psuhoffman Posted Tuesday at 05:51 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:51 PM 30 minutes ago, WEATHER53 said: One method of improvement would be to shorten the time frame length of prediction The wind events we’ve had twice in last two weeks were perfectly handled because nothing was said until 3 days in advance. The most recent models failure began about 10 days ago with an impulse traversing the nation and supposedly setting off low pressure down south that comes up here. Too speculative that’s DC would get a bomb based on 7/8 days of required perfection as that impulse traverses the nation. Models can’t perform in mid Atlantic for wintry precip that far out and in those circumstances . So cut it out. For some reason NHC does not have such problems. Excuses are that it’s just all too complex. So just eliminate what can’t be done accurately and don’t latch onto impulse Before they even come ashore out west . Wait until 3/4 days out and something is actually existing on this half side of the country I agree with your point about making predictions on unrealistic time leads. But I don’t get your NHC point. Their avg error at 5 days is over 150 miles. It’s that about what the error here was? How is this any different? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted Tuesday at 05:53 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:53 PM Right where we want it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warm Nose Posted Tuesday at 05:54 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:54 PM Just now, psuhoffman said: Right where we want it SO, in South Carolina then ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted Tuesday at 05:57 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:57 PM Look at that beautiful snowhole on the gfs 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
87storms Posted Tuesday at 05:59 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 05:59 PM 15 minutes ago, Amped said: Euro bumped me up from .1 to .2". If it keeps doubling for 7 more runs I can get my 25.6" back. Math checks out. Well played on using 25.6 given a starting point of 0.1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dallen7908 Posted Tuesday at 06:00 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:00 PM 1 hour ago, bncho said: according to the NAM, DC will get 6 inches of snow. at least? StnID: kdca Profile Thermal Adjust: 0.0 Cloud RH threshold: 85% Average Hourly Sounding: NO Date/hour FHr Wind SfcT Ptype SR |Snow||Sleet|| FZRA|| QPF CumSR|TotSN||TotPL||TotZR|| TQPF S%| I%| L% ============================================================================================================================ 250218/1300Z 1 32009KT 23.3F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250218/1400Z 2 31011KT 24.0F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250218/1500Z 3 30011KT 24.5F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250218/1600Z 4 30011KT 25.8F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250218/1700Z 5 30011KT 26.9F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250218/1800Z 6 30011KT 27.4F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 250218/1900Z 7 29010KT 27.8F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250218/2000Z 8 30010KT 28.1F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250218/2100Z 9 30009KT 28.7F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250218/2200Z 10 31008KT 27.6F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250218/2300Z 11 32007KT 25.2F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/0000Z 12 33007KT 23.8F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 250219/0100Z 13 34007KT 22.5F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/0200Z 14 33007KT 21.5F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/0300Z 15 34007KT 20.7F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/0400Z 16 33006KT 19.3F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/0500Z 17 33006KT 18.4F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/0600Z 18 33007KT 17.9F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 250219/0700Z 19 33006KT 17.1F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/0800Z 20 33006KT 17.0F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/0900Z 21 33006KT 16.4F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/1000Z 22 33005KT 16.4F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/1100Z 23 33005KT 15.3F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/1200Z 24 33005KT 16.4F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 250219/1300Z 25 33006KT 17.5F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/1400Z 26 32006KT 18.9F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/1500Z 27 33006KT 19.5F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/1600Z 28 33005KT 21.1F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/1700Z 29 33005KT 21.6F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/1800Z 30 33005KT 22.2F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 250219/1900Z 31 33005KT 22.4F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/2000Z 32 32003KT 22.7F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/2100Z 33 VRB01KT 21.6F 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.000 0:1| 0.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.00 0| 0| 0 250219/2200Z 34 VRB01KT 20.7F SNOW 13:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.009 13:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.01 100| 0| 0 250219/2300Z 35 VRB02KT 21.1F SNOW 14:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.010 13:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.02 100| 0| 0 250220/0000Z 36 VRB01KT 21.3F SNOW 18:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.009 15:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.03 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 250220/0100Z 37 33003KT 21.5F SNOW 19:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.019 16:1| 0.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.05 100| 0| 0 250220/0200Z 38 36005KT 21.5F SNOW 20:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.019 17:1| 1.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.06 100| 0| 0 250220/0300Z 39 36009KT 21.5F SNOW 20:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.009 18:1| 1.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.07 100| 0| 0 250220/0400Z 40 01008KT 21.6F SNOW 19:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.007 18:1| 1.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.08 100| 0| 0 250220/0500Z 41 02006KT 21.8F SNOW 14:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.013 17:1| 1.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.09 100| 0| 0 250220/0600Z 42 02005KT 22.0F SNOW 18:1| 0.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.048 18:1| 2.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.14 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 250220/0700Z 43 02004KT 22.2F SNOW 17:1| 1.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.060 18:1| 3.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.20 100| 0| 0 250220/0800Z 44 01005KT 22.4F SNOW 19:1| 0.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.051 18:1| 4.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.25 100| 0| 0 250220/0900Z 45 36005KT 22.4F SNOW 18:1| 0.7|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.040 18:1| 5.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.29 100| 0| 0 250220/1000Z 46 36006KT 22.4F SNOW 20:1| 0.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.041 18:1| 6.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.33 100| 0| 0 250220/1100Z 47 35006KT 22.5F SNOW 24:1| 0.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.031 19:1| 6.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.37 100| 0| 0 250220/1200Z 48 36006KT 22.5F SNOW 20:1| 0.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.027 19:1| 7.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.39 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 250220/1300Z 49 36006KT 23.1F SNOW 21:1| 0.6|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.028 19:1| 7.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.42 100| 0| 0 250220/1400Z 50 35007KT 23.6F SNOW 20:1| 0.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.026 19:1| 8.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.45 100| 0| 0 250220/1500Z 51 34007KT 23.8F SNOW 15:1| 0.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.024 19:1| 8.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.47 100| 0| 0 250220/1600Z 52 34008KT 24.2F SNOW 17:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.013 19:1| 9.0|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.48 100| 0| 0 250220/1700Z 53 33010KT 24.2F SNOW 24:1| 0.3|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.014 19:1| 9.4|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.50 100| 0| 0 250220/1800Z 54 32010KT 23.4F SNOW 13:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.013 19:1| 9.5|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.51 100| 0| 0 ----------------------------------------------+----++-----+-------------++--------------++-------------++-----------+---+--- 250220/1900Z 55 32010KT 24.0F SNOW 8:1| 0.2|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.027 18:1| 9.8|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.54 100| 0| 0 250220/2000Z 56 32011KT 24.9F SNOW 10:1| 0.1|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.012 18:1| 9.9|| 0.00|| 0.00|| 0.55 100| 0| 0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted Tuesday at 06:01 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:01 PM the NAM is such an unhinged model, I love it. Gonna be sad when its retired. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted Tuesday at 06:04 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:04 PM This years snow hole looks about like the Nina snow anomaly map. Just worse and it extends northeast more because we never got the 1-2 typical Nina miller b storms that save NYC-Boston. But not sure this should be all that shocking. Nina’s often have a snow hole between where the southern and southern streak storms set up and it’s often over Maryland northwest of the bay. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paleocene Posted Tuesday at 06:05 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:05 PM Who is hype for the 18z NAM? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LongRanger Posted Tuesday at 06:06 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:06 PM Mr. Miyagi says "Snow on" 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted Tuesday at 06:07 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:07 PM 1 minute ago, Paleocene said: Who is hype for the 18z NAM? 18z NAM, .5” over DC again, this time, snow total though, not QPF 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted Tuesday at 06:07 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:07 PM I am done completely dismissing the atmospheric memory theory. I will use it in the future as part of what i am looking at. It just seems to be right too often to ignore. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dailylurker Posted Tuesday at 06:15 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:15 PM 4 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: I am done completely dismissing the atmospheric memory theory. I will use it in the future as part of what i am looking at. It just seems to be right too often to ignore. I use to make fun of Justin Berk over that. Not laughing as hard after this season even though I benefited from it. The reason were in a drought is because the same area in VA has gotten all the rain for the past 8 months. We just get scraps up here. Our rain events lately have busted hard on qpf but no one cares so no one noticed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted Tuesday at 06:16 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:16 PM Just now, dailylurker said: I use to make fun of Justin Berk over that. Not laughing as hard after this season even though I benefited from it. The reason were in a drought is because the same area in VA has gotten all the rain for the past 8 months. We just get scraps up here. Our rain events lately have busted hard on qpf but no one cares so no one noticed. Justin is a good guy. Wish we wasn’t such a snow weenie. Spent a lot of time with him back in the early-mid 2010’s right about when he went off the air. He knows weather, just loves calling for snow to get views. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fozz Posted Tuesday at 06:17 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:17 PM 12 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: This years snow hole looks about like the Nina snow anomaly map. Just worse and it extends northeast more because we never got the 1-2 typical Nina miller b storms that save NYC-Boston. But not sure this should be all that shocking. Nina’s often have a snow hole between where the southern and southern streak storms set up and it’s often over Maryland northwest of the bay. Where is that Nina snow anomaly map? I don’t think I’ve seen it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dailylurker Posted Tuesday at 06:18 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:18 PM 2 minutes ago, DDweatherman said: Justin is a good guy. Wish we wasn’t such a snow weenie. Spent a lot of time with him back in the early-mid 2010’s right about when he went off the air. He knows weather, just loves calling for snow to get views. I agree. He's annoying but he's one of us. He's been trying harder to not get overly excited lately and dropping weenie maps on the soccer mom's that follow him. He does know our region really well. Better then most local Mets imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kmlwx Posted Tuesday at 06:19 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:19 PM Just now, DDweatherman said: Justin is a good guy. Wish we wasn’t such a snow weenie. Spent a lot of time with him back in the early-mid 2010’s right about when he went off the air. He knows weather, just loves calling for snow to get views. I "interned" with him and Tony Pann on WeatherTalk back in like 2007. It was a blast. Both of them are good guys. The problem is Justin kind of went in a weird direction and had some previous posts also about chemtrails and crap. Both of them are suckers for snow and interesting weather - which unfortunately hurts them at times. As people though - I had nothing but great things to say about them. It was cool as a high schooler to be on the air with them a few times. And I'll never shy away from saying that I whopped their butts in the weekly forecasting battle they'd do against each other. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted Tuesday at 06:19 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:19 PM 8 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: I am done completely dismissing the atmospheric memory theory. I will use it in the future as part of what i am looking at. It just seems to be right too often to ignore. I feel like atmospheric memory and Chill's "train tracks" are kinda cut from a simar cloth. It’s kinda like when a winter shows ya who it is...believe it the first time, lol 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted Tuesday at 06:20 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:20 PM 11 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: I am done completely dismissing the atmospheric memory theory. I will use it in the future as part of what i am looking at. It just seems to be right too often to ignore. So this is semantics but I do think important distinction for any newbies. What I think you’re calling “memory” is actually seasonal pattern tendencies. In this case, a Nina background state with a somewhat stronger NS and weaker SS. The result of that is weaker SS waves that don’t phase and come north and NS waves that fly by to our north and a gap in between. 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted Tuesday at 06:22 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:22 PM 5 minutes ago, Fozz said: Where is that Nina snow anomaly map? I don’t think I’ve seen it I can’t find it. It used to be up somewhere on the web. Maybe someone knows who produced it or how to recreate it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravensrule Posted Tuesday at 06:26 PM Author Share Posted Tuesday at 06:26 PM 3 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: I can’t find it. It used to be up somewhere on the web. Maybe someone knows who produced it or how to recreate it. Can you recreate the 12Z Saturday Euro run for us please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted Tuesday at 06:28 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:28 PM 7 minutes ago, dailylurker said: I agree. He's annoying but he's one of us. He's been trying harder to not get overly excited lately and dropping weenie maps on the soccer mom's that follow him. He does know our region really well. Better then most local Mets imo. The soccer moms love him…huge part of his audience. 7 minutes ago, Kmlwx said: I "interned" with him and Tony Pann on WeatherTalk back in like 2007. It was a blast. Both of them are good guys. The problem is Justin kind of went in a weird direction and had some previous posts also about chemtrails and crap. Both of them are suckers for snow and interesting weather - which unfortunately hurts them at times. As people though - I had nothing but great things to say about them. It was cool as a high schooler to be on the air with them a few times. And I'll never shy away from saying that I whopped their butts in the weekly forecasting battle they'd do against each other. it was interesting when he decided to leave the air. I know he has done several philanthropies, many good causes which I can get behind. There were all good guys on the Baltimore stations. Steve Fertig from Fox was a cool one too (but Fox sucked in Baltimore). Better than WJZ giving part time met “creds” to Marty Bass. (I miss Bernadette, met her too, lovely) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mitchnick Posted Tuesday at 06:28 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:28 PM 1 minute ago, ravensrule said: Can you recreate the 12Z Saturday Euro run for us please. I can. 2 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted Tuesday at 06:28 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:28 PM 8 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: So this is semantics but I do think important distinction for any newbies. What I think you’re calling “memory” is actually seasonal pattern tendencies. In this case, a Nina background state with a somewhat stronger NS and weaker SS. The result of that is weaker SS waves that don’t phase and come north and NS waves that fly by to our north and a gap in between. Thing is even when the pattern relaxes a touch it still seems to go back to it's early winter track more often than not. I am not saying it will be the only thing I look at. just saying I will not ignore it anymore. And we have been been the beneficiary of it before. Especially 09/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JenkinsJinkies Posted Tuesday at 06:39 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:39 PM 10 minutes ago, mitchnick said: I can. I look forward to the 27th when the bulk of that is in South Carolina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted Tuesday at 06:40 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:40 PM 26 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said: I feel like atmospheric memory and Chill's "train tracks" are kinda cut from a simar cloth. It’s kinda like when a winter shows ya who it is...believe it the first time, lol Absolutely the same. Train tracks isn't the best word because the repetitive nature isnt just storm tracks. Areas can make up for lost time quickly in all categories but they way it happens is through a variety of events. It's more like a magnet than train tracks because that implies the same exact type of storm keeps happening. I've believed in it for over a decade and use it as a predictive tool. It won't always show up on h5 progs. It's more of a personality thing vs nuts and bolts. Stark examples are drought busters. All of a sudden it's time. Why and how I don't know but when switches flip they mean it. The lake Powell recovery (still bleak but last few years weren't supposed to happen lol) captures what I'm talking about. It got all kinds of unusual boosts including tropcial. There are cycles in cycles on longer timescales. Imho, and I've said this before, I don't think the last 8 years are a new anything. Meaning "sudden new normal". It was just a typical (with precedence) MA "anti-heater". Other than the 60s, there are examples in every decade. I'm not arguing that we're losing on the margins from temps. I just never once believe that we won't have strings of acceptable and normal winters. It was a big part of my confidence making a call against the grain this year. It was time and I guessed right. Intuition is telling me this year is our heater (or acceptable) kickoff year and the next 6-8 years will look pretty decent when it's all said and done. Not without a gnarly dud or 2 but it will not look or feel like the last 8 years on paper. There's my Uber long range call. Hope I'm alive for verification Lastly, I also strongly believe the EC (including us) will have a record breaking snow storm in the next 10 years. Warmer temps hurt us on the margins but def help us with intensity and qpf. I'm def not a Deb over our long term prospects. We just have to deal with a warmer planet like every other living thing on it 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted Tuesday at 06:42 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:42 PM 14 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: I can’t find it. It used to be up somewhere on the web. Maybe someone knows who produced it or how to recreate it. Some maps here wrt Nina historical snowfall https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/revisiting-la-nina-and-winter-snowfall 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted Tuesday at 06:43 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:43 PM How many times has the NAM scored a coup when it was on it's own? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Chill Posted Tuesday at 06:44 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:44 PM Just now, stormtracker said: How many times has the NAM scored a coup when it was on it's own? More than once and that's enough.... allllll in 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted Tuesday at 06:45 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 06:45 PM Just now, Bob Chill said: More than once and that's enough.... allllll in I mean when absolutely no other model showed what it showed and they all caved to IT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now