Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,843
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Dandor3047
    Newest Member
    Dandor3047
    Joined

March DISCO/OBS: Please End It


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Layman said:

I see "science" as something very specific - a simple following of the scientific method.  A hard-line approach ensuring zero bias, reliable, concise data, etc. 

Yes, agreed.  Like a trend line of temperature dataset over 120 years angling in a consistent direction.  It is what it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Layman said:

I have personally witnessed biased, dishonest research and researchers influencing and/or altering results in both private sector and public settings at the the state and federal level so my perspective takes that heavily into consideration.  

At one time it was fervently believed that:  the sun revolved around the earth, the earth was flat, bloodletting cured illness, lobotomies cured psychological disorders, eggs are bad for you, no, eggs are good for you, no eggs raise cholesterol, no, eggs have no effect on cholesterol, etc, etc, etc, the earth is entering another ice age, no the earth is warming, etc, etc, etc.

Presumably state-of-the-art science and research to some extent has been behind each one of those beliefs or understandings.  Today, us humans believe we're at the very pinnacle of our understanding of ourselves and our world, more knowledge than any civilization ever.  Current science and research is state-of-the-art.  Just like it has been throughout time immemorial.  

Are our tools, methods, devices, understanding more precise than years past?  We sure think so.  Can that change in the future?  If the past is any guide, absolutely.  

I see "science" as something very specific - a simple following of the scientific method.  A hard-line approach ensuring zero bias, reliable, concise data, etc.  When those essential components of science are toyed with, it ruins the "science".  Changing definitions, ignoring facts, inserting bias, altering data - these are all things that have become very evident to be occurring.  Even as we're at the pinnacle of our understanding.  

So I concur, it is difficult to faithfully accept all science these days.  Maybe it has always been that way...?

Nailed it. This exposed 20 billion dollar boon doggle only strengthens your points. It's hard to believe things when grifters are manipulating 

  • Confused 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Is that when America was great? I’m still struggling to find out exactly what period of time we were that great for everyone to which we are rolling back policies for. 

There's always Poland 

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
  • Crap 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

You’re such a nice guy to debate with. Next beer is on me.

I mean we are and have been the greatest country the world has seen.  The world depends on us. Are we perfect hell no but  I will never back down to any lunatic who thinks otherwise. Sorry but your continued disparaging of our country is old 

  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1
  • Crap 1
  • 100% 1
  • saywhat? 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

Nailed it. This exposed 20 billion dollar boon doggle only strengthens your points. It's hard to believe things when grifters are manipulating 

 Love you long time even if we disagree on a lot of shit. I feel like my hickory may make a leap this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

 Love you long time even if we disagree on a lot of shit. I feel like my hickory may make a leap this year. 

Yes I love we can disagree. Good news on the Hickory. We lost a 120 footer which soon will be at the saw mill. I am gong to make a shed.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

True…so why are we rolling it back now?

Except we have not been in better shape since (gasp) 2020. We have not seen such a united country and people feeling good since then . You wake up everyday happy, confident , children safe in school  and sports, economy, gas , egg prices , etc 

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
  • Crap 6
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Except we have not been in better shape since (gasp) 2020. We have not seen such a united country and people feeling good since then . You wake up everyday happy, confident , children safe in school  and sports, economy, gas , egg prices , etc 

That is one special mind-altering bubble you live in! Lol

  • Like 3
  • Haha 2
  • Crap 1
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kdxken said:

Exactly. Old enough to remember what our rivers used to look like. The Charles and the Merrimack were cesspools. You can catch a striper in Watertown now. I'm sure the Connecticut River wasn't much better. 

Provisions in the clean water act were rolled back yesterday. Future generations will be left with much the same thing. Start cleaning it again I guess...

Quite possibly fair, but will need to be scored.  The internet has substantially empowered citizens and communities.  Company gets caught polluting river?  They go on blast.  We can have legitimate arguments over the role of federal govt, but we all bear responsibilty for how we choose to spend our dollars and for monitoring local activities.  Regardless how we feel about what's happening, I don't see the downside in taking a more proactive approach when it comes to shaming bad actors.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CoastalWx said:

I thought as humans evolve our intelligence was supposed to evolve too.

actually … no

innovation improves survivability thru technological advantages —> atrophy … failure of Darwinism —> law of lessening returns —> return to primitive state. 

grossly simplified of course 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

Even hit 49.5 here . Shorts were fine . Any sunny day with this Stein pattern and ground take the overs. 

I wonder if it will ever rain again? Forest fires will be raging next week.

The latest NAEFS guidance has increased PWAT values to near or just above 1.3" across most of southern New England. Rainfall totals could be in the 1.5" to 2" range with theGEPS and ECMWF ENS continuing to indicate a 20 percent chance that 24 hour rainfall may exceed 2" along the southern shores of RI and
MA. The GEFS, much like the deterministic GFS, continues to run slightly drier than other guidance; probs for exceeding 2" over 24 hours only reach around 10 percent over RI and southern CT, with less than 10 percent for southern MA.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...