Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,795
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

About time we had Miller A Feb.20th


Ginx snewx
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Yeah all set with the hr 162 jack. Good look is all I need to see.

I’m not even looking at OP runs other than pure entertainment at this stage. Show me ensemble mean and spread until we get to tomorrow night or sunday. 

  • Like 4
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh, the D6.5 position(s) thru that period are an incremental improvement in track closeness enough to justify the trend continues. 

The total blend of all guidance now, compared to 24 hours ago, is already a worldly different

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ORH_wxman said:

I’m not even looking at OP runs other than pure entertainment at this stage. Show me ensemble mean and spread until we get to tomorrow night or sunday. 

agree - and I'm trying to impress that trend is really more important at this range - including the ensemble mean in that isn't a bad idea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

That’s usually how these bombing lows go. Sucking in a tight precip field toward its core.

If this is truly coming, you know darn well we will start sweating the ticks NW, to the point it gets too close to western Long Island. Some of those far western leaners in the ensembles should get some attention. Hopefully it doesn't end up congrats upstate NY and PF....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EPS mean is a tad deeper ( 3 or so mb...) this 12z cycle...

Also presenting there are more members on the western envelope suggesting there may yet be corrections toward the NW in general - that's what that metric is used for..etc.

 

image.png.223c74f9d1400e24ff7784c6079fd76b.png

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Typhoon Tip said:

In fact... that is a rather large spread uncertainty there.  There's over 20 members along the W-NW arc...It's almost puzzling why the mean PP is situated as far out there as it is given all that tension. 

My guess is there’s a bunch of members that aren’t even “registering” as lows. Basically your failed phases/whiffs way off southeast and it skews the mean. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Why? I expect it.....not the type for for high end here

Prob like a solid 12-18 is the realistic high end scenario for us when you look at the pattern aloft. Yeah, there’s a few plausible exotic evolutions that might give us 2 feet but they are at the tail end of the distribution of outcomes. 
 

I think I’d want to see H5 stall this thing a little better for the 20”+ threat to increase…and I don’t mean like stall for 36 hours or anything…more like capture it in just the right spot and enhance the goods for 4-6 hours which is usually what turns our 12-16 inchers into 20-24 inchers. 
 

We all know most of the snow falls inside a 12-18 hour window, but having 8-9 hours of super intense rates versus 12-15 hours makes the difference. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty good look at this lead on the ensembles, What i would like to see is more of these lows tracking thru the GOM, Going ENE as it gets to SNE is no good up here if this system is that compact like some of the OP runs show but we have a long ways to go.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the 162 hr is ominous ... I rarely use that adjective as I hate the hyperbole grabbing when describing this stuff, but having members be as low as the upper 950s   west  of the BM,

image.png.5498915076ed7d6f4d9bf369dc7e8ef3.png

look at it this way.  there was poorer phasing on previous cycles, when the spread was less.  Now that we have better phasing at least suggested as possible, if not quite possible, we see the western spread balloon further out with some exceptionally deep members. 

I don't believe the two aspects are divorced in this.   So, the implication of a 965 mb low W of the BM, ( averaging 957 to 972) would be a tree leaning white out over eastern SE NH/E MA and RI

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

Prob like a solid 12-18 is the realistic high end scenario for us when you look at the pattern aloft. Yeah, there’s a few plausible exotic evolutions that might give us 2 feet but they are at the tail end of the distribution of outcomes. 
 

I think I’d want to see H5 stall this thing a little better for the 20”+ threat to increase…and I don’t mean like stall for 36 hours or anything…more like capture it in just the right spot and enhance the goods for 4-6 hours which is usually what turns our 12-16 inchers into 20-24 inchers. 
 

We all know most of the snow falls inside a 12-18 hour window, but having 8-9 hours of super intense rates versus 12-15 hours makes the difference. 

Agree on the high end range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

A lot of the fun for me with these is dreaming high-end, and this is capped. Sucks.....7 consecutive subpar seasons it is, but at least I had a wintry stretch this month.

I'm nickel and diming my way to climo after a slow start, Its hard to get an A to track NNE up to here before its LBSW.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...