Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,759
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    SolsticeSnow
    Newest Member
    SolsticeSnow
    Joined

March Medium/ Long Range


Weather Will
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, mitchnick said:

That explains the jump in VA & WVA on the 24hr snowfall mean. 

Yeah lol - I mean it’s a better GEFS run if that is even a remote possibility but the jump in the ens is largely, if not entirely, that one member. The median didn’t jump all that much which was a flag that something was affecting the average 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Heisy said:

GEFs just lit up


.

Not really. Even when there appears to be a decent signal on the mean, its a half dozen members that have snow for our region in the March 8-10 window. No real consistency from one model cycle to the next either. Still time, and if we get that absolute perfect timing it might work out. I kinda think there will be a smallish scale semi-dynamic system at some point that produces a few inches of wet snow-ideally timed overnight- and it will ofc be gone by noon the next day. That's typical March stuff. There is nothing about the upcoming pattern that suggests anything like the St Patty's day storm of several years back is possible, with anomalous cold and significant snow falling during the daytime.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Blizzard of 93 said:

Agreed, the period from the 8th through the 10th certainly has potential.

 

There appear to be timing differences on the 18z GEFS at this range with 2 main heavier precip windows between the 8th & 10th.

Hopefully we get 1 more to track before we close the blinds for good.

Here is the 4 day snow map for the period to show the timing differences at this range.

IMG_9282.png

IMG_9284.png

IMG_9283.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, winter_warlock said:

 Ensembles for  hour 318 are about as reliable as theNFL refs lol

Seeing as you've been here for years, I know you know this but I'll say it anyway...Isn't this is a long range thread. So we're gonna talk about well, long range! Repeating over and over about model inaccuracy whenever somebody mentions anything LR doesn't add much...like bro, everybody knows the inaccuracies hence the term fantasy range. It's just looking at an area of potential and ya just see if it gets closer or not. It's just LR analysis--it's all low confidence, lol

  • Like 1
  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Stormchaserchuck1 said:

It's not like a pattern that's going to bust colder, without much going on in the upper latitudes. Best we have going is that the NAO is no longer strong positive.. it goes to neutral.  Maybe a better chance up your way.. 

For a while, the operational models were completely clueless and showing nonsense cold and troughiness for some reason. Not really seeing that as much now, with the OP GFS even suggesting a reload of the warmth at the very end of its 06z run. Maybe 2012 is a decent analog after all...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Heisy said:

6z euro Ai now on board for a major storm but it’s too warm, the lead wave doesn’t quite get us cold enough.

If that happened I’d probably drive somewhere though at least

00580798a3b9eece4a448d91c05300ba.jpg
bc4c4075a0caa9889b88b1c6a344736f.jpg


.

It's 10:1 and temps are marginal,so it overdone even if it occurred as depicted. So it would still be a fail imby in all likelihood acting as the final dagger in the back of this winter by missing me to the north instead of south. 

Do I have the weenie mentality down or what? Lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Maestrobjwa said:

Seeing as you've been here for years, I know you know this but I'll say it anyway...Isn't this is a long range thread. So we're gonna talk about well, long range! Repeating over and over about model inaccuracy whenever somebody mentions anything LR doesn't add much...like bro, everybody knows the inaccuracies hence the term fantasy range. It's just looking at an area of potential and ya just see if it gets closer or not. It's just LR analysis--it's all low confidence, lol

Weather needs many more like he and I on board 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...