Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,865
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Rightflank
    Newest Member
    Rightflank
    Joined

March DISCO/OBS: Please End It


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

97 was like 18 inches here Feb 78 and Jan 22 will forever it seems be my boys.

Feb 78, and Feb ‘13 were the best here. Although There’s been a lot of great ones though over the years too.  The two in Jan ‘11 were awesome. Feb 06 was great here too. 1/96 was excellent too. 4/82 was incredible too. So lots of good ones. And too many in the upper teens for accumulation amounts to list. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Every place is different obviously…22 sucked bad here…8-9” of Arctic sand.  For you guys east it was awesome. 

Every big storm has its subsidence zone. Boxing day was my sandstorm 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

True and me too. I bet everyone got the point.  We rival NNE on biggies.

More than rival.  I've been in Maine for 52 years and haven't seen a storm very close to your top two.  Lots more 8"+ events here and deeper/longer pack, but not the superbombs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dendrite said:

F science

I won’t get into it with you…but we’ve been told before by the science/and scientists in the mid 80’s and 90’s and 2000’s that there’d be no more snow in the northeast by 2015… obviously that did not happen at all.  The whole March snow thing going away won’t either.   
 

Im a little older than you…I’ve heard and seen the science fall on its face many times regarding this stuff.  It’s flawed in a big way. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Feb 78, and Feb ‘13 were the best here. Although There’s been a lot of great ones though over the years too.  The two in Jan ‘11 were awesome. Feb 06 was great here too. 1/96 was excellent too. 4/82 was incredible too. So lots of good ones. And too many in the upper teens for accumulation amounts to list. 

April 1982 is one of the 2 most powerful snowstorms I've experienced, even though its 17" total isn't in my top 20 for depth - the timing and the 60 mph gusts put it in with Feb 1961

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

That is a nasty environment across eastern AR, western TN, and southeastern MO late tomorrow evening and scary given its nighttime. I bet we end up seeing 15% hatched tornado area...I wonder if we could even see a high risk for tornadoes (30% hatched). Nothing worse than overnight events 

You really need to see a Midwest supercell in Kansas field.  Awe inspiring 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WinterWolf said:

I won’t get into it with you…but we’ve been told before by the science/and scientists in the mid 80’s and 90’s and 2000’s that there’d be no more snow in the northeast by 2015… obviously that did not happen at all.  The whole March snow thing going away won’t either.   
 

Im a little older than you…I’ve heard and seen the science fall on its face many times regarding this stuff.  It’s flawed in a big way. 

lolwut

No one said no snow in 2015. lolol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

lolwut

No one said no snow in 2015. lolol

They sure did…go ask the guy who wrote and put out the “inconvenient truth”.…He was quoting science.   The point is, the science changes all the time, and is massively flawed.  Big marches will be back as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

March is a transition month. Climo temps are warming. CO2 is increasing. Arctic ice and permafrost is decreasing. 

There will still be cold and snowy Marches. But the trend is for them to be less frequent. 

But good luck. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WinterWolf said:

They sure did…go ask the guy who wrote and put out the “inconvenient truth”.…He was quoting science.   The point is, the science changes all the time, and is massively flawed.  Big marches will be back as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow.  

There’s extreme weenies on both sides. No sane person who knows anything about this stuff thought we would be snowless a decade ago. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Nah…I don’t think so.  I heard this before when I was a kid, and it didn’t happen. This won’t either. 

Once it flips back there will be plenty of great Marchs. Man the Green New Deal grifts being exposed to the tune of billions of dollars are insane. We always knew about Al Gores grift but now the Michael Manns of the world are being exposed.  Lemmings are suddenly confronted about the climate scam. Nothing to do with the science it was all about the Benjamin's 

  • Crap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dendrite said:

March is a transition month. Climo temps are warming. CO2 is increasing. Arctic ice and permafrost is decreasing. 

There will still be cold and snowy Marches. But the trend is for them to be less frequent. 

But good luck. 

Good luck to you too…they were decreasing before too we were told…then we still get them…no more or less frequent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

I won’t get into it with you…but we’ve been told before by the science/and scientists in the mid 80’s and 90’s and 2000’s that there’d be no more snow in the northeast by 2015… obviously that did not happen at all.  The whole March snow thing going away won’t either.   
 

Im a little older than you…I’ve heard and seen the science fall on its face many times regarding this stuff.  It’s flawed in a big way. 

The only people saying climate change will lead to no more snow or no more cold (for us) are agenda driven clowns. There is a ton of misinformation on climate change that is tossed around, absolutely. The true science behind it all is not flawed. All one needs is a basic understanding of atmospheric physics and basic understanding of meteorology and the path to understanding what is going on is as straight as an arrow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dendrite said:

There’s extreme weenies on both sides. No sane person who knows anything about this stuff thought we would be snowless a decade ago. 

This was said in the mid 2000’s(9 years before ‘15), and it was said in the very lean snow 80’s and early 90’s.  Then the mid 90’s happened, and then the mega snow of the first 20 yrs or so of this century.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

lol wtf is going on. Climate hoax while your normals climb 1-2F every 10 years. 

The hoax is not the Science it's the grift.The science in my mind is pretty good but flaws exist. One example is The NWS allowing 2 degree variance in ASOS temps. IDK that isn't sound science 

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said:

The hoax is not the Science it's the grift.The science in my mind is pretty good but flaws exist. One example is The NWS allowing 2 degree variance in ASOS temps. IDK that isn't sound science 

But that is used to further the narrative…not sound at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...