Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,797
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

About time we had Miller A Feb.20th


Ginx snewx
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

lol. This thread should have been called "Miller A, Miller B, or Miller Time?" because i feel a lot of weenies gonna be hittin the bottle if this gets rug pulled. We're still ~5 days away. try to keep expectations in check 

Yup.. Equal chances for a missed / late phase, hit, or congrats DC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

Our AI overlord and the gfs being nothing is definitely a flag. We’ve seen the euro be way over amped several times this winter.

Id keep expectations at zero for at least 2-3 more days.

We know how this is probably going to play out 

Our beloved AI now crushes your backyard.. flopping around more than LeBron in the playoffs 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TauntonBlizzard2013 said:

Our AI overlord and the gfs being nothing is definitely a flag. We’ve seen the euro be way over amped several times this winter.

Id keep expectations at zero for at least 2-3 more days.

We know how this is probably going to play out 

AI shifted west

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sey-Mour Snow said:

Our beloved AI now crushes your backyard.. flopping around more than LeBron in the playoffs 

yeah it's moved about 400 miles since 18z last night. Now a Cape/EMA crusher. It will likely trend further west, even though I'd lock in right there if I could. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Kitz Craver said:

Id like to see a bit more continuity between the American suite and European, that gives me a bit of pause. I mean GFS/GEFS want nothing to do with it

Yeah, I wanna see some flinches by the GFS in the next 24 hrs. I have noticed with the GFS, especially this year. It becomes stubborn once it latches on to a solution. It did this in January, when every other model showed a miss for the most part. On the other hand despite a few Euro OP runs, it was mostly ots and never wavered. The the GFS started to buckle and eventually caved. Now here we are, the roles are reversed, but the Euro has support this time from its own ensembles and other guidance. The GFS has the, icon? Not saying this is coming yet, I think we need to get this weekend's storm figured out in the models before we can get a better consensus. This storm tomorrow isn't some 1005 low coming through, it's a rapidly deepening system that will probably have some affect down stream to our system on Thursday....

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, radarman said:

It's been awful with cyclogenesis this year.  Next time you read a magazine article pimping how AI based models will soon be better than physics based models, take the believe it when you see it approach.

But it has funny AI generated pics on lock!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, radarman said:

It's been awful with cyclogenesis this year.  Next time you read a magazine article pimping how AI based models will soon be better than physics based models, take the believe it when you see it approach.

Yes. Appreciate your opinion. But you know the doctorates have the H5 scores posted above their bed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, JC-CT said:

The GEFS don't even have a Euro like solution within its envelope. It's a flag, but also an indictment of the ensemble system

The GFS has come a long way, but even so I will never fully trust it with nor'easters. Its Feb '13 blizzard failure still astounds me.

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Yes. Appreciate your opinion. But you know the doctorates have the H5 scores posted above their bed.

I think it has more promise for short term advection based nowcasting algorithms.  Google has code in github you can run.  IMO it's still not as good as DFT based approaches but closer and could eventually be an improvement.  At some point it may be able to somewhat resolve CI based on implied OFB positions.  A DFT based alg won't be able to do that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Hoth said:

The GFS has come a long way, but even so I will never fully trust it with nor'easters. Its Feb '13 blizzard failure still astounds me.

One of my favorite storms. What happened with the gfs on that one I don’t remember 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh, the irony.
Someone somewhere is going to be feeling they got screwed.
Striving for perfection as in knowing you're in the jack D10 from an actual event occurring. The models never waffle, all look about the same and it comes to verify. What a boring hobby, there would be no need of the forum.
Science perfected which will never happen
The tracking (chase) has always been the interest not the event itself. Throw-out the IMBY mentality and just take what you get not what could have been. 
LUCKY SOB's
Y'all don't appreciate how lucky y'all are!


Back to my free airshow. F18's buzzing the sky in the 80F COC day      
 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...