Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,787
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    countessweather
    Newest Member
    countessweather
    Joined

February 11-12; 12-13: Are they real??


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, SLPressure said:

On TT, there is the option to look at "positive snow depth change". What exactly does that mean? It shows  7 north to 8 south at 45h, yet 10-1 has 8 north to 12 south. Which is more accurate?

This takes melting/ surface temperatures/ rates etc into consideration.  A lot of people say that it is more useful than the regular total snowfall.  I am convinced that Tt counts cold rain as snow for in total snowfall maps.. so positive snow depth is probably more reliable.  

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

LWX playing it safe, same totals from F'burg to Winchester. I'd expect a pretty decent gradient between those locations, but then again southern locations will get more QPF w/ more melting also I suppose.

I wonder if they'll throw out the WSW's for these areas for the ~1030AM forecast cycle or wait for the afternoon folks? I guess that's probably cutting it too close...

ALSO LWX's doppler radar has been down for a couple days now (pedestal issues, so kinda a big deal) - they hope to get it fixed by this evening, but yikes, that'll be less than 24hr before precip onset in the area. It goes without saying that LWX's radar coverage is CRUCIAL for the entire NoVA / DC / Bmore area.

StormTotalSnow.jpg

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LeesburgWx said:

This should be better for most than Jan 6th. 6-10” looks like a great storm coming

Thank you! I was getting annoyed with the all the over cautiousness/ conservatism wrt to the total potential for this storm.  Everyone seems to be stuck on 3-6/ 2-4 amounts.  I think that It won’t take much to push this over 8 inches.  So why not go all in?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Scraff said:

So the NAM 3K is in its wheelhouse right? :yikes:

If it was different from the globals in track, precip totals, etc. I’d probably still be a little skeptical at this point? But it’s not. I think it’s been steady and in line with the globals so I think it’s very much worth factoring into forecasts.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MillvilleWx said:

My thoughts haven’t really changed too much. This storm is really looking like a 70-80% of what happened on 1/6. Similar thought of the max somewhere along and south of Rt50 with the best spot between Fredericksburg up to Annapolis and points in-between on the west side of the Bay. Higher elevations west of Fredericksburg will also see some significant accumulations that could very well be within the maxima. 3-6” is very likely (85+%), 5-8” is probably the median/mean outcomes, and the high side is 9-10” as the opportunity for >10” is unlikely considering the forward propagation speed along with marginal thermals in the beginning before improvement in the evening Tuesday through the overnight. A solid storm incoming which I’m sure will produce a few surprises. 

No changes to my thoughts from overnight. The 12z NAMNest looks pretty solid for many with the max located along and south of Rt50 with the heaviest likely in similar areas that hit 1/6. Another solid storm for the lowlands it seems. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MillvilleWx said:

No changes to my thoughts from overnight. The 12z NAMNest looks pretty solid for many with the max located along and south of Rt50 with the heaviest likely in similar areas that hit 1/6. Another solid storm for the lowlands it seems. 

3-6 seems kinda low for what models are spitting out.   It's def not gonna be 11" like the NAM shows.  But I defer to you, the scientist.  I'm out of my depth here. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SnowenOutThere said:

I know everyone is excited over the NAM (and we should be!) as it provides a good high range output, but the 12z HRRR I think provides a decent example of what a low end "bust" output would be for the region (and even then its not that bad).

Hrrr gets temps up to upper 30s/near 40 tomorrow. Hope that’s wrong.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SnowenOutThere said:

I know everyone is excited over the NAM (and we should be!) as it provides a good high range output, but the 12z HRRR I think provides a decent example of what a low end "bust" output would be for the region (and even then its not that bad).

This is setting up for a classic letdown when folks expect 6-8 sub-wide.

3-5 for most is the bar, I think, and we should be very happy with that if it verifies.

  • Weenie 2
  • Disagree 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

If it was different from the globals in track, precip totals, etc. I’d probably still be a little skeptical at this point? But it’s not. I think it’s been steady and in line with the globals so I think it’s very much worth factoring into forecasts.

Good point for sure! So that said, what are your thoughts for the HoCo crew? I’ve been thinking 4-6 for a while now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...