Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,795
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

FOLKS Feb 19-20 Debacle


ravensrule
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

There's a bias in play here. Gfs/gefs was getting ripped when it was weak and disorganized while the euro was going big. It was assumed to be wrong and would catch on to the euro. I looked at if different. To me it was a consistent warning sign that a cohesive storm had some problems. More that one. 

It seems like a model collapse when consensus showed the northern piece being a thorn instead of a boom. But there were plenty of warning signs not to jump on the boom bandwagon and I never did. Never doubted an OK storm, but those big totals never seemed real to me. 

I'll say this, this place would be a lot more fun if people would stop marrying mid range high end fantasy stuff. Anything less is unacceptable but less is a near certainty.... time and time again over and over lol. The majority of our storms are looked at with turd colored glasses come gametime  because of this. Even when it produces what's expected in the short range. 

Also.  As I’ve been here a long time and definitely have grown up more.  Still stings but I don’t try and bring everyone else down with rapid fire posts of despair.  I just go punt furry creatures.

 

ps.  Nam better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LP08 said:

Definitely!  If we could some how remove those max runs 120 hours out then the pages of disappointing replies to a “lesser degree” hit would make this more enjoyable.

It's a bust overall as it stands now so I'm not saying I expected a complete collapse. Burns me too but I'm used to losing 3-6" storms. Comparing this to Mar 2001? Omg wtf. A memorable bust? Idk man. The only way it can feel that way is if you were sure it was going to be big and locked in. Was it ever really close to that lol? 

  • Like 1
  • clap 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's a bias in play here. Gfs/gefs was getting ripped when it was weak and disorganized while the euro was going big. It was assumed to be wrong and would catch on to the euro. I looked at if different. To me it was a consistent warning sign that a cohesive storm had some problems. More that one. 
It seems like a model collapse when consensus showed the northern piece being a thorn instead of a boom. But there were plenty of warning signs not to jump on the boom bandwagon and I never did. Never doubted an OK storm, but those big totals never seemed real to me. 
I'll say this, this place would be a lot more fun if people would stop marrying mid range high end fantasy stuff. Anything less is unacceptable but less is a near certainty.... time and time again over and over lol. The majority of our storms are looked at with turd colored glasses come gametime  because of this. Even when it produces what's expected in the short range. 

People not posting clown maps 150+ hours out would go a long way.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

There's a bias in play here. Gfs/gefs was getting ripped when it was weak and disorganized while the euro was going big. It was assumed to be wrong and would catch on to the euro. I looked at if different. To me it was a consistent warning sign that a cohesive storm had some problems. More that one. 

It seems like a model collapse when consensus showed the northern piece being a thorn instead of a boom. But there were plenty of warning signs not to jump on the boom bandwagon and I never did. Never doubted an OK storm, but those big totals never seemed real to me. 

I'll say this, this place would be a lot more fun if people would stop marrying mid range high end fantasy stuff. Anything less is unacceptable but less is a near certainty.... time and time again over and over lol. The majority of our storms are looked at with turd colored glasses come gametime  because of this. Even when it produces what's expected in the short range. 

Never hold back your alarm bells, Bob! I think it would go a long way in setting more realistic expectations around here--seriously!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jayyy said:


Not posting clown maps 150+ hours out would go a long way.

No problems posting them or any map. They should all be posted because even fantasy runs are plenty useful in the thought algorithm. Using a 120+ hour map to make your final call with emotions attached and not accepting anything less? That's masochism man! :lol:

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bob Chill said:

There's a bias in play here. Gfs/gefs was getting ripped when it was weak and disorganized while the euro was going big. It was assumed to be wrong and would catch on to the euro. I looked at if different. To me it was a consistent warning sign that a cohesive storm had some problems. More that one. 

It seems like a model collapse when consensus showed the northern piece being a thorn instead of a boom. But there were plenty of warning signs not to jump on the boom bandwagon and I never did. Never doubted an OK storm, but those big totals never seemed real to me. 

I'll say this, this place would be a lot more fun if people would stop marrying mid range high end fantasy stuff. Anything less is unacceptable but less is a near certainty.... time and time again over and over lol. The majority of our storms are looked at with turd colored glasses come gametime  because of this. Even when it produces what's expected in the short range. 

Maybe, but I tend to think its also what I said in my previous post...the GFS was right for the wrong reasons.  Which happens sometimes.  But its more likely its bias was simply playing into the what the eventual sampling errors were going to cause.  It got lucky in other words.  Things have changed...there was a clear trend over the last 24 hours that flattened the flow ahead of the TPV in the midwest and also a trend towards a more positively tilted trough.  However, if you go back 3 days to when all guidance, even the GFS, showed what it did...under that paradigm I think the GFS was just wrong and doing its "I have trouble with complex setups" thing.  Had THAT paradigm that existed even on the GFS been correct I think a more amplified storm was the correct solution.  The problem was that paradigm was wrong...the flow was going to be a lot more progressive and less amplified.  But the GFS in its bias was incorrectly projecting what turned out to be the correct solution for a different reason.  Thats why it was starting to move in the wrong direction then had to reverse course suddenly! 

  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Maestrobjwa said:

Never hold back your alarm bells, Bob! I think it would go a long way in setting more realistic expectations around here--seriously!

I did express my concerns in the mid range. Even at the height of the runs I was pretty modest. I mentioned several times that a big cohesive storm had some problems but it was overridden with euro snow maps and intense optimism lol

  • Like 2
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shrike said:

I had to create an account to state how disappointed I am with all the posters here that are so angry they aren’t getting snow that have shut down the discussion for this storm.  In southern Delaware, I’m still forecasted to get 7 inches and would like to follow this on the models.  I would argue that Mid Atlantic has nothing to do with south central PA or West Virginia or western maryland, while Delaware is about as mid Atlantic as you can get.  There should be a region on this site called mid Appalachia so all the people whose weather is more effected by the Appalachian mountains than the Atlantic Ocean can discuss their unique environmental weather issues while the people who truely reside in the mid Atlantic ( 2 hour drive from the Atlantic Ocean from sandy hook NJ to Cape Hatteras NC) can have a resource to better understand the weather they are facing.   If the mods don’t ban the people from last night who were shouting down any people trying to discuss models with claims of bust and no snow, this site will no longer be useful to me and many others.  Thanks to all the people who talk about model output.  To the rest, you are not the center of the universe.  Learn to be a better loser.

There’s a southern MD sub forum, which may be better for you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Shrike said:

I had to create an account to state how disappointed I am with all the posters here that are so angry they aren’t getting snow that have shut down the discussion for this storm.  In southern Delaware, I’m still forecasted to get 7 inches and would like to follow this on the models.  I would argue that Mid Atlantic has nothing to do with south central PA or West Virginia or western maryland, while Delaware is about as mid Atlantic as you can get.  There should be a region on this site called mid Appalachia so all the people whose weather is more effected by the Appalachian mountains than the Atlantic Ocean can discuss their unique environmental weather issues while the people who truely reside in the mid Atlantic ( 2 hour drive from the Atlantic Ocean from sandy hook NJ to Cape Hatteras NC) can have a resource to better understand the weather they are facing.   If the mods don’t ban the people from last night who were shouting down any people trying to discuss models with claims of bust and no snow, this site will no longer be useful to me and many others.  Thanks to all the people who talk about model output.  To the rest, you are not the center of the universe.  Learn to be a better loser.

Did you say something?  

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bob Chill said:

I did express my concerns in the mid range. Even at the height of the runs I was pretty modest. I mentioned several times that a big cohesive storm had some problems but it was overridden with euro snow maps and intense optimism lol

I stand corrected, lol And you're right--that buried in a sea of pink Euro snowmaps...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shrike said:

I had to create an account to state how disappointed I am with all the posters here that are so angry they aren’t getting snow that have shut down the discussion for this storm.  In southern Delaware, I’m still forecasted to get 7 inches and would like to follow this on the models.  I would argue that Mid Atlantic has nothing to do with south central PA or West Virginia or western maryland, while Delaware is about as mid Atlantic as you can get.  There should be a region on this site called mid Appalachia so all the people whose weather is more effected by the Appalachian mountains than the Atlantic Ocean can discuss their unique environmental weather issues while the people who truely reside in the mid Atlantic ( 2 hour drive from the Atlantic Ocean from sandy hook NJ to Cape Hatteras NC) can have a resource to better understand the weather they are facing.   If the mods don’t ban the people from last night who were shouting down any people trying to discuss models with claims of bust and no snow, this site will no longer be useful to me and many others.  Thanks to all the people who talk about model output.  To the rest, you are not the center of the universe.  Learn to be a better loser.

If you want to talk about models, I’m not sure what model you’re looking at that gives you 7”.  There’s also an eastern shore/southern MD thread - might be good for you there.  

The mid-Atlantic isn’t defined by a two hour drive from the Atlantic Ocean.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...