Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,717
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Srakete
    Newest Member
    Srakete
    Joined

February 11-12; 12-13: Are they real??


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

Think we’re pretty much at noise level run to run changes. Each one may make a difference for someone’s backyard, but I don’t think there’s been any real “trend” in any direction for 24 hours or so. At this point, bigger differences are going to be due to ratios, whether any precipitation is lost to melting tomorrow afternoon, banding, etc

  • Like 9
  • 100% 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think we’re pretty much at noise level run to run changes. Each one may make a difference for someone’s backyard, but I don’t think there’s been any real “trend” in any direction for 24 hours or so. At this point, bigger differences are going to be due to ratios, whether any precipitation is lost to melting tomorrow afternoon, banding, etc

One reason for the drier models is that the storm is ending way quicker. 1am instead of 9am on Wednesday. So much got the 24 hour storm
  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a really easy forecast for dc IMO.  I don’t see anything that makes me think 3-6 won’t work. I’m really excited for Tuesday night after sunset, gonna be prime jeb walking conditions.  Hopefully we can get something else in the PSU window but I am treating this as if it’s our last snow, gonna savor it. 

  • Like 1
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ji said:


One reason for the drier models is that the storm is ending way quicker. 1am instead of 9am on Wednesday. So much got the 24 hour storm

I was never buying it and if it did show .75 inches qpf over 24 hours I would think that a lot of that is lost to melting especially during the day time.  I would much rather see .4 inches in a 6 hour period than .75 over 24 hours. 
 

  • Like 2
  • 100% 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Interstate said:

Even with the Kuchera :wacko2: most people north of Baltimore are under 5 inches. I would go with the 10:1 anyways. 

IMG_6313.jpeg

You wrote South of Baltimore and now you wrote North of Baltimore. I guess in your mind Baltimore doesn’t exist. Either way you were wrong. 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ravensrule said:

You wrote South of Baltimore and now you wrote North of Baltimore. I guess in your mind Baltimore doesn’t exist. Either way you were wrong. 

I think you are confused. Go reread. I said that 5-7 is south of Baltimore, and in the latest post I said that north of Baltimore is under 5 inches. 
 

I just fixed the original post of the user saying south of the M/D line was 5-7. 

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • WxUSAF locked and unpinned this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...