Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,729
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    kraken613
    Newest Member
    kraken613
    Joined

Feb 11-13: Nowcast/Obs


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, ravensrule said:

Holy crap. So you think Northern Baltimore City gets 2”?. That probably means i get 1.5” tops. 

Sorry I’m still hung over. The range is 2-5” for the Baltimore area. Say inside the beltway. More south less north. But the difference might not be 2-5. If the 5 is right for the south maybe 3-4 north. If the south gets 4 the north side might be 2-3. This is way too specific but if you want a range for like Towson maybe 2-4” 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

GFS looking pretty decent right now..precip arriving...timing looks the same...it's gonna be stubborn and have that heavy stripe again in the south

Jog norther with the heavy precip and it’s really heavy in some spots… it’s gonna be so wrong for whoever it says gets 20”

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:

Jog norther with the heavy precip and it’s really heavy in some spots… it’s gonna be so wrong for whoever it says gets 20”

Thing is even the runs lately that move that fgen death band north don’t help north of 70 at all it just tightens the gradient. Models seem to be locked in that the dry air wins lie up here. 
 

 

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Sorry I’m still hung over. The range is 2-5” for the Baltimore area. Say inside the beltway. More south less north. But the difference might not be 2-5. If the 5 is right for the south maybe 3-4 north. If the south gets 4 the north side might be 2-3. This is way too specific but if you want a range for like Towson maybe 2-4” 

FV3 confirms everything that I’ve been wary about.

And with poor snow growth on the fringes (GFS has low ratios for Kuchera), I don’t even think 2” is a guarantee north of the Baltimore beltway.

  • Weenie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Gfs adamant on double digit totals south of dc close to RIC but the wakefield wfo isn’t having any of it.

Ur right wakefield barely saying much more then 1 -3 for Richmond. They. Aren't putting alot of stock in the Snowmaps...

 

From Wakefield .....

 

 

 

 

 

Screenshot_20250210_225818_Chrome Beta.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Gfs adamant on double digit totals south of dc close to RIC but the wakefield wfo isn’t having any of it.

       The snow depth product is notably less than 1/2 of those amounts.    That product isn't the gospel by any means, but when the discrepancy between the snowfall and snow depth maps is that large, that tells me that the model really isn't producing the big snow totals suggested by those maps.

  • 100% 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...