LibertyBell Posted Sunday at 08:20 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:20 PM 17 minutes ago, Krs4Lfe said: Yeah JB gets it disastrously wrong. Good metrologies but I feel like something has changed with him over the past 5 years it's not 5 years though he's been awful since his blown call in the winter of 2001-2. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestBabylonWeather Posted Sunday at 08:27 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:27 PM The Joe bastardi accuweather blogs and endless snow hype is what brought me into this game in like 1999 or 2000 those old accuweather blogs were pretty cool 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qg_omega Posted Sunday at 08:29 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:29 PM 2 hours ago, brooklynwx99 said: the upper air pattern absolutely supported a large storm. that's what's so brutal about it. the "background state" stuff is bordering on pseudoscience. nobody can even truly explain what they mean when they say it 100 percent wrong, pattern always supported a southern slider, this was never a threat 2 1 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted Sunday at 08:29 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:29 PM 1 minute ago, WestBabylonWeather said: The Joe bastardi accuweather blogs and endless snow hype is what brought me into this game in like 1999 or 2000 those old accuweather blogs were pretty cool Yes thats the thing, we can criticize his hype of snow but also recognize that he inspired many millions of people to get interested in weather Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherpruf Posted Sunday at 08:31 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:31 PM 18 minutes ago, North and West said: I don’t really follow him, but don’t you think it’s the exact same mentality as warm mongerers here, or pundits continuously calling for a bull or bear market, or bookies making odds for a sporting event? People are just taking their shots hoping to be right to then enjoy the accolades. My $0.02 . It's worse because he sells himself as a professional with a degree, so he must know the secret sauce. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherpruf Posted Sunday at 08:33 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:33 PM Just now, LibertyBell said: Yes thats the thing, we can criticize his hype of snow but also recognize that he inspired many millions of people to get interested in weather It was all anyone had.....the only other thing I remember was Weathermatrix, who also worked for Accu....they started a forum in 2007, but the region was far too expansive, though Anthony's presence was obvious even there.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnoSki14 Posted Sunday at 08:33 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:33 PM 1 minute ago, qg_omega said: 100 percent wrong, pattern always supported a southern slider, this was never a threat I disagree. Pattern definitely supported a threat but the indices don't mean as much as they used to. The northern stream is the killer and it has been for years now. A strongly negative -AO and MJO phase 8 would've guaranteed a storm in the past. However I'm tired of all the hype and pretty maps everyone posts. Anyone can hype up a day 10 threat, but where's the results. Stick with 3 days or less and you won't be disappointed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastonSN+ Posted Sunday at 08:36 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:36 PM 20 minutes ago, LibertyBell said: and with the current storm we are seeing the -5 AO cause a cutter This is the block right now see how far north and east it is. If this were further west and further south we would have had snow. This will be the block Thursday. See how far south it is and how strong it is. If this were a little weaker or a little further north we would have had snow. You could see the kicker storm on this depiction too. So yes it's too strong and negative 5 and too far south. Weaker or little North with this strength and we would have snowed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BxEngine Posted Sunday at 08:36 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:36 PM 6 minutes ago, qg_omega said: 100 percent wrong, pattern always supported a southern slider, this was never a threat Can you call the europeans and have them fix their euro model, and explain why it was wrong when it showed a storm coming up the coast? Thanks in advance. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weatherpruf Posted Sunday at 08:37 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:37 PM 18 minutes ago, Rjay said: Hmmm what could it be Too many years of steroid use would be my guess, though he always claimed he was all natural....but so did Lance Armstrong and most of the former GDR swimming teams...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormlover74 Posted Sunday at 08:39 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:39 PM 5 minutes ago, weatherpruf said: It's worse because he sells himself as a professional with a degree, so he must know the secret sauce. I used to watch him on weather world at psu in the 90s. He is an actual meteorologist. But he always goes cold and snowy and for a while thats what we had so he was right more than he was wrong. Once he left accuwx and went to wxbell and Twitter that was it though 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brooklynwx99 Posted Sunday at 08:41 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:41 PM 12 minutes ago, qg_omega said: 100 percent wrong, pattern always supported a southern slider, this was never a threat @Rjay lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted Sunday at 08:42 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:42 PM 12 minutes ago, qg_omega said: 100 percent wrong, pattern always supported a southern slider, this was never a threat Dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted Sunday at 08:42 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:42 PM Just now, brooklynwx99 said: @Rjay lol I just ignored it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted Sunday at 08:42 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:42 PM Nam is really close just like the sref 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormlover74 Posted Sunday at 08:42 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:42 PM Nam lol...crushes us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted Sunday at 08:43 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:43 PM We’re back (sarcasm) Image Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestBabylonWeather Posted Sunday at 08:44 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:44 PM Maybe a 2022 repeat. 24” at islip and like 6” in CP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RU848789 Posted Sunday at 08:46 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:46 PM It ain't over til it's over, lol, with obviously more to come, although it is the end of its range NAM... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northof78 Posted Sunday at 08:46 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:46 PM 84 Hour NAM, we are So BACK 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastonSN+ Posted Sunday at 08:47 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:47 PM I mean we all still know we will be checking every run of the major models for the next couple days LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJO812 Posted Sunday at 08:47 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:47 PM 3 minutes ago, nycsnow said: We’re back (sarcasm) Image We might be. Never give up especially when all the models once showed a huge snowstorm. 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailMan06 Posted Sunday at 08:47 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:47 PM We’re so back! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nycsnow Posted Sunday at 08:48 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:48 PM Icon starting let’s see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dseagull Posted Sunday at 08:48 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:48 PM 3 minutes ago, WestBabylonWeather said: Maybe a 2022 repeat. 24” at islip and like 6” in CP You beat me to it. I have so much video from that storm. Incredible hit down here with that bomb. Just wish it wasn't so fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjay Posted Sunday at 08:48 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:48 PM Just now, nycsnow said: Icon starting let’s see Predicting a complete whiff 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted Sunday at 08:50 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:50 PM 12 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said: This is the block right now see how far north and east it is. If this were further west and further south we would have had snow. This will be the block Thursday. See how far south it is and how strong it is. If this were a little weaker or a little further north we would have had snow. You could see the kicker storm on this depiction too. So yes it's too strong and negative 5 and too far south. Weaker or little North with this strength and we would have snowed. It seems like a thread the needle pattern and it's either too far north or too far south. In a season like, say, 2014-15, we would have had snow across a wider range of solutions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mob1 Posted Sunday at 08:51 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:51 PM 7 minutes ago, MJO812 said: Nam is really close just like the sref It's more than merely close, look at the trajectory in the final few frames. It's the NAM so take it with a grain of salt, but verbatim it's great. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LibertyBell Posted Sunday at 08:52 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:52 PM 7 minutes ago, WestBabylonWeather said: Maybe a 2022 repeat. 24” at islip and like 6” in CP People forget that Brooklyn on east everyone had 12" or more. It was only the park that had 6 inches or whatever they had,. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastalplainsnowman Posted Sunday at 08:55 PM Share Posted Sunday at 08:55 PM 15 minutes ago, weatherpruf said: Too many years of steroid use would be my guess, though he always claimed he was all natural....but so did Lance Armstrong and most of the former GDR swimming teams...... This is funny in a few ways. "JB's predictions for snow were typically 25% higher than average, but this was found to be due to PEDs." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now