Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,838
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    WichitaChiefSam
    Newest Member
    WichitaChiefSam
    Joined

March DISCO/OBS: Please End It


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

“Aardvark reimagines current weather prediction methods, offering the potential to make weather forecasts faster, cheaper, more flexible and more accurate than ever before,”

        - This mindset is one of the downfalls of our society. All you have to do is tell someone you can do something for them faster and cheaper and its like dangling a carrot in front of the horse. This crap is food for the gullible.  

 

”Tests of the Aardvark model revealed that it is able to outperform the United States national GFS forecasting system using just 10 per cent of the input data, leading researchers to say it could offer a “revolution in forecasting”.

:lol: :lol: :lol: so one of the most important aspects of forecasting, especially for short-term, which is input data...you're just going to totally reject? So what's the method, Miss Cleo's crystal ball? 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Ineedsnow gone.. disappeared like a pound of stuffing off Scooter’s Tgiving plate . 

meh I wasn't expecting much to be honest.. when the 3k NAM is the only model showing it you know its crap unless its mid level warmth.. Sometimes I just post to get some weenies going.. We could get a couple :weenie::weenie: up here Monday morning though.. I still think we pull off a couple snow events atleast in my location..  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WinterWolf said:

Ya..that already sounds like a crap day..destructive sunshine type of day. 

yup...that's what I think anyways. And we may not even get that much...eastern areas maybe a tiny bit more. But that is a good shortwave coming through with sfc cold front, cold mid-level temps, steep lapse rates, and CAA.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

“Aardvark reimagines current weather prediction methods, offering the potential to make weather forecasts faster, cheaper, more flexible and more accurate than ever before,”

        - This mindset is one of the downfalls of our society. All you have to do is tell someone you can do something for them faster and cheaper and its like dangling a carrot in front of the horse. This crap is food for the gullible.  

 

”Tests of the Aardvark model revealed that it is able to outperform the United States national GFS forecasting system using just 10 per cent of the input data, leading researchers to say it could offer a “revolution in forecasting”.

:lol: :lol: :lol: so one of the most important aspects of forecasting, especially for short-term, which is input data...you're just going to totally reject? So what's the method, Miss Cleo's crystal ball? 

Be careful this was developed by some of the premier minds in physics and Met Before you jump off a cliff read the paper. Amazing 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ginx snewx said:

Be careful this was developed by some of the premier minds in physics and Met Before you jump off a cliff read the paper. Amazing 

I'm always happy to read the papers on this stuff but when I do I always find a ton of red flags. First off, because everyone is so interested in AI and there is alot of money to be had, it is extremely easy to suck people in and its even easier to align a presentation or paper in a way that is easily going to do that. Alot of these papers will tell you about the successes but then beat around the bush when it comes to the failures. "Oh such and such did extremely well with this past storm and nailed it 6 days out and blah blah blah"...then its painted in this glorious light and all of a sudden people are hooked. 

There are so many red flags out there on this stuff but because its all lead with faster, cheaper, better...those are words which are meant to draw in an audience and from there you can easy manipulate and then just provide them with whatever they want to hear. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty soon there will be 500 different AI models out there and all it is going to do is cause even more confusion and a wide range of forecasts. You'll have the companies or whoever producing these models robbing people and industries blind because they will claim their model is "the best" and they can do it cheaper and faster. "Ohhhh my model hit a thunderstorm that hit West Palm Beach and it showed potential for tree damage on whatever Boulevard and that's exactly what happened".  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, UnitedWx said:

What you don't see reported en mass are the areas that welcome some warming. Future population redistribution?...

I don't wish to get into a protracted debate but ..,  relocation would only be a temporary safety measure, not a tactic that will deliver a long term solution.  Plus it's not really an option - realistically - when 90 or whatever iniquitous number it is, percent of the global population lives close to or in the poverty level, within drowning distance of sea-level rise and/or death from failure to maintain arable land/agraculture.  

Also, we are still inside the planetary atmosphere. No matter where we go, all systems are slaved existentially, and dependent upon it to some degree or the other - yes ...some areas more so than other are directly impacted by a changing climate, one that is outpacing regional adaptation rates ( ...uh, they can't keep up with the speed of the change ).  But other areas, indirectly so, yeah they may buy some time.  What's humanity going to do not if, but when the denial-enabling industrial bubble closes around 8 and a half billion, eating farting over extended species? - move them all to these tiny enclaves and sing Kumbaya?

good luck with that.    ...I'm not directing this sermon at you I'm just pissed off today.   LOL

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

I'm always happy to read the papers on this stuff but when I do I always find a ton of red flags. First off, because everyone is so interested in AI and there is alot of money to be had, it is extremely easy to suck people in and its even easier to align a presentation or paper in a way that is easily going to do that. Alot of these papers will tell you about the successes but then beat around the bush when it comes to the failures. "Oh such and such did extremely well with this past storm and nailed it 6 days out and blah blah blah"...then its painted in this glorious light and all of a sudden people are hooked. 

There are so many red flags out there on this stuff but because its all lead with faster, cheaper, better...those are words which are meant to draw in an audience and from there you can easy manipulate and then just provide them with whatever they want to hear. 

 

This is pervasive throughout society no matter the topic.  We all have our individual biases where we tend to agree or disagree with whichever topic du jour is being discussed and base our opinions on the data we believe is factual and relevant.  The depth of conviction of those individual beliefs and the louder one proclaims their allegiance to them often helps manipulate the audience's commitment to those ideas as you have mentioned.  Interesting stuff.  

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Layman said:

This is pervasive throughout society no matter the topic.  We all have our individual biases where we tend to agree or disagree with whichever topic du jour is being discussed and base our opinions on the data we believe is factual and relevant.  The depth of conviction of those individual beliefs and the louder one proclaims their allegiance to them often helps manipulate the audience's commitment to those ideas as you have mentioned.  Interesting stuff.  

I think alot of it is touching a dangerous line. Is there use and benefit with AI, absolutely, 100%. But at the same time I think there is a dangerous line with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, dendrite said:

35.5°

Flaking

We drove up past your area yesterday heading to Bretton Woods.  Rain/mist the entire way until we got about 2 miles onto Route 3 above Cannon.  It was beautiful up there!  Mid-50's, clear blue skies.  Night and day difference.  That recent warmth and rain sure decimated the snow depths.  Let's get this useless cold out of here and head onto 70+ degree temps!  

41 here with 0.45" or rain overnight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I don't wish to get into a protracted debate but ..,  relocation would only be a temporary safety measure, not a tactic that will deliver a long term solution.  Plus it's not really an option - realistically - when 90 or whatever iniquitous number it is, percent of the global population lives close to or in the poverty level, within drowning distance of sea-level rise and/or death from failure to maintain arable land/agraculture.  

Also, we are still inside the planetary atmosphere. No matter where we go, all systems are slaved existentially, and dependent upon it to some degree or the other - yes ...some areas more so than other are directly impacted by a changing climate, one that is outpacing regional adaptation rates ( ...uh, they can't keep up with the speed of the change ).  But other areas, indirectly so, yeah they may buy some time.  What's humanity going to do not if, but when the denial-enabling industrial bubble closes around 8 and a half billion, eating farting over extended species? - move them all to these tiny enclaves and sing Kumbaya?

good luck with that.    ...I'm not directing this sermon at you I'm just pissed off today.   LOL

Oh no offense taken, don't worry. It's just an observation I've made the last couple of years but I get your point. And even though we don't agree on everything, you're one of my favorite posters in this forum and have been for years

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...