Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,695
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    MeinBender
    Newest Member
    MeinBender
    Joined

February 11-12: Is it real?


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Buddy1987 said:

I got a better chance of surviving gas station sushi than I do of the GFS verifying. It will cave soon. 

I watched Bernie Rayno's video last night and he was saying how the GFS has a stronger piece of energy than the Euro and that's why it's showing more snow but thought that Euro was right. Said there is that other piece of energy that forms the next storm right on its heels so it doesn't make sense that the energy for the Tuesday storm is as strong as the GFS suggests.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, osfan24 said:

I watched Bernie Rayno's video last night and he was saying how the GFS has a stronger piece of energy than the Euro and that's why it's showing more snow but thought that Euro was right. Said there is that other piece of energy that forms the next storm right on its heels so it doesn't make sense that the energy for the Tuesday storm is as strong as the GFS suggests.

Agreed. Very hard to bet against the Euro. Is the AI similar and in agreeance or does it at least bring a better snow shield for most? I’m not as caught up as I usually am.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Buddy1987 said:

Agreed. Very hard to bet against the Euro. Is the AI similar and in agreeance or does it at least bring a better snow shield for most? I’m not as caught up as I usually am.

New run actually spitting out here in just a sec. 0z looked pretty good moved in right direction for us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6z AI brought south a bit the Tuesday precip similar to 18z yesterday. BUT, late Wednesday night into Thursday is mostly snow along (maybe a touch N&W) of the fall line. For places north and west that stay all snow bith events are probably low double digits.

Haven't looked at the rest of run. Will post any additional threats in the Long Range thread.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, I’m gonna pick up the pbp at 12z.  Just gonna keep it neutral:  Good (folks), decent, serviceable and not ideal.  Also, keep in mind, I’ve always championed ANY snow as good. 1-3 2-4.  So just because I say a model with 4-6 is a step back from the previous run is not ideal, doesn’t mean I eschewing 4-6 inches.  Ok? I’m just describing a model relative to its previous run.  
 

With that said, I hope you motherfuckers get buried. I’m also begging someone to post about how they have important plans on Tuesday and Wednesday.  
 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 10
  • clap 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buddy1987 said:

I got a better chance of surviving gas station sushi than I do of the GFS verifying. It will cave soon. 

It's funny because if it was the opposite way and all the snow from the GFS was in the DC area nobody will be saying that lol

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

Anyway, I’m gonna pick up the pbp at 12z.  Just gonna keep it neutral:  Good (folks), decent, serviceable and not ideal.  Also, keep in mind, I’ve always championed ANY snow as good. 1-3 2-4.  So just because I say a model with 4-6 is a step back from the previous run is not ideal, doesn’t mean I eschewing 4-6 inches.  Ok? I’m just describing a model relative to its previous run.  
 

With that said, I hope you motherfuckers get buried. I’m also begging someone to post about how they have important plans on Tuesday and Wednesday.  
 

I have a dentist appointment Weds AM. Will I have to reschedule?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stormtracker said:

Anyway, I’m gonna pick up the pbp at 12z.  Just gonna keep it neutral:  Good (folks), decent, serviceable and not ideal.  Also, keep in mind, I’ve always championed ANY snow as good. 1-3 2-4.  So just because I say a model with 4-6 is a step back from the previous run is not ideal, doesn’t mean I eschewing 4-6 inches.  Ok? I’m just describing a model relative to its previous run.  
 

With that said, I hope you motherfuckers get buried. I’m also begging someone to post about how they have important plans on Tuesday and Wednesday.  
 

Based on your recent pbp and how crappy the storm will be for our area it looks like i'm better off driving to North Jersey for my important work trip. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Anyway, I’m gonna pick up the pbp at 12z.  Just gonna keep it neutral:  Good (folks), decent, serviceable and not ideal.  Also, keep in mind, I’ve always championed ANY snow as good. 1-3 2-4.  So just because I say a model with 4-6 is a step back from the previous run is not ideal, doesn’t mean I eschewing 4-6 inches.  Ok? I’m just describing a model relative to its previous run.  
 

With that said, I hope you motherfuckers get buried. I’m also begging someone to post about how they have important plans on Tuesday and Wednesday.  
 

I have important plans Tuesday and Wednesday.  They are important.  And they are plans.  

Its funny how I slammed the Euro yesterday for jumping around and then the GFS says "hold my weenie."  These big shifts are getting to be old AF.  Not as old as Wes, mind you, but old.  I just want to get a nice snow and not one that wrecks my back.  A permanent hunch is not sexy.  

47/31 and here's to the 12z being the best runs since 2016.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, H2O said:

I have important plans Tuesday and Wednesday.  They are important.  And they are plans.  

Its funny how I slammed the Euro yesterday for jumping around and then the GFS says "hold my weenie."  These big shifts are getting to be old AF.  Not as old as Wes, mind you, but old.  I just want to get a nice snow and not one that wrecks my back.  A permanent hunch is not sexy.  

47/31 and here's to the 12z being the best runs since 2016.  

Like I said yesterday, people gotta set their expectations in check. Foot plus snowstorms are rare and for a reason.  GFS was the only one being crazy with these amounts. It’ll prob come down to Earth today or tonight.  I think the 6z Euro is our max.  I’m good with that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

Like I said yesterday, people gotta set their expectations in check. Foot plus snowstorms are rare and for a reason.  GFS was the only one being crazy with these amounts. It’ll prob come down to Earth today or tonight.  I think the 6z Euro is our max.  I’m good with that. 

Snow maps are the devil.  Being in the jack sets everyones expectations too high cause then you get runs that jump around and it causes all the OH NOES.  and this is despite people also making posts saying they know things shift.  Yet they take one goddamn run with the most and say THIS IS WHAT HAS TO HAPPEN!!  

I'm expecting the models to cut back on the jumping(GFS) and if it shows a consistent 4" for the area then its a good storm.  When you have a train of waves, each run will focus on one wave over another depending on the model.  

I trust the NAVGEM.  

  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Had the models not spit out 20" runs a few days ago and instead showed an ice/rain/mix... and then started showing 6" runs today, we'd be ecstatic right now. But we're more like, meh I'll accept it as a consolation prize. This board is wild (and I mean that in a good way). 

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The euro Ai does exactly what my main fear is, at least up in Philly… the wave behind it becomes the dominant force and 11-12th wave is mostly overrunning. The wave for middle/end of week favors inland at this time. This scenario could work for southern sections because the lead wave ends up being mostly overrunning


.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Heisy said:

The euro Ai does exactly what my main fear is, at least up in Philly… the wave behind it becomes the dominant force and 11-12th wave is mostly overrunning. The wave for middle/end of week favors inland at this time. This scenario could work for southern sections because the lead wave ends up being mostly overrunning


.

I wish I could say relax, but that is exactly what I was thinking was a legit fail mode for places north of DC but south of central PA.  I've seen that happen before...where initially the lead wave is supposed to be dominant but more energy gets held back and we get a front running weaker wave that gives snow to our south...then a stronger storm right behind it that goes to our NW.  Frankly that's no good for anyone because even the places that get good snow from the front runner has it all washed away almost immediately by a big rainstorm.  But so far the AI is mostly alone in that, but its definitely something to look out for and is the most likely way we fail here imo.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Terpeast said:

Had the models not spit out 20" runs a few days ago and instead showed an ice/rain/mix... and then started showing 6" runs today, we'd be ecstatic right now. But we're more like, meh I'll accept it as a consolation prize. This board is wild (and I mean that in a good way). 

Haha, it definitely is a matter of the order of what the models show as to what everyone's expectations are. I also think I'm just starved for something significant. It's been nine years. Half a foot is fine, but 6 inches or less is basically all I've had for 9 years (that's what she said).

The GFS is just a stronger and much longer storm than the Euro. Which is right? Probably the Euro since it's the better model, more realistic scenario, and generally matches the other models.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...