Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,759
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SolsticeSnow
    Newest Member
    SolsticeSnow
    Joined

March DISCO/OBS: Please End It


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Been saying this for a long time…but was told it’s not true anymore. Now NWS says it is lol. 

It's a very large organization of clock punchers doing tasks they are trained for.

It's not a knock on their intelligence or character, but that 06 and 18z was improved recently - it's not hard to imagine the Met making the statement either doesn't know that, or, questions the "up" in the "upgrade" 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep in mind ... every system in this time range, since Thanks un-giggedy ..., has both de-amplified and sped up.   In theory this thing on the 9th is setting up in less compression, but ... whenever less compression has been signaled in this same time range, it has amplified and recompressed gradually in ensuing runs  

The two are probably related... as the latter takes place, it starts robbing form the former.   Not sure I see a compelling reason why this would be different this time but we'll see. 

Also, again ... the PNA is marginal on the 9th.  As I was describing before, it is in the process of -d(PNA).  That means that support is trying to diminish.  Some wiggle room tho ... just be cognizant of that.    ( yeah right!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Been saying this for a long time…but was told it’s not true anymore. Now NWS says it is lol. 

Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. 

yeah, that's kind so 1998

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Keep in mind ... every system in this time range, since Thanks un-giggedy ..., has both de-amplified and sped up.   In theory this thing on the 9th is setting up in less compression, but ... whenever less compression has been signaled in this same time range, it has amplified and recompressed gradually in ensuing runs  

The two are probably related... as the latter takes place, it starts robbing form the former.   Not sure I see a compelling reason why this would be different this time but we'll see. 

Also, again ... the PNA is marginal on the 9th.  As I was describing before, it is in the process of -d(PNA).  That means that support is trying to diminish.  Some wiggle room tho ... just be cognizant of that.    ( yeah right!)

The ridge looks to have progressed too far east to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. 

Just saying what they said..guy works for the NWS lol.  But whatever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CoastalWx said:

Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. 

Maybe the paper jammed and they needed to make something up on the spot

image.thumb.png.66362a33eed116d523d9085fbd225a2b.png

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Typhoon Tip said:

It's a very large organization of clock punchers doing tasks they are trained for.

It's not a knock on their intelligence or character, but that 06 and 18z was improved recently - it's not hard to imagine the Met making the statement either doesn't know that, or, questions the "up" in the "upgrade" 

Well, looks like some of those clock punchers might have to learn to code:

"Around 600 workers laid off by NOAA, including workers from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center - NBC"  https://x.com/BNONews/status/1895252448551543275

  • Sad 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

90 in Morch is crazy if it happens 

It's been a long time, but I remember there being a real hot March where we were in the '80s almost near 90 I think. But I can't remember when that was. Maybe in the last decade? Am I imagining that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting season. I doubt I see more meaningful snow but I had the longest snow cover since 2021. This year was more enjoyable for a time but had less snow than last year. I canceled winter in January but was like 50% too optimistic on snow for the rest of the season. March will probably be a torch for a time here followed by cold and rain into April lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Interesting season. I doubt I see more meaningful snow but I had the longest snow cover since 2021. This year was more enjoyable for a time but had less snow than last year. I canceled winter in January but was like 50% too optimistic on snow for the rest of the season. March will probably be a torch for a time here followed by cold and rain into April lol.

Wvit 30 said this was Ct's 7th winter in a row with below normal snowfall. Are we due or what???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CPcantmeasuresnow said:

I might be confusing the years but wasn't that the March that had 8 consecutive days of 80 and above in Chicago? I believe for them that March ended up warmer than the following April. 

Based on a quick google search it looks like they had 5 in a row of 80+ and 8 days of 80+ in the month.  Sick stuff 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...