Damage In Tolland Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago This will leave a mark up north. https://x.com/ericfisher/status/1895175803371167904?s=46&t=dhcbvkjmRcyBVQtDxJ3lRg 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 14 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Been saying this for a long time…but was told it’s not true anymore. Now NWS says it is lol. It's a very large organization of clock punchers doing tasks they are trained for. It's not a knock on their intelligence or character, but that 06 and 18z was improved recently - it's not hard to imagine the Met making the statement either doesn't know that, or, questions the "up" in the "upgrade" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 23 hours ago Author Share Posted 23 hours ago Some updated thoughts on March. https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2025/02/february-review-march-2025-preview.html 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago Keep in mind ... every system in this time range, since Thanks un-giggedy ..., has both de-amplified and sped up. In theory this thing on the 9th is setting up in less compression, but ... whenever less compression has been signaled in this same time range, it has amplified and recompressed gradually in ensuing runs The two are probably related... as the latter takes place, it starts robbing form the former. Not sure I see a compelling reason why this would be different this time but we'll see. Also, again ... the PNA is marginal on the 9th. As I was describing before, it is in the process of -d(PNA). That means that support is trying to diminish. Some wiggle room tho ... just be cognizant of that. ( yeah right!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 33 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Been saying this for a long time…but was told it’s not true anymore. Now NWS says it is lol. Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCWarrior Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 29 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: This will leave a mark up north. https://x.com/ericfisher/status/1895175803371167904?s=46&t=dhcbvkjmRcyBVQtDxJ3lRg Euro is real bad. Too amped maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago 9 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. yeah, that's kind so 1998 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 22 hours ago Author Share Posted 22 hours ago 30 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said: Keep in mind ... every system in this time range, since Thanks un-giggedy ..., has both de-amplified and sped up. In theory this thing on the 9th is setting up in less compression, but ... whenever less compression has been signaled in this same time range, it has amplified and recompressed gradually in ensuing runs The two are probably related... as the latter takes place, it starts robbing form the former. Not sure I see a compelling reason why this would be different this time but we'll see. Also, again ... the PNA is marginal on the 9th. As I was describing before, it is in the process of -d(PNA). That means that support is trying to diminish. Some wiggle room tho ... just be cognizant of that. ( yeah right!) The ridge looks to have progressed too far east to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 23 minutes ago, CoastalWx said: Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. Just saying what they said..guy works for the NWS lol. But whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted 22 hours ago Share Posted 22 hours ago 20 minutes ago, GCWarrior said: Euro is real bad. Too amped maybe? That will cool. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Layman Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago 1 hour ago, CoastalWx said: Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. Maybe the paper jammed and they needed to make something up on the spot 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 21 hours ago Share Posted 21 hours ago General 3-6" pack remaining here. higher spots in shaded areas, and nearing torched (0-2") full sun. Not bad after that onslaught 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted 20 hours ago Author Share Posted 20 hours ago I still have a good 8-10". 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 14 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: I still have a good 8-10". Yeah shaded areas tare probably a tad higher there than here ,but close.. Saw a grand tour of Methuen pack Monday, was similar to here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 3 hours ago, Typhoon Tip said: It's a very large organization of clock punchers doing tasks they are trained for. It's not a knock on their intelligence or character, but that 06 and 18z was improved recently - it's not hard to imagine the Met making the statement either doesn't know that, or, questions the "up" in the "upgrade" Well, looks like some of those clock punchers might have to learn to code: "Around 600 workers laid off by NOAA, including workers from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center - NBC" https://x.com/BNONews/status/1895252448551543275 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Kart Mozart Posted 18 hours ago Share Posted 18 hours ago 7 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: Occlussion. Lack of isentropic lift? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 27 minutes ago, Go Kart Mozart said: Lack of isentropic lift? But if it’s a bomb…wouldn’t it have that isentropic lift? Ahh, I guess it doesn’t really matter, it’s just a computer fantasy anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago whatever happens on the 9th this just 3 days later. spectacular turn around 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2Otown_WX Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago Tippy's heat burst! Could we make a run at 80? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted 17 hours ago Share Posted 17 hours ago 13 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said: whatever happens on the 9th this just 3 days later. spectacular turn around 90 in Morch is crazy if it happens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 12 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said: 90 in Morch is crazy if it happens It's been a long time, but I remember there being a real hot March where we were in the '80s almost near 90 I think. But I can't remember when that was. Maybe in the last decade? Am I imagining that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Snowcrazed71 said: It's been a long time, but I remember there being a real hot March where we were in the '80s almost near 90 I think. But I can't remember when that was. Maybe in the last decade? Am I imagining that? 2012. The Morch to end all Morches 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago wowzers, I mentioned this a few days ago. look at the opposing cosmic dildos "" Tip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago NNE pack strong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPcantmeasuresnow Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 23 minutes ago, HoarfrostHubb said: 2012. The Morch to end all Morches I might be confusing the years but wasn't that the March that had 8 consecutive days of 80 and above in Chicago? I believe for them that March ended up warmer than the following April. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 51 minutes ago, H2Otown_WX said: Tippy's heat burst! Could we make a run at 80? I’m not seeing it. 60s to 70, sure 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago Interesting season. I doubt I see more meaningful snow but I had the longest snow cover since 2021. This year was more enjoyable for a time but had less snow than last year. I canceled winter in January but was like 50% too optimistic on snow for the rest of the season. March will probably be a torch for a time here followed by cold and rain into April lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 7 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said: Interesting season. I doubt I see more meaningful snow but I had the longest snow cover since 2021. This year was more enjoyable for a time but had less snow than last year. I canceled winter in January but was like 50% too optimistic on snow for the rest of the season. March will probably be a torch for a time here followed by cold and rain into April lol. Wvit 30 said this was Ct's 7th winter in a row with below normal snowfall. Are we due or what??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted 16 hours ago Share Posted 16 hours ago 17 minutes ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said: I might be confusing the years but wasn't that the March that had 8 consecutive days of 80 and above in Chicago? I believe for them that March ended up warmer than the following April. Based on a quick google search it looks like they had 5 in a row of 80+ and 8 days of 80+ in the month. Sick stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now