Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

2/19-2/20 Miller A Magic?


fountainguy97
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, bearman said:

 

Don't know why anyone would expect anything different it almost always happens. it seems.  Lucy always pulls to ball out of the way before its kicked.

I feel like we have done well over the last 4-5 years with the higher end storms. I’ve had at least 4, 8”+ since the Christmas Eve Eve snow. I’ve also had a handful of 2”-4” snows. But I’m greedy so any chance of snow that doesn’t work out is a face palm. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, John1122 said:

I've no idea what the future radar is run off of for TWC but it's impressive even down deep into Alabama for snow. 

Starting to see some reflections on the plateau which probably means it’s reaching the ground considering how bad the radars are in that area, especially for snow. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PowellVolz said:

Starting to see some reflections on the plateau which probably means it’s reaching the ground considering how bad the radars are in that area, especially for snow. 

You'll usually see some virga there, as it's higher moisture. When the DGZ lowers is when you have the most trouble seeing snow on radar. But eastern Fentress/Western Scott is usually tough under any circumstances. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The models that showed a good thump around Clarksville and St Louis are so far winning vs the drier models that choked off totals out that way. 

Fwiw the 0z Gem/Rgem/GFS are very close to what is ground reality that way and they are upping totals this way. The GEM just put 3.5 inches into North Knox and 2.5-3 inches along and south of 40. 

The RGEM is similar with a little bonus area of 4 inches around Roane Co. 

The GFS is 2.5 inches or so along 40 and also slipped a little heavier area around Roane and Loudon co. 

None of the mixing issues around the foothills really either. 

Hopefully they don't all school the Euro west of here then lose to the Euro here. 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, John1122 said:

The Euro only gave them like 2.5 total. 

I’m starting to believe by looking at the radar that the belt of heavier snow is further south than the mods said. I’ve only seen one, 3” report in Kentucky. Would be real nice if that belt of snow holds together that’s tracking right on 40 towards ETn. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, John1122 said:

The models that showed a good thump around Clarksville and St Louis are so far winning vs the drier models that choked off totals out that way. 

Fwiw the 0z Gem/Rgem/GFS are very close to what is ground reality that way and they are upping totals this way. The GEM just put 3.5 inches into North Knox and 2.5-3 inches along and south of 40. 

The RGEM is similar with a little bonus area of 4 inches around Roane Co. 

The GFS is 2.5 inches or so along 40 and also slipped a little heavier area around Roane and Loudon co. 

None of the mixing issues around the foothills really either. 

Hopefully they don't all school the Euro west of here then lose to the Euro here. 

 

 

Yep… some of the mods are showing that belt on both sides of 40 now. It matches up with the radar. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...