WinterWolf Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 3 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: 97 was like 18 inches here Feb 78 and Jan 22 will forever it seems be my boys. Feb 78, and Feb ‘13 were the best here. Although There’s been a lot of great ones though over the years too. The two in Jan ‘11 were awesome. Feb 06 was great here too. 1/96 was excellent too. 4/82 was incredible too. So lots of good ones. And too many in the upper teens for accumulation amounts to list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 1 minute ago, dendrite said: Ok denier Just keeping it real..you’ll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 2 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Hard to beat 18 hrs of visibility under a 1/4 mile sometimes zero. It was unreal in 22 Every place is different obviously…22 sucked bad here…8-9” of Arctic sand. For you guys east it was awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 That is a nasty environment across eastern AR, western TN, and southeastern MO late tomorrow evening and scary given its nighttime. I bet we end up seeing 15% hatched tornado area...I wonder if we could even see a high risk for tornadoes (30% hatched). Nothing worse than overnight events 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 2 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Just keeping it real..you’ll see. F science 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 2 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Every place is different obviously…22 sucked bad here…8-9” of Arctic sand. For you guys east it was awesome. Every big storm has its subsidence zone. Boxing day was my sandstorm 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamarack Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 15 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: True and me too. I bet everyone got the point. We rival NNE on biggies. More than rival. I've been in Maine for 52 years and haven't seen a storm very close to your top two. Lots more 8"+ events here and deeper/longer pack, but not the superbombs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 4 minutes ago, dendrite said: F science I won’t get into it with you…but we’ve been told before by the science/and scientists in the mid 80’s and 90’s and 2000’s that there’d be no more snow in the northeast by 2015… obviously that did not happen at all. The whole March snow thing going away won’t either. Im a little older than you…I’ve heard and seen the science fall on its face many times regarding this stuff. It’s flawed in a big way. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Nothing will be 3/31-4/1 97. Maybe it's the euphoria of such an epic positive bust and the dumbfounded look on the OCMs 6PM broadcast...but I really have a tough time seeing that beat. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamarack Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 10 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Feb 78, and Feb ‘13 were the best here. Although There’s been a lot of great ones though over the years too. The two in Jan ‘11 were awesome. Feb 06 was great here too. 1/96 was excellent too. 4/82 was incredible too. So lots of good ones. And too many in the upper teens for accumulation amounts to list. April 1982 is one of the 2 most powerful snowstorms I've experienced, even though its 17" total isn't in my top 20 for depth - the timing and the 60 mph gusts put it in with Feb 1961 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 10 minutes ago, weatherwiz said: That is a nasty environment across eastern AR, western TN, and southeastern MO late tomorrow evening and scary given its nighttime. I bet we end up seeing 15% hatched tornado area...I wonder if we could even see a high risk for tornadoes (30% hatched). Nothing worse than overnight events You really need to see a Midwest supercell in Kansas field. Awe inspiring 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Yeah, those equations are wrong. Math is all wrong. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 1 minute ago, WinterWolf said: I won’t get into it with you…but we’ve been told before by the science/and scientists in the mid 80’s and 90’s and 2000’s that there’d be no more snow in the northeast by 2015… obviously that did not happen at all. The whole March snow thing going away won’t either. Im a little older than you…I’ve heard and seen the science fall on its face many times regarding this stuff. It’s flawed in a big way. lolwut No one said no snow in 2015. lolol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Just now, dendrite said: lolwut No one said no snow in 2015. lolol They sure did…go ask the guy who wrote and put out the “inconvenient truth”.…He was quoting science. The point is, the science changes all the time, and is massively flawed. Big marches will be back as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 March is a transition month. Climo temps are warming. CO2 is increasing. Arctic ice and permafrost is decreasing. There will still be cold and snowy Marches. But the trend is for them to be less frequent. But good luck. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavisStraight Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 13 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said: Every big storm has its subsidence zone. Boxing day was my sandstorm Mine too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Just now, WinterWolf said: They sure did…go ask the guy who wrote and put out the “inconvenient truth”.…He was quoting science. The point is, the science changes all the time, and is massively flawed. Big marches will be back as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow. There’s extreme weenies on both sides. No sane person who knows anything about this stuff thought we would be snowless a decade ago. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 30 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: Nah…I don’t think so. I heard this before when I was a kid, and it didn’t happen. This won’t either. Once it flips back there will be plenty of great Marchs. Man the Green New Deal grifts being exposed to the tune of billions of dollars are insane. We always knew about Al Gores grift but now the Michael Manns of the world are being exposed. Lemmings are suddenly confronted about the climate scam. Nothing to do with the science it was all about the Benjamin's 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 I think it more interesting that the bulk has occurred since 2000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 1 minute ago, dendrite said: March is a transition month. Climo temps are warming. CO2 is increasing. Arctic ice and permafrost is decreasing. There will still be cold and snowy Marches. But the trend is for them to be less frequent. But good luck. Good luck to you too…they were decreasing before too we were told…then we still get them…no more or less frequent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherwiz Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 4 minutes ago, WinterWolf said: I won’t get into it with you…but we’ve been told before by the science/and scientists in the mid 80’s and 90’s and 2000’s that there’d be no more snow in the northeast by 2015… obviously that did not happen at all. The whole March snow thing going away won’t either. Im a little older than you…I’ve heard and seen the science fall on its face many times regarding this stuff. It’s flawed in a big way. The only people saying climate change will lead to no more snow or no more cold (for us) are agenda driven clowns. There is a ton of misinformation on climate change that is tossed around, absolutely. The true science behind it all is not flawed. All one needs is a basic understanding of atmospheric physics and basic understanding of meteorology and the path to understanding what is going on is as straight as an arrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 lol wtf is going on. Climate hoax while your normals climb 1-2F every 10 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dendrite Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 MAGAGW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 1 minute ago, dendrite said: There’s extreme weenies on both sides. No sane person who knows anything about this stuff thought we would be snowless a decade ago. This was said in the mid 2000’s(9 years before ‘15), and it was said in the very lean snow 80’s and early 90’s. Then the mid 90’s happened, and then the mega snow of the first 20 yrs or so of this century. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginx snewx Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Just now, dendrite said: lol wtf is going on. Climate hoax while your normals climb 1-2F every 10 years. The hoax is not the Science it's the grift.The science in my mind is pretty good but flaws exist. One example is The NWS allowing 2 degree variance in ASOS temps. IDK that isn't sound science 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 2 minutes ago, dendrite said: lol wtf is going on. Climate hoax while your normals climb 1-2F every 10 years. Climate is always changing bro…it always has, that’s what it does; -up and down, up and down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Just now, Ginx snewx said: The hoax is not the Science it's the grift.The science in my mind is pretty good but flaws exist. One example is The NWS allowing 2 degree variance in ASOS temps. IDK that isn't sound science Exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 gaslighting people's experience with winter is difficult when the climate does the gaslighting already - hahaha Hey, check out this nerdy neat demarcation of how this air mass back-doored down the M/A https://weather.cod.edu/satrad/?parms=subregional-Virginias-02-24-1-100-1&checked=map&colorbar=undefined Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 This is why we do the dews now. Summer's are becoming like the outer banks. Lets go. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 1 minute ago, Ginx snewx said: The hoax is not the Science it's the grift.The science in my mind is pretty good but flaws exist. One example is The NWS allowing 2 degree variance in ASOS temps. IDK that isn't sound science But that is used to further the narrative…not sound at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now