Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,759
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SolsticeSnow
    Newest Member
    SolsticeSnow
    Joined

March DISCO/OBS: Please End It


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't see this March being an atypical New England March. We're going to have mild periods (perhaps even unseasonably warm for a day or two at a time) but we'll also have our share of colder periods. Looks like we could be dealing with a pretty progressive weather pattern heading into March...but again, not totally uncommon for March.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

I don't see this March being an atypical New England March. We're going to have mild periods (perhaps even unseasonably warm for a day or two at a time) but we'll also have our share of colder periods. Looks like we could be dealing with a pretty progressive weather pattern heading into March...but again, not totally uncommon for March.

Not sure what you are looking at when you say, "I don't see"  but compendium of classical indicators are warmer than your characterization.  

If those indicators were nominal, ...no problem.   But that is not the case.  They are pointed up.

Otherwise, why are there indicators at all if one is not going to use them?   But beyond that... they are useful and that's been demonstrated enough in the past to be empirical and objective.  

Is it fair to say they are not always correct?  sure -    But, so long as we are staring at a wash of +2SD AO(NAO), +2SD EPO, whilst -2SD PNA from ~ the 10th thru the 18th, ... perturbations along the way not withstanding, and not appearing disruptive, it becomes unclear how someone might come to the conclusion that they don't see how -

LOL      good luck.    I don't wish to gaslight anyone's perceptions - it's just that these indicators ... I'm not making this shit up.  There's that,... plus the intangibles - like the recent decadal trends for spring warm burst synoptic events.  Or the longer term indicator of La Nina's sometimes ( but not always...) setting up springs that are decidedly above normal.   Or the CC background elephant taking big shits in the room at all times, smelling like we go above average anyway ...  

I actually "see" it the other way.  It'll be interesting to see which way it goes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Not sure what you are looking at when you say, "I don't see"  but compendium of classical indicators are warmer than your characterization.  

If those indicators were nominal, ...no problem.   But that is not the case.  They are pointed up.

Otherwise, why are there indicators at all if one is not going to use them?   But beyond that... they are useful and that's been demonstrated enough in the past to be empirical and objective.  

Is it fair to say they are not always correct?  sure -    But, so long as we are staring at a wash of +2SD AO(NAO), +2SD EPO, whilst -2SD PNA from ~ the 10th thru the 18th, ... perturbations along the way not withstanding, and not appearing disruptive, it becomes unclear how someone might come to the conclusion that they don't see how -

LOL      good luck.    I don't wish to gaslight anyone's perceptions - these indicators ... I'm not making this shit up.  There's that,... plus the intangibles - like the recent decadal trends for spring warm burst synoptic events.  Or the longer term indicator of La Nina's sometimes ( but not always...) setting up springs that are decidedly above normal.   Or the CC background elephant taking big shits in the room at all times, smelling like we go above average anyway ...  

I actually "see" it the other way.  It'll be interesting to see which way it goes. 

When it comes to anomalous spring time warmth in our region I just exercise extreme caution. I agree with you the teleconnectors and classical indicators are there, however, as you are well aware this time of year little mesoscale and smaller-scale nuisances can outweigh any of those signals. This is why you can't just run off H5 anomalies...H5 could be baking us with 570dm+ heights but the surface could yield an entirely different story. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

When it comes to anomalous spring time warmth in our region I just exercise extreme caution. I agree with you the teleconnectors and classical indicators are there, however, as you are well aware this time of year little mesoscale and smaller-scale nuisances can outweigh any of those signals. This is why you can't just run off H5 anomalies...H5 could be baking us with 570dm+ heights but the surface could yield an entirely different story. 

That's true anyway...  

Whether they manifest or not?  fair enough, that can't really be ascertained.   But I'm not sure those should limit you to "not seeing" a pathway toward an anomalous warm period  - which by the way, I'm not talking about the whole spring.  This was the mid March stuff...   Anyway, some years have big warmth, early - so yeah ...sometimes the BS can be suppressed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

That's true anyway...  

Whether they manifest or not?  fair enough, that can't really be ascertained.   But I'm not sure those should limit you to "not seeing" a pathway toward an anomalous warm period  - which by the way, I'm not talking about the whole spring.  This was the mid March stuff...   Anyway, some years have big warmth, early - so yeah ...sometimes the BS can be suppressed.

Weenie range on EPS and GEFS was loading up an epic torch at 500mb.. here’s the surface on EPS 

IMG_5746.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CoastalWx said:

I like how models are trying to engineer a low developing on the frontal boundary from the low cutting NW of us later next week. That will whiff and cancel any coastal hopes. 

Lol I think it's time you give up and just come back next year. Your mind is 100% made up that we are through. We get it

  • Haha 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

Lol I think it's time you give up and just come back next year. Your mind is 100% made up that we are through. We get it

He’s addicted to this place..he’s in here in the summer when there’s really nobody here talking about HHH….and if we hit 88 or 93.  Why do ya think he has close to 200,000 posts.  He can never leave…he’d need to be narcanned. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Typhoon Tip said:

That's true anyway...  

Whether they manifest or not?  fair enough, that can't really be ascertained.   But I'm not sure those should limit you to "not seeing" a pathway toward an anomalous warm period  - which by the way, I'm not talking about the whole spring.  This was the mid March stuff...   Anyway, some years have big warmth, early - so yeah ...sometimes the BS can be suppressed.

Agreed...I was just stating that because of the progressive nature of the pattern whatever anomalous warmth we see probably won't be sustained. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

He’s addicted to this place..he’s in here in the summer when there’s really nobody here talking about HHH except that dweeb, John ….and if we hit 88 or 93.  Why do ya think he has close to 200,000 posts.  He can never leave…he’d need to be narcanned. 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, brooklynwx99 said:

all ensembles maintain a signal for the 9-10th, just a matter of phasing. worth keeping an eye on

Looks here like what Scott was saying ... impressions like a kink low on a front.  

There's some deep members here ... but it also could be proximity to the pressure well associated with that deep maritime vortex just along the NE edge of this frame... I'd also caution that numerical support for a system on the 9th-10th is waning.  Seems like a candidate for losing amplitude as it nears

image.png.02af3eb4521c8725d7983f8283016263.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...