LeesburgWx Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 3 minutes ago, Weather Will said: Boom!!!! Damn, can the NAM be the leader just this one time? 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDweatherman Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Can I ask you, if you’re thinking the Nam is onto something, and you’d be heartbroken if it was wrong…can I have some of that crack 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormyClearweather Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Just now, stormtracker said: Weird that WB has like 11 in DC for Kuchera Think that was just through 81. I know @Weather Will is on it and going to get us the pretty WB @ 84 though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Ok. All we have to do is hope that the NAM has led the way over vastly superior medium range models! Should be easily livin 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Just now, LeesburgWx said: Damn, can the NAM be the leader just this one time? lol, no 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Go NAM go…USA USA USA! 10 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imgoinhungry Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Higher resolution nam doing a better job of picking up the weather system that is currently impacting us? Better than gfs/euro?That is what I am hoping!. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 5 minutes ago, stormtracker said: Weird that WB has like 11 in DC for Kuchera The map Will posted was the 24 hr snow map through 81. This one is the entire run 3 1 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eucker Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Damn, who started this threadWe just got NAM’d 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 But also, and I'm being serious and also hopecasting: Aren't the mesoscale models. better and picking up changes better in the short range? Or is that just something we say to each to cope? 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 2 minutes ago, stormtracker said: Ok. All we have to do is hope that the NAM has led the way over vastly superior medium range models! Should be easily livin It’s like picking the 5 star Palm restaurant or the zero yelp star Arby’s down by the docks where you don’t see any cats. And you go with the Arby’s 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeesburgWx Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 In case we forgot… 5 10 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 23 minutes ago, Ji said: Psu sarcastic? Never What I feel like with JB and NAm as allies 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dailylurker Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 2 minutes ago, BTRWx's Thanks Giving said: Stop ignoring bad outcomes! Dude. Stop bringing down the room. Were moving on. Look at the NAM lol 4 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarthHokie Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 If history holds up we all know how this ends with NAM 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weather Will Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 NWS should never retire the NAM!!! 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighStakes Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 I think I would feel better if the NAM had the jackpot in Scranton. Lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weather Will Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 NWS should never retire the NAM!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Man Posted February 16 Author Share Posted February 16 5 minutes ago, LeesburgWx said: In case we forgot… @Ralph Wiggumon the end lol 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris78 Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Looks like it gets captured by the ull? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomeguyfromTakomaPark Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Scrolling through the 500 maps between all the models the NAM isn’t *that* different. I think this just illustrates that the changes to make this big aren’t that large. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H2O Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 19 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 But also, and I'm being serious and also hopecasting: Aren't the mesoscale models. better and picking up changes better in the short range? Or is that just something we say to each to cope?If the Nam showed this and turned our snow into a rainstorm which it’s done many a time we would be in a panic 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 1 minute ago, SomeguyfromTakomaPark said: Scrolling through the 500 maps between all the models the NAM isn’t *that* different. I think this just illustrates that the changes to make this big aren’t that large. I was just doing the same thing on TT (at least between GFS / NAM). Agreed, it looks to my weenie eyes that the NAM has a slightly sharper ss s/w and a touch more phasing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Ok ya it’s the NAM. I wish it was annything else. But it’s doing what I said the mid and upper level pattern should look like at the surface. Focusing more on the wave among the arctic front which pulls everything north further east. Images from my post last night about what changes I expected to see. Now if we can get everything else to come around maybe. Can’t believe I’m on a team with JB and the NAM. Shoot me now. 14 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solution Man Posted February 16 Author Share Posted February 16 Need a global to start getting it 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
overcautionisbad Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 If the NAM turns out to be right again then all these other models aren't worth shir for Virginia snowstorms and I will just ignore them until NAM is in range. 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terpeast Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: Ok ya it’s the NAM. I wish it was annything else. But it’s doing what I said the mid and upper level pattern should look like at the surface. Focusing more on the wave among the arctic front which pulls everything north further east. Images from my post last night about what changes I expected to see. Now if we can get everything else to come around maybe. Can’t believe I’m on a team with JB and the NAM. Shoot me now. Since NAM is a mesoscale model, maybe it’s seeing something that globals aren’t seeing wrt gulf moisture and latent heating putting the slp track north. LWX alluded to this in the afternoon AFD. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IronTy Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Knew when I refreshed after 10min and showed 50+ new posts that the NAM was gonna be good. Didn't disappoint. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imgoinhungry Posted February 16 Share Posted February 16 Need a global to start getting itReally hoping something with this current system in our area is confusing the hell out of gfs/euro. . 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts