Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,797
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

2/14-2/15 Potential Major Winter Storm


A-L-E-K
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Radtechwxman said:

I'm happy for the potential for you Michigan folks. But wish I could squeak in one good snow. Waa snows definitely look to be non event here. My only hope is the wraparound. 

Crazy how different it is just a state away!!  I hope the WAA gets going enough which benefits you too!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Stevo6899 said:

Still pretty drastic differences between the nam/gfs and the rgem/euro. Ukie is on the SE side also.

Nam has the low over Lake Erie meanwhile RGEM is by the PA/OH border. A good 200 mile difference. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Snowstorms said:

Nam has the low over Lake Erie meanwhile RGEM is by the PA/OH border. A good 200 mile difference. 

Early look at gfs, it's gonna be on the amped side. You can tell early on the ridge and the gfs digs the low more, thus stronger, more nw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stevo6899 said:

Early look at gfs, it's gonna be on the amped side. You can tell early on the ridge and the gfs digs the low more, thus stronger, more nw. 

Definitely further NW than the RDPS but still SE and colder than the NAM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meanwhile DTX has a snow map out already with three to four inches for the whole area through the weekend. Kind of surprised they even threw out totals considering the vast differences in the models. The last storm the GFS was right and had a weaker storm while the euro was wrong and had a stronger storm. Both portraying the opposite this go around. I'd hate to be the nws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SchaumburgStormer said:

Cold side precip seems odd, would think for a more wound up solution it would be throwing some more consistent moisture back into IL/WI

I thought the exact same thing. Maybe moisture getting robbed by convection. I definitely don't dig the look of gfs for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fwiw i'm hedging on the stronger/nw solutions based on the consistent slower/sharper trend with the trough and resulting lee cyclogenesis, surface features vary widely from model to model and run to run but this upper level trend is p consistent 

trend-gfs-2025021412-f036-500h-anom-na.g

 

running out of time for changes but we're right at the point where small shifts will result in large changes to the cold sector qpf fields

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cold side precip seems odd, would think for a more wound up solution it would be throwing some more consistent moisture back into IL/WI

That has to do with the evolution aloft, in which how things are currently depicted are not favorable for such.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...