Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,800
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Discussion-OBS snow event sometime between 06z Thu 2/20-12z Fri 2/21?


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

Still just light snow with that better band, but it should be enough to get us to a half inch. Only 22 degrees and the wind is blowing the powdery snow around. A beautiful hardcore winter night.

I'm going outside quite a bit to enjoy it in case it's our last snowfall of the season. Hopefully it isn't, but it's getting late and you never know. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RU848789 said:

0.5" as of 9:10 pm - love that last band - gorgeous out there...hope to make 0.6-0.7"

Final measurement around 10:45 pm was 0.6" (was poker night and we just finished, so I wasn't getting out to measure that often, lol).  Brings us to 16.5" this season.  Beautiful light fluffy snow - must be 14-15:1 ratios. About to go broom this one away.  

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, donsutherland1 said:

image.png.41b8a5a0e6bb8e9da1ae1106b30f2fb3.png

Thanks for this post Don.

 

I want to add...  The LGA snowfall was on an ASOS T... doesn't work that way in temps 20s. That needs NWS fixing as does NYC and EWR meager or nonexistent w.e.  Common sense tells you from the web cams that this is too low for W.E... I'd use 13  to 1 NYC metro,  as per modeled snowratios prior to the event.   Guess that doesn't mean much in the big scheme of things except when someone goes back to verify model qpf, or check on days with measurable w.e.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wdrag said:

Thanks for this post Don.

 

I want to add...  The LGA snowfall was on an ASOS T... doesn't work that way in temps 20s. That needs NWS fixing as does NYC and EWR meager or nonexistent w.e.  Common sense tells you from the web cams that this is too low for W.E... I'd use 13  to 1 NYC metro,  as per modeled snowratios prior to the event.   Guess that doesn't mean much in the big scheme of things except when someone goes back to verify model qpf, or check on days with measurable w.e.

 

Yes, I agree with you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Snowfall axis past 48 hours ending 12z/21. The main one was a 250-300 mi miss to the south on the D6.5 ensemble outlook issued around 4A/14.   Our general snowfall in the area was roughly near 1/2", with the primary scooting out to sea well ahead of the ULL that crossed NJ-LI near 00z/21. 

These cool season max axis departures on D6 multiple model agreement ensembling is troubling-something that I think will be reduced considerably over the next 5-10 years, provided our science will be permitted the tools.

For now, my winter time threads based on cyclic ensembling agreement will be limited to at most D5.  Less lead time,  an attempt to detect the sudden departures from the glide slope of the D6-7 cyclic expectation.  This will reduce thread disappointment, but mean that American Weather comments cannot imply need for thread till we are more assured of snowfall-those comments depositing in the monthly thread, if needed.

 

 

 

Screen Shot 2025-02-21 at 8.51.24 AM.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CoCoRaHs data this morning had a bunch of T's snowfall southwest of NYC.  Sometimes I think observers got to it late, wind impacted measuring, or that less than 1/2" was commented as a T-the latter I hope I'm wrong.  Imperfect... but the main thing, many had a little snow to brighten spirits last evening.  

I see nothing confidently more than 0.1" CP snowfall for at least a week.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wdrag said:

Snowfall axis past 48 hours ending 12z/21. The main one was a 250-300 mi miss to the south on the D6.5 ensemble outlook issued around 4A/14.   Our general snowfall in the area was roughly near 1/2", with the primary scooting out to sea well ahead of the ULL that crossed NJ-LI near 00z/21. 

These cool season max axis departures on D6 multiple model agreement ensembling is troubling-something that I think will be reduced considerably over the next 5-10 years, provided our science will be permitted the tools.

For now, my winter time threads based on cyclic ensembling agreement will be limited to at most D5.  Less lead time,  an attempt to detect the sudden departures from the glide slope of the D6-7 cyclic expectation.  This will reduce thread disappointment, but mean that American Weather comments cannot imply need for thread till we are more assured of snowfall-those comments depositing in the monthly thread, if needed.

 

 

 

Screen Shot 2025-02-21 at 8.51.24 AM.png

I'd suggest within 100 hours (96 hours or 4 days), but starting it at 5 days might be good to get a head start.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...