Damage In Tolland Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 This will leave a mark up north. https://x.com/ericfisher/status/1895175803371167904?s=46&t=dhcbvkjmRcyBVQtDxJ3lRg 1 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 On 2/27/2025 at 7:34 PM, WinterWolf said: Been saying this for a long time…but was told it’s not true anymore. Now NWS says it is lol. Expand It's a very large organization of clock punchers doing tasks they are trained for. It's not a knock on their intelligence or character, but that 06 and 18z was improved recently - it's not hard to imagine the Met making the statement either doesn't know that, or, questions the "up" in the "upgrade" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 27 Author Share Posted February 27 Some updated thoughts on March. https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2025/02/february-review-march-2025-preview.html 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 Keep in mind ... every system in this time range, since Thanks un-giggedy ..., has both de-amplified and sped up. In theory this thing on the 9th is setting up in less compression, but ... whenever less compression has been signaled in this same time range, it has amplified and recompressed gradually in ensuing runs The two are probably related... as the latter takes place, it starts robbing form the former. Not sure I see a compelling reason why this would be different this time but we'll see. Also, again ... the PNA is marginal on the 9th. As I was describing before, it is in the process of -d(PNA). That means that support is trying to diminish. Some wiggle room tho ... just be cognizant of that. ( yeah right!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoastalWx Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 On 2/27/2025 at 7:34 PM, WinterWolf said: Been saying this for a long time…but was told it’s not true anymore. Now NWS says it is lol. Expand Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GCWarrior Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 On 2/27/2025 at 7:42 PM, Damage In Tolland said: This will leave a mark up north. https://x.com/ericfisher/status/1895175803371167904?s=46&t=dhcbvkjmRcyBVQtDxJ3lRg Expand Euro is real bad. Too amped maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 On 2/27/2025 at 8:09 PM, CoastalWx said: Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. Expand yeah, that's kind so 1998 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 27 Author Share Posted February 27 On 2/27/2025 at 7:56 PM, Typhoon Tip said: Keep in mind ... every system in this time range, since Thanks un-giggedy ..., has both de-amplified and sped up. In theory this thing on the 9th is setting up in less compression, but ... whenever less compression has been signaled in this same time range, it has amplified and recompressed gradually in ensuing runs The two are probably related... as the latter takes place, it starts robbing form the former. Not sure I see a compelling reason why this would be different this time but we'll see. Also, again ... the PNA is marginal on the 9th. As I was describing before, it is in the process of -d(PNA). That means that support is trying to diminish. Some wiggle room tho ... just be cognizant of that. ( yeah right!) Expand The ridge looks to have progressed too far east to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 On 2/27/2025 at 8:09 PM, CoastalWx said: Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. Expand Just saying what they said..guy works for the NWS lol. But whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 On 2/27/2025 at 8:13 PM, GCWarrior said: Euro is real bad. Too amped maybe? Expand That will cool. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Layman Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 On 2/27/2025 at 8:09 PM, CoastalWx said: Must be an 80 yr old met saying that because this isn't 2002 anymore. Remote sensing certainly has become better and from what I understand, there is not a statistically significant drop off in accuracy during off hour runs. Expand Maybe the paper jammed and they needed to make something up on the spot 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 General 3-6" pack remaining here. higher spots in shaded areas, and nearing torched (0-2") full sun. Not bad after that onslaught 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted February 27 Author Share Posted February 27 I still have a good 8-10". 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 On 2/27/2025 at 11:12 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: I still have a good 8-10". Expand Yeah shaded areas tare probably a tad higher there than here ,but close.. Saw a grand tour of Methuen pack Monday, was similar to here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
78Blizzard Posted February 27 Share Posted February 27 On 2/27/2025 at 7:49 PM, Typhoon Tip said: It's a very large organization of clock punchers doing tasks they are trained for. It's not a knock on their intelligence or character, but that 06 and 18z was improved recently - it's not hard to imagine the Met making the statement either doesn't know that, or, questions the "up" in the "upgrade" Expand Well, looks like some of those clock punchers might have to learn to code: "Around 600 workers laid off by NOAA, including workers from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center - NBC" https://x.com/BNONews/status/1895252448551543275 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Go Kart Mozart Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 On 2/27/2025 at 6:02 PM, 40/70 Benchmark said: Occlussion. Expand Lack of isentropic lift? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWolf Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 On 2/28/2025 at 1:09 AM, Go Kart Mozart said: Lack of isentropic lift? Expand But if it’s a bomb…wouldn’t it have that isentropic lift? Ahh, I guess it doesn’t really matter, it’s just a computer fantasy anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoon Tip Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 whatever happens on the 9th this just 3 days later. spectacular turn around 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2Otown_WX Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Tippy's heat burst! Could we make a run at 80? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damage In Tolland Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 On 2/28/2025 at 1:57 AM, Typhoon Tip said: whatever happens on the 9th this just 3 days later. spectacular turn around Expand 90 in Morch is crazy if it happens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 On 2/28/2025 at 2:10 AM, Damage In Tolland said: 90 in Morch is crazy if it happens Expand It's been a long time, but I remember there being a real hot March where we were in the '80s almost near 90 I think. But I can't remember when that was. Maybe in the last decade? Am I imagining that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 On 2/28/2025 at 2:23 AM, Snowcrazed71 said: It's been a long time, but I remember there being a real hot March where we were in the '80s almost near 90 I think. But I can't remember when that was. Maybe in the last decade? Am I imagining that? Expand 2012. The Morch to end all Morches 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 wowzers, I mentioned this a few days ago. look at the opposing cosmic dildos "" Tip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torch Tiger Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 NNE pack strong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPcantmeasuresnow Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 On 2/28/2025 at 2:28 AM, HoarfrostHubb said: 2012. The Morch to end all Morches Expand I might be confusing the years but wasn't that the March that had 8 consecutive days of 80 and above in Chicago? I believe for them that March ended up warmer than the following April. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUNNAWAYICEBERG Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 On 2/28/2025 at 2:05 AM, H2Otown_WX said: Tippy's heat burst! Could we make a run at 80? Expand I’m not seeing it. 60s to 70, sure 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxWatcher007 Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 Interesting season. I doubt I see more meaningful snow but I had the longest snow cover since 2021. This year was more enjoyable for a time but had less snow than last year. I canceled winter in January but was like 50% too optimistic on snow for the rest of the season. March will probably be a torch for a time here followed by cold and rain into April lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowcrazed71 Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 On 2/28/2025 at 2:58 AM, WxWatcher007 said: Interesting season. I doubt I see more meaningful snow but I had the longest snow cover since 2021. This year was more enjoyable for a time but had less snow than last year. I canceled winter in January but was like 50% too optimistic on snow for the rest of the season. March will probably be a torch for a time here followed by cold and rain into April lol. Expand Wvit 30 said this was Ct's 7th winter in a row with below normal snowfall. Are we due or what??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoarfrostHubb Posted February 28 Share Posted February 28 On 2/28/2025 at 2:54 AM, CPcantmeasuresnow said: I might be confusing the years but wasn't that the March that had 8 consecutive days of 80 and above in Chicago? I believe for them that March ended up warmer than the following April. Expand Based on a quick google search it looks like they had 5 in a row of 80+ and 8 days of 80+ in the month. Sick stuff 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now