrating warm anomaly associated to the SSWs      and b, probably a hint to that uncertainty ( if not 'no' ), the AO didn't really demonstrate a big negative phase forcing - the correlated index depression doesn't go way up and down like that... the whole behavior is whack really.

 

image.png.4ac19c3cb6359106582cdea6cb2b5581.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

HAHA.  ...   

might have helped if i included the y axis (height)... but the top is higher in elevation ...etc.  

just saying that a,   it's not abundantly clear this was truly a down migrating warm anomaly associated to the SSWs      and b, probably a hint to that uncertainty ( if not 'no' ), the AO didn't really demonstrate a big negative phase forcing - the correlated index depression doesn't go way up and down like that... the whole behavior is whack really.

 

image.png.4ac19c3cb6359106582cdea6cb2b5581.png

I know, just being a d1ck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think SSW have some unique subtelties in their own right....perhaps some manifest a bit differently or less/more in the AO index itself for reasons not entirely understood, but I am inclined to say this had some impact....sure, there is some ambiguity, but unlike the February bottom-up deal, this one seems to have downwelled, more or less.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weatherwiz said:

Agreed. Tomorrow night or Saturday morning could drop a few inches in spots, even in the lower elevations...with the exception of Connecticut (any accumulation or even snow will be the hills). But I think I could even sneak out an inch of snow early Saturday. 

ya valleys will be tough unless we get a good burst.. but anyone above 500 or so will whiten

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...